Method of detecting and compensating for injector variability with a direct injection system

Abstract

A method for controlling fuel injection of a direct injection fuel system, the fuel system having a fuel pump, the method comprising: variably operating the fuel pump to maintain a fuel pressure at a selected pressure, temporarily increasing pump operation to increase pressure sufficiently above said selected pressure and then reducing pump operation; during at least a fuel injection subsequent to the reduction in pump operation, correlating pressure decrease to injector operation, and adjusting fuel injection operation based on the correlation.

Description

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY[0001]Fuel injectors of direct injection engine systems often have piece-to-piece and time-to-time variability, due to imperfect manufacturing processes and / or injector aging, for example. This injector variability may cause cylinder torque output imbalance due to the different amount of fuel injected into each cylinder, and may also cause higher tail pipe emission and reduced fuel economy due to an inability to correctly meter the fuel to be injected into each cylinder.[0002]To compensate for injector variability, correction coefficients that correct for injection parameters, such as injection time, may be used. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,176,122 discloses a method that utilizes both average correction coefficients and individual correction coefficients to correct for injector variability. To calibrate the average and individual correction coefficients, calibration injection events are carried out while the fuel supply is stopped during various conditions, s...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The patent text describes a method for calibrating fuel injectors in direct injection engines. The method addresses issues related to injector variability, such as torque output imbalance and increased fuel consumption. The method involves using a higher fuel rail pressure during calibration events, which allows for sufficient fuel injection quantity to sustain the fuel rail pressure drop. This method also avoids or reduces operating injectors at pressures below that appropriate for the current operating conditions, and ensures accurate injector calibration while reducing fuel rail temperature sensitivity and avoiding torque imbalance. The technical effects of this method include improved fuel injection control and reduced fuel consumption.

Problems solved by technology

Fuel injectors of direct injection engine systems often have piece-to-piece and time-to-time variability, due to imperfect manufacturing processes and / or injector aging, for example.

This injector variability may cause cylinder torque output imbalance due to the different amount of fuel injected into each cylinder, and may also cause higher tail pipe emission and reduced fuel economy due to an inability to correctly meter the fuel to be injected into each cylinder.

For example, during a calibration injection event, the fuel rail pressure drop is monitored from a normal operating pressure to a lower threshold pressure, since the lower threshold pressure may be limited by the inability of injectors to accurately meter fuel below a certain pressure, the amount of pressure drop available for a given calibration injection event may therefore be limited.

In other words, the number and size of injections for a given calibration injection event may not be sufficient to accurately calibrate all injectors.

In addition to be above issue, the individual cylinder injector calibration using injector deactivation can result in undesirable air-fuel ratio excursions, un-even torque production from cylinder to cylinder, and increased engine vibration (such as during idle conditions).

Furthermore, when fuel rail pressure is maintained at normal operating pressures, a relatively small amount of fuel may be present in the fuel rail during calibration due to the relatively low fuel pressure.

As such, the small amount of fuel present in the fuel rail may increase fuel metering sensitivity to engine heat, which may in turn degrade calibration results.

This may reduce the fuel rail temperature sensitivity, and thus increase correlation results.

Images