Silicone defoamer to better control hydrocarbon foam and reduce silicon content of liquid hydrocarbon products
A liquid and foam technology, applied in the field of controlling foaming of hydrocarbon liquids
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Examples
Embodiment 1-4
[0025] Embodiment 1-4-stability test
[0026] The formulations shown in Table I were prepared.
[0027] components
Examples→
1
2
3
4
Cross-linked PDMS
600K cst linear PDMS
100K cst linear PDMS
total
1.01
6.00
-
92.80
99.81
0.52
3.03
-
46.57
50.06
0.52
-
5.70
45.20
51.42
0.52
-
5.60
44.00
50.12
[0028] The formulations of Examples 1-4 were placed into an oven at 120°F (49°C) for storage stability testing. After one week, all samples were clear and free flowing without delamination. At two weeks, all samples had low viscosity with no settling or separation.
[0029] Examples 5 and 6 - Field Test - First Refinery Trial
[0030] Field trials were conducted using the formulation of Example 5 with 93 wt% kerosene, 1% cross-linked PDMS and 6% 600,000 cst linear PDMS. A typical procedure is to first place kerosen...
Embodiment 7-13
[0041] Pilot Plant Testing Using Foam Control Compositions
[0042] The foam control / antifoam agent samples used in Examples 7-13 are described in Table V. The crosslinked branched PDMS formulations (a)-(e) differ from each other in terms of molecular weight and branching agent used. Materials (a) and (c) are alkyl polysilicate crosslinked materials, while materials (b), (d) and (e) are silicone crosslinked materials. The differences between materials (a) and (c) are: (a) contains 40% Indopol L-14 polybutene from BP Chemicals. Material (b) was from 30,000 cst PDMS (the highest molecular weight PDMS in groups (a)-(e)). Materials (d) and (e) have different ratios of PDMS to crosslinker, but as will be seen this does not appear to make much difference. Material (e) and possibly material (de) come from PDMS which has a lower molecular weight than material (a). Amounts reported are in volume percent.
[0043] Table V
[0044] combina...
Embodiment 14
[0053] Example 14 - Second Refinery Trial
[0054] The antifoam compositions of Examples 5 and 6 were tested in a refinery coker producing anode coke. Due in part to the excessive use of defoamers, this operation has been difficult due to silicon in the product poisoning downstream catalysts. This operation has continued for four years using the formulation of Comparative Example 6 (600,000 cst linear PDMS antifoam). The results are shown in Table VII below.
[0055] Table VII
[0056] tank 1
product
Comparative example 6-Si(ppm)
Embodiment 5-Si (ppm) of the present invention
reduce%
LCGO
HCGO
58
38.8
5.5
35.9
10.3
2.2
38%
73%
60%
tank 2
naphtha
LCGO
HCGO
33.8
28.7
1.8
8.2
3.2
0.9
75%
88%
50%
[0057] LCGO = light coker gas oil
[0058] HCGO = heavy coker gas oil
[0059] I...
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com