Signal processing under attenuated transmission conditions

Abstract

Signal processing under attenuated transmission conditions. Within an orthogonal signal space, the number of orthogonal signals that are used to transmit information from a transmitter to a receiver is reduced and the transmitted power of each of the now remaining orthogonal signals is modified; this may involve increasing the power of all of the remaining orthogonal signals equally or alternatively modifying them individually. The same modulation used before the reduction may also be used afterwards; within communication systems having multiple transmitter-receiver paths, this will ensure that the communication system's throughput and efficiency will remain unchanged even when one (or more) transmitter-receiver paths are highly attenuated. In addition, robust mode operation is provided for ranging and registering of transmitter devices when entering the communication system. In addition, the unused orthogonal signals may be employed to support interference cancellation of those orthogonal signals that are used to transmit information.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENTS / PATENT APPLICATIONS [0001] The present U.S. Utility patent application claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to the following U.S. Provisional Patent Applications which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility patent application for all purposes: [0002] 1. U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60 / 151,680, entitled “Subdimensional single carrier modulation,” (Attorney Docket No. BP 1140), filed Aug. 31, 1999 (08 / 31 / 1999), pending. [0003] 2. U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60 / 367,564, entitled “Cancellation of interference in a communication system with application to SCDMA,” (Attorney Docket No. BP 2285), filed Mar. 26, 2002 (03 / 26 / 2002), pending. [0004] 3. U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60 / 416,889, entitled “Signal processing under attenuated transmission conditions,” (Attorney Docket No. BP 2630), filed Oct. 8, 2002 (10 / 08 / 2002), pending. [0005] The present ...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0030] The ranging and registering of the communication channel may be performed when the receiving device instructs the transmitting device to do so, or transmitting device itself may initiate the ranging and registering of the communication channel. The transmitting device uses a modulation when transmitting information using the plurality of active codes. Even after the transmitting device reduces the number of codes employed to transmit information, to the plurality of permitted codes, the ranging and registering of the communication channel may employ that same modulation. In addition, the communication system may operate at the same throughput and efficiency after reducing the number of codes as it did beforehand, thereby maintaining the same throughput and efficiency of the communication system. In some instance, the Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) that is achieved after reducing the number of codes employed to the plurality of permitted codes is even greater than the SNR that is achieved beforehand.

[0034] The method also allows transmitting information across the communication channel, from the CM to the CMTS, at a modulation when using either the plurality of active codes or the plurality of permitted codes. In addition, the SNR that is provided after switching to the plurality or permitted codes from the plurality of active codes may even be improved. Moreover, the throughput and efficiency may be maintained after switching to the plurality of permitted codes from the plurality of active codes.

Problems solved by technology

The problems presented by attenuation of transmitted signals within communication systems have existed for quite some time.

In many different types of communication systems, there may be an undesirable attenuation of a signal when being transmitted from a transmitter to a receiver through the infrastructure of the communication system.

That is to say, a transmitter may experience a large attenuation of its transmitted signals when they travel to the receiver via the communication system.

Thus, the cabling itself from the CM may itself even introduce a large attenuation even before that particular CM cabling, within the apartment building, is attached to the rest of the cable plant.

For example, within a wireless transmission path, where path length differences between the various devices within the system may vary greatly, with some transmitter-receivers being located relatively close and perhaps within a line-of-sight of a wireless termination system, while other transmitter-receivers may be located at a great distance from the wireless termination system and perhaps have an obscured line-of-sight and / or destructively interfering multipath.

While there are some prior art approaches to deal with the problems presented by undesirable attenuation of signals as they are transmitted through the communication system, these prior art approaches fail to address this large attenuation within the transmission path without also degrading the efficient operation for the full set of transmitters operating into a given receiver.

For example, in the cable modem communication system context, these prior art approaches will themselves oftentimes introduce degradation of some, if not all, of the CMs as they transmit signals to the CMTS.

In addition, these prior art approaches will typically significantly increase the complexity of the communication system's components.

This increase in the complexity of the communication system's components, provided by the prior art approaches, is typically found in increases to the complexity of the Media Access Control (MAC) (sometimes referred to as the Medium Access Control) and Physical (PHY) layer components of the communication system.

However, a major drawback of many such Adaptive Modulation approaches is the typically immense complexity associated therewith, especially, but not solely, when resolving the MAC layer issues.

This may be because the receiver is limited to receiving signals using that common set of modulation parameters or characteristics.

As mentioned above, the prior art approach of providing such rapidly changing receiver flexibility at the PHY layer and at the MAC layer is not without a significant increase in complexity.

This would undesirably reduce the raw throughput of the communication channel (bits per second) by a ratio of 5 / 6.

Clearly, there are situations where the reduction of modulation order may be even more significant and the throughput of the communication channel would be even more affected.

Another problem that often arises in such communication systems is an upper limit on the power that a particular transmitter is capable of using, or is permitted to use, to transmit its information.

Such an upper power limit may be imposed by the capabilities of economically implemented transmit amplifiers which are allocated to have a certain maximum transmit power given a spurious fidelity requirement that must be met.

In addition, the regulatory agencies (e.g., the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)) may also impose a limit on transmit power to prevent interference with other services operating within other frequency spectra.

In addition, in some systems, there is a nonlinear element in the communication channel which limits the power that can be passed through the communication channel.

However, because of the inherent limitations of the device, the transmitter can not increase its power beyond an upper limit point, as described above.

Again, this upper transmitted power limit could be due to standards, wherein the limitations are attempting to allow coexistence with other communications networks or broadcasts, such as wireless systems.

This power limitation, regardless of which source introduces it, inherently presents a limit by which this prior art approach can employ the increasing of transmitted power to address this problem.

Images