Processes for recovering oligomers of glycols and polymerization catalyst from waste streams

a polymerization catalyst and glycol technology, applied in the direction of reverse osmosis, organic chemistry, ether preparation, etc., can solve the problems of high maintenance cost, high capital cost, and reduced polymer yield,

Inactive Publication Date: 2006-03-30
SUNKARA HARI BABU +2
View PDF2 Cites 52 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0009] In some preferred embodiments, the aqueous wash stream contains 1 to 20% by weight of the polyalkylene ether glycol oligomers and further comprises one or more polymerization catalysts contained in the retentate.
[0010] In one embodiment the membrane is a reverse osmosis membrane and has a sodium chloride rejection rate preferably at least about 95% and more preferably at least about 99% under standard conditions. Preferably, the aqueous wash stream is fed to the reverse osmosis membrane at a pressure of from about 50 to about 1,000 psi, more preferably from about 150 to about 600 psi.
[0011] In another embodiment the membrane is a nanofilter membrane and has a magnesium sulfate rejection rate preferably at least about 80%, more preferably at least about 95%, under standard conditions. Preferably, the aqueous wash stream is fed to the nanofilter membrane at a pressure of from about 50 to about 400 psi, more preferably from about 100 to about 200 psi.
[0012] In one embodiment the process comprises providing two or more membranes arranged in parallel or series.
[0013] Preferably the aqueous wash stream contains 1 to 20% by weight of the polyalkylene ether glycol oligomers and further comprises one or more polymerization catalysts that are contained in the retentate. More preferably the aqueous wash stream comprises one or more acids used as a polycondensation catalyst in the polycondensation reaction, and the acids are contained in the retentate. More preferably the aqueous wash stream comprises 0.1 to 2 wt. % acid.
[0014] In a preferred embodiment, the polyalkylene ether glycol is selected from the group consisting of polyethylene ether glycol, poly(1,2-propylene ether) glycol, polytrimethylene ether glycol and polytetramethylene ether glycol. More preferably the monomeric diol comprises 1,3-propanediol, the polyalkylene ether glycol is polytrimethylene glycol, and the aqueous wash stream comprises polytrimethylene ether glycol oligomers, preferably having a number average molecular weight less than about 500.

Problems solved by technology

Depending on the molecular weight of the polymer, a significant amount (typically in the range of 1-20% by weight) of low molecular weight fraction can be extracted out, resulting in reduced yields of polymer.
Washing is also capital intensive since it results in an aqueous stream that requires distillation of large amounts of water to recover the low molecular weight oligomers before discharge.
These conventional waste treatment processes can create high capital, maintenance, and operating costs.
However, such a membrane-based procedure is impractical for commercial use with the two-phase initial product described above.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Processes for recovering oligomers of glycols and polymerization catalyst from waste streams
  • Processes for recovering oligomers of glycols and polymerization catalyst from waste streams

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Feed Preparation

[0060] 1,3-Propanediol, 13.9 kg, and 139 g concentrated sulfuric acid were added to a 22-L glass reactor and the contents polymerized at 160° C. under nitrogen until the number average molecular weight was approximated 1700. A portion (1.9 kg) of the crude polymer was transferred to a 5-L glass reactor with 1.9 kg of distilled water and the reaction mixture stirred slowly under a nitrogen blanket while heated to 100° C. After 4 hours, the heater and the stirrer were turned off and the mixture was allowed to separate into two phases by gravity. The aqueous phase was separated from the polyether phase by decantation. Distilled water (1.9 kg) was again added to the polymer phase and the reaction mixture was heated to 50° C. and then cooled. After separation into clear phases, the aqueous phase was removed from the polymer phase. The above procedure was repeated four more times and all of the collected aqueous phases were combined. A total of 5.5 gallons (20.8 L) of aq...

example 2

[0063] A FILM TEC SW30-2521 Reverse Osmosis membrane element was used and characterized as in Example 1 prior to testing, using sodium chloride solution and the procedure of Test Method 2, above. The goal was a rejection of greater than 98.5%. The 8 L feed solution was prepared as described in Example 1 except the number of water washing steps were less, resulting in higher oligomer content. This feed solution was added to the feed tank, and circulated and concentrated in the same way. For this test the material was concentrated only to (1.31×) factor and the operating pressure was 64 psig (545 kPa). The membrane separation conditions and the results are summarized and compared in Tables 2 and 3.

example 3

[0064] A DESAL DK-2540-1072 nanofilter membrane element was used and characterized as in Example 1 prior to testing, but using magnesium sulfate solution instead of the sodium chloride solution as in Test Method 2, above. The goal was a rejection of greater than 99%. The procedure was similar to Example 1, with 15.7 L of feed solution containing crude prepared as in Example 1 added to the feed tank, and circulated and concentrated in the same way. For this test the material was concentrated to (8.07×) factor and the operating pressure was 400 psig (2860 kPa). The membrane separation conditions and the results are summarized and compared in Tables 2 and 3.

TABLE 2Membrane Separation Summary Results from Examples 1-3Membrane typeSWHR-2540ASW30-2521-ADK-2540-1072Example123Pressure, psig (kPa)400 (2860)64 (543)400 (2860)Total volume5.5 gal (20.8 L)8.0 L15.7 LCollected permeate4.5 gal (17.0 L)1.9 L13.8 LConcentration factor5.5 X1.31 X8.0 XTotal acid in feed, g57.520.8837.6Total acid in ...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
pressureaaaaaaaaaa
pressureaaaaaaaaaa
pressureaaaaaaaaaa
Login to view more

Abstract

Processes for recovering and recycling oligomers and polymerization catalyst from aqueous waste streams generated during the production of polyalkylene ether glycols are provided. The processes utilize membranes; preferably reverse osmosis or nanofilter membranes. The processes can reduce waste and costs associated with the polymerization of polyalkylene ether glycols by recovery and recycling of glycols and catalysts

Description

[0001] This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 423,363, filed Apr. 25, 2003, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0002] This invention relates to membrane processes for recovering and recycling oligomers and polymerization catalyst from waste streams generated during the production of polyalkylene ether glycols. BACKGROUND [0003] Polyalkylene ether glycols, including polyethylene glycol, poly(1,2-propylene ether) glycol, and polytetramethylene ether glycol, are widely used in industry for various end use applications. They are used widely as lubricants or as starting materials for preparing lubricants used in the molding of rubbers and in the treatment of fibers, ceramics and metals. They are also used as starting materials for preparing cosmetics and medicines, as starting materials or additives for water-based paints, paper coatings, adhesives, cellophane, printing inks, abrasives, and surfacta...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): B01D61/00C07C43/11B01D61/02C07C41/36C08F2/00C08G65/30C08G65/46
CPCB01D61/025B01D61/027C07C41/36C08G65/30C08G65/46C07C43/11Y02P20/584
Inventor SUNKARA, HARI BABUCAVALL, JAMES RICHARDGOUDIE, WILLIAM WAYNE
Owner SUNKARA HARI BABU
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products

Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic.

© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap