Catalysts For Polyurethane Foam Polyol Premixes Containing Halogenated Olefin Blowing Agents

a technology of halogenated olefin and polyol premixes, which is applied in the direction of organic compound/hydride/coordination complex catalysts, physical/chemical process catalysts, chemical instruments and processes, etc., can solve the detrimental effects of the presence of polymeric silicone surfactants on the molecular weight of polymeric silicone surfactants, and achieve good quality and prolong the shelf life of polyol premixes

Inactive Publication Date: 2011-06-23
HONEYWELL INT INC
View PDF19 Cites 46 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0010]While it is possible to solve the problem by separating the blowing agent, surfactant, and catalyst, for example by adding the blowing agent, amine catalyst, or surfactant to the polyisocyanate, (“A” component) or by introducing the blowing agent, amine catalyst, or surfactant using a separate stream from the “A” or “B” component, a preferred solution is one that does not require a change in the way the foams are made. It has now been found that non-amine catalysts, e.g. inorgano-metallic catalysts, organo-metallic catalysts and / or quaternary ammonium carboxylate catalysts, either alone or in combination with amine catalysts, can extend the shelf life of polyol premixes containing hydrohaloolefins, such as, but not limited to 1234ze(E), 1233zd(E), and / or 1336mzzm(Z), such that good quality foams can be produced even if the polyol blend has been aged several weeks or months.

Problems solved by technology

It has been found that, subsequent to the decomposition of the blowing agent, the molecular weight of the polymeric silicone surfactants, if present, is detrimentally altered.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

(Comparative Example)

[0050]A polyol (B Component) formulation was made up of 100 parts by weight of a polyol blend, 1.5 parts by weight Niax L6900 silicone surfactant, 1.5 parts by weight water, 1.2 parts by weight pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (sold as Polycat 5 by Air Products and Chemicals) catalyst, and 8 parts by weight trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene blowing agent. The total B component composition, when freshly prepared and combined with 120.0 parts by weight of Lupranate M20S polymeric isocyanate yielded a good quality foam with a fine and regular cell structure. Foam reactivity was typical for a pour in place foam. The total B-side composition (112.2 parts) was then aged at 130° F. for 62 hours, and then combined with 120.0 parts of M20S polymeric isocyanate to make a foam. The foam was very poor in appearance with significant cell collapse. Significant yellowing of the polyol premix was noted during aging.

example 2

(Comparative Example)

[0051]A polyol (B Component) formulation was made up of 100 parts by weight of a polyol blend, 1.5 parts by weight Niax L6900 silicone surfactant, 1.5 parts by weight water, 1.2 parts by weight pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (sold as Polycat 5 by Air Products and Chemicals) catalyst and 8 parts by weight blowing agent trans-l-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene. The total B component composition, when freshly prepared and combined with 120.0 parts by weight of Lupranate M20S polymeric isocyanate yielded a good quality foam with a fine and regular cell structure. Foam reactivity was typical for a pour in place foam. The total B-side composition (112.2 parts) was then aged at 130° F. for 168 hours, and then combined with 120.0 parts of M20S polymeric isocyanate to make a foam. The foam was very poor in appearance with significant cell collapse. Significant yellowing of the polyol premix was noted during aging.

example 3

(Foam Test)

[0052]A polyol (B Component) formulation was made up of 100 parts by weight of a polyol blend, 1.5 parts by weight Niax L6900 silicone surfactant, 1.5 parts by weight water, 2.0 parts by weight N,N-dicyclohexylmethylamine (sold as Polycat 12 by Air Products and Chemicals) catalyst (a different amine was used such that both this foam and the comparative example had the same initial reactivity), 1.75 parts by weight a bismuth based catalyst (sold as Dabco MB-20 by Air Products and Chemicals) and 8 parts by weight trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene blowing agent. The total B component composition, when freshly prepared and combined with 120.0 parts by weight of Lupranate M20S polymeric isocyanate yielded a good quality foam with a fine and regular cell structure. Foam reactivity was typical for a pour in place foam. The total B-side composition (114.75 parts) was then aged at 130° F. for 336 hours, and then combined with 120.0 parts of M20S polymeric isocyanate to make a foam....

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
GWPaaaaaaaaaa
GWPaaaaaaaaaa
Ozone Depletion Potentialaaaaaaaaaa
Login to view more

Abstract

The invention provides polyurethane and polyisocyanurate foams and methods for the preparation thereof. More particularly, the invention relates to closed-celled, polyurethane and polyisocyanurate foams and methods for their preparation. The foams are characterized by a fine uniform cell structure and little or no foam collapse. The foams are produced with a polyol premix composition which comprises a combination of a hydrohaloolefin blowing agent, a polyol, a silicone surfactant, and a non-amine catalyst used alone or in combination with an amine catalyst.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]This application is related to and claims the priority benefit of United States provisional application Ser. No. 61 / 287,603 filed Dec. 17, 2009, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0002]The present invention pertains to polyurethane and polyisocyanurate foams and methods for the preparation thereof.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0003]Low density, rigid to semi-rigid polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foams have utility in a wide variety of insulation applications including roofing systems, building panels, building envelope insulation, spray applied foams, one and two component froth foams, insulation for refrigerators and freezers, and so called integral skin for application such as steering wheels and other automotive or aerospace cabin parts, shoe soles, and amusement park restraints. Critical to the large-scale commercial acceptance of rigid polyurethane foams is their ability to provide a good...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): C08G18/32
CPCC08G18/1875C08G2101/0025C08G2105/02C08J9/146C08J2375/04C08K5/02C08K5/053C08J2203/162C08J9/149C08G18/163C08G18/1816C08G18/222C08G18/225C08G18/227C08J9/144C08G18/22C08G2110/0016C08G2110/0025C08G2115/02B01J31/128C08G2115/00
Inventor VAN DER PUY, MICHAELWILLIAMS, DAVID JOHNGITTERE, CLIFFORD P.
Owner HONEYWELL INT INC
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products