Monitor Chaining and Docking Mechanism

Abstract

A circuit that supports multiple monitors, docking functions, and protected content via one cable. The circuit includes a receiver that receives multiple video streams, each including respective video data, a mux / demux, coupled to the receiver, that determines which video stream to display on a monitor, a low-voltage differential signaling (LVDS) converter, coupled to the mux / demux, that generates an LVDS signal based on the video data of the determined video stream, an LVDS serializer / deserializer, coupled to the LVDS converter, that generates a signal based on the LVDS signal and sends the signal to a display panel of the monitor for display, a transmitter coupled to the mux / demux, and a transmit physical interface (TPI) coupled to the transmitter. The mux / demux sends at least a remainder of the video streams to the transmitter, which sends them to the TPI, which transmits them as output, useable as input to further instances of the circuit.

Description

CONTINUATION DATA[0001]This application claims benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application 61 / 381,698, titled “Display Port Docking Mechanism”, which was filed Sep. 10, 2010, whose inventors are John F. Sisto and Charles Forni, and which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as though fully and completely set forth herein.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0002]1. Field of the Invention[0003]This invention is related to computer systems, and more particularly, to a mechanism that supports multiple monitors, docking functions, and protected content via a single cable.[0004]2. Description of the Related Art[0005]Modern computer systems often include multiple monitors and other peripheral devices with corresponding communication requirements which may lead to a proliferation of cables that clutter the workspace and may complicate operation and maintenance of the system. Universal Serial Bus (USB) is currently a popular technology that allows both video and other function...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0007]A system, e.g., a circuit such as an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), and method of use are presented. The circuit may include a receiver that supports digital content protection, e.g., a DisplayPort (e.g., v1.2) receiver with High-Bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP), although in other embodiments, other protocols than DisplayPort may be used as desired. The receiver may support multiple data lanes, e.g., up to 4 DisplayPort lanes, as well as an auxiliary channel. The source of the multiple data channels may be a graphics card of a host computer, i.e., a graphics processing unit (GPU), as opposed to the host computer's CPU, which is the data source in prior art solutions, such as those utilizing USB. Thus, this feature of the present approach offloads processing from the host CPU to the GPU, thereby significantly reducing overhead for the CPU.

[0013]Additionally, in some embodiments, the graphics card of the host computer may include multiple Display Port interfaces, which may allow further zero clients to be served from the same host computer. In some embodiments, exposed serial ports, e.g., USB ports, may be provided on each zero client to support HID devices such a mouse, keyboard, and camera, among others, thus allowing respective users to access the host computer independently. As described above, built in HDCP for Display Port may enable content protection to be supported.

Problems solved by technology

Modern computer systems often include multiple monitors and other peripheral devices with corresponding communication requirements which may lead to a proliferation of cables that clutter the workspace and may complicate operation and maintenance of the system.

However, USB based solutions entail a heavy CPU burden, and complex proprietary software generally must be developed and maintained across operating systems.

Moreover, content protection is currently not supported.

Gigabit Ethernet does not have sufficient bandwidth to support uncompressed video, and 10 Gigabit Ethernet is not currently cost effective.

Additionally, compressed video may introduce visual artifacts when video is being displayed to the end user.

Wireless technologies currently are also not suitable due to low bandwidth.

Images