Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing assemblies having two deflecting members and methods

Abstract

Implantable assemblies for manipulating energy transferred by members defining an anatomical joint, and methods of implanting and using. The members of the anatomical joint collectively define a path of motion. An assembly includes a first component configured to be attached to a first member of the anatomical joint; a second component configured to be attached to a second member of the anatomical joint; and a joint joining the first and second components. The first component includes a first flex member and the second component includes a second flex member. The first and second flex members are configured to flex to absorb energy transferred by the members of the anatomical joint.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0001]The present invention is directed towards systems and methods for treating, tissue of a body and more particularly, towards approaches designed to reduce mechanical energy transferred between members forming an anatomical joint.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0002]An anatomical joint is the location at which two or more bones make contact. They are constructed to allow movement and provide mechanical support, and are classified structurally and functionally. Structural classification is determined by how the bones connect to each other, while functional classification is determined by the degree of movement between the articulating bones. In practice, there is significant overlap between the two types of classifications.[0003]There are three structural classifications of anatomical joints, namely fibrous or immovable anatomical joints, cartilaginous anatomical joints and synovial anatomical joints. Fibrous / Immovable bones are connected by dense connective tis...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0041]In at least one embodiment, the first and second flex members flex and absorb energy from the forces applied by the members of the anatomical joint, thereby relieving at least a portion of the load resultant from the forces from being transferred through contacting surfaces of the anatomical joint.

[0042]In at least one embodiment, the assembly relieves load on a side of the anatomical joint to which the assembly is attached.

[0045]A method for treating an anatomical joint is provided that includes: attaching a first component of an assembly to a first anatomical member of the anatomical joint; and attaching, a second component of the assembly to a second anatomical member of the anatomical joint; wherein a joint of the assembly joins the first and second components, the first component includes a first flex member and the second component includes a second flex member; and flexing the first and second flex members to transiently variably reduce load between the first and second anatomical members of the anatomical joint, wherein the assembly is implanted.

Problems solved by technology

Recent experimental studies further indicate that excessive, repetitive loading may induce cell death, and cause morphological and cellular damage, as seen in degenerative joint disease (Lucchinetti et al., 2002 and Sauerland et al., 2003).

Gouty arthritis is caused by deposition of uric acid crystals in the joint that results in subsequent inflammation.

Unfortunately, all arthritides feature pain.

As the bone surfaces become less well protected by cartilage, the patient experiences pain upon weight bearing, including walking and standing.

Due to decreased movement because of the pain, regional muscles may atrophy, and ligaments may become more lax.

The main symptoms of osteoarthritis is chronic pain, causing loss of mobility and often stiffness.

OA can cause a crackling noise (called “crepitus”) when the affected anatomical joint is moved or touched, and patients may experience muscle spasm and contractions in the tendons.

Humid weather increases the pain in many patients.

However, it was concluded that such techniques do not presently predictably restore a durable articular surface to an osteoarthritic joint.

Such procedures are a last resort treatment as they are highly invasive and require substantial periods of recovery.

These procedures are also characterized by relatively long recovery times and are highly invasive procedures.

The currently available therapies are not condro-protective.

However, HTO does not address ligamentous instability—only mechanical alignment.

HTO is associated with good early results, but results typically deteriorate over time.

Further, as with most materials that experience structural loads, particularly cyclic structural loads, both hone and cartilage begin to show signs of failure at loads that are below their ultimate strength.

There is also a level of load at which the skeleton will fail catastrophically.

Accordingly, it has been concluded that the treatment of osteoarthritis and other conditions is severely hampered when a surgeon is not able to precisely control and prescribe the levels of anatomical joint load.

Various of these approaches have had some success in alleviating pain but stiller from patient compliance or lack an ability to facilitate and support the natural motion and function of the diseased anatomical joint.

Therefore, mechanical approaches to treating osteoarthritis have had limited applications.

That is, in addition to addressing loads at an anatomical joint and anatomical joint movement, there has not been an approach which also acknowledges the dampening and energy absorption functions of the anatomy, and taking a minimally invasive approach in implementing solutions.

Images