Method of granulation treatment of raw material for iron making and granulation treatment agent for iron making
A treatment method and treatment agent technology, applied in the direction of improving process efficiency, etc., can solve the problems of reduced strength, deterioration of granulation properties of sintered raw materials, and inability to improve simulated granulation performance.
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0426] Sintered raw materials (raw materials for iron making) having the compositions shown in Table 1 were prepared.
[0427] Composition of raw materials for sintering
Mixing ratio (%)
Niyuman powder ore
20.5
roebriva powder ore
16.5
Karajasu powder ore
13.0
Hamasura powder ore
11.5
Godremuk Powder
10.0
riodse powder ore
3.5
Sintered ore powder
5.0
serpentine
2.0
Silica
1.0
limestone
17.0
Total new raw materials for sintering
100.0
return mine
15.0 (external addition)
powder coke
4.0 (external addition)
[0428]Add 1,400 parts of ground calcium carbonate with an average particle diameter of 2 μm as particles to 70,000 parts of the above-mentioned sintered raw material, put it into a drum mixer, and stir in advance for 1 minute at a rotation speed of 24 / min to obtain a granu...
Embodiment 2
[0431] The granulation process was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, except that 1,400 parts of light calcium carbonate with an average particle diameter of 0.15 μm was used instead of heavy calcium carbonate with an average particle diameter of 2 μm in Example 1. See Table 2 for details of the blending conditions of the fine particles and dispersants used.
[0432] Simultaneously with measuring the water contained in the simulated particles obtained, the simulated particles were classified using a sieve in the same manner as in Example 1, thereby obtaining the average particle diameter and GI index of the simulated particles. Furthermore, the amount of dispersed fine particles was determined by the above-mentioned dispersibility test. These results are summarized in Table 3.
Embodiment 3
[0434] Instead of the ground calcium carbonate with an average particle diameter of 2 μm in Example 1, 1400 parts of ground calcium carbonate with an average particle diameter of 20 μm were used as fine particles, and the same operation as in Example 1 was performed for granulation. See Table 2 for details of the blending conditions of the fine particles and dispersants used.
[0435] Simultaneously with measuring the water contained in the simulated particles obtained, the simulated particles were classified using a sieve in the same manner as in Example 1, thereby obtaining the average particle diameter and GI index of the simulated particles. Furthermore, the amount of dispersed fine particles was determined by the above-mentioned dispersibility test. These results are summarized in Table 3.
PUM
Property | Measurement | Unit |
---|---|---|
The average particle size | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Particle size | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Polydispersity | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com