Cystotomy catheter capture device and methods of using same

Abstract

A catheter capture device comprising a urethral sound and a sleeve that utilizes balloon inflation to capture the catheter. A catheter capture device comprising a urethral sound and a clamshell device. The clamshell device comprises two halves, one of which comprises two pins. One pin passes through the lateral holes in the tip of the catheter, and the other pin fits into a notch in the bottom half of the clamshell device. A catheter capture device comprising a urethral sound, a sleeve and a pin that passes through the lateral holes in the tip of the catheter. A catheter capture device comprising a urethral sound, a wire and a nodule, wherein the nodule captures the catheter by lodging in the tip of the catheter. The nodule could be a ball, hook, crimped wire or similar object. A method of capturing a catheter in an obese or non-obese patient.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION [0001] This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10 / 837,879, which was filed on May 3, 2004. The latter application in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Application No. 60 / 466,959, filed on May 5, 2003. The contents of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference into the present disclosure.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] 1. Field of the Invention [0003] The present invention relates to the field of medical devices, and more particularly, to a device that facilitates suprapubic catheter placement, even in the morbidly obese, in connection with vaginal surgeries for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse. The catheter capture device of the present invention can also be used for permanent suprapubic catheterizations in those situations in which patients suffer from incurable incontinence or urinary retention. The catheter capture device of the present invention includes b...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0025] The present invention also covers a number of different methods of capturing a catheter, corresponding to the catheter capture devices described above. The first method comprises the steps of: inserting a urethral sound through a patient's urethra into the bladder and out the abdominal wall; wherein the urethral sound comprises a removable tip, removing the removable tip; attaching a sleeve to the end of the sound from which t...

Problems solved by technology

A large percentage of these women are unable to void satisfactorily post-operatively and require a catheter to drain the bladder for several days or weeks.

PUR is generally only a temporary event lasting a few days to weeks, but it can be painful, frightening and distressing, and it can complicate postoperative care.

Many women, however, are either unable to learn or do not want to place a catheter blindly into the urethra and bladder, through a painful, freshly operated area with sutures that are oozing blood and serum (5).

Smaller catheters (i.e., catheters with a smaller diameter—not length) are used with the O/I techniques because O/I can cause perforation of the bowel or peritoneal cavity, and larger tubes (or catheters) would lead to a higher complication rate.

The I/O method, despite its advantages, has been awkward and difficult with current devices.

In comparison to I/O techniques, the O/I technique is simple, cheap and easy, but bladder drainage is unreliable because the small catheters often kink or become obstructed when small blood clots enter or form inside the catheter.

As a result, the O/I technique is never used for permanent catheterization because of unreliable urine drainage.

All O/I devices are more prone to unrecognized bowel or peritoneal perforation with serious secondary complications than the I/O devices.

The applicant believes that an important reason for the current popularity of O/I techniques is because the I/O devices that are currently available are poorly designed, awkward and difficult to use.

Moreover, catheter capture is difficult to achieve with these I/O devices.

Each of the devices currently on the market, however, has serious drawbacks.

One drawback that is common to all of these devices is that the tip of each device has a short “throw” so that it is difficult to pass the tip of the device through the abdominal wall.

When the device is too shor...

Images