Method for implementing code programming by graphical operations

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for implementing code programming by graphical operations. The method is involved with a node module, a testing environment module, a flow chart module, a function module and a code output module. The node module is used for establishing test nodes corresponding to test programs according to different devices to be tested, related test devices and the corresponding test programs. The testing environment module is used for establishing a current operating environment for the flow chart module according to information of the device to tested, selected by a user. The flow chart module is used by the user to sequentially establish graphic flow charts formed by the test nodes according to the devices predicted for testing and the test nodes selected in correspondence to the corresponding test devices. The function module is used for storing and recording new functions and for supporting function calls regarding to the node module and the flow chart module. The code output module is used for converting the generated graphic flow charts into executable files formed by codes and outputting the files. The method is compatible with various testing environments (operating systems and CPU (central processing unit) environments) and is capable of providing graphical interface editing and testing logics to users and visually displaying the operating process and testing implication of function modules.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to a programming method, in particular to a method for realizing code programming by using graphical operations. Background technique [0002] At present, in the development of software testing, various test logic description methods such as scripts, commands, and charts have emerged. Using scripts to describe the test logic, such as IBM's Rational software, describes the test logic through an industrially standardized scripting language, which is easy to use, maintainable, and expandable, and can well support automated testing. However, for system testing, The test script is less intuitive and requires higher coding ability of testers. [0003] In the field of nuclear power automatic control for board-level testing, a scheme has gradually been formed to execute the test by controlling the test equipment and the object under test for real-time data interaction through the command mechanism. This solution is easy to operate, has ...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0004] 1. Excessive reliance on the participation of testers: testers are required to send corresponding operation commands according to changes in the tested objects and test plans;

[0005] 2. Based on static structure: it can only save test data organized by testers, operation commands and text descriptions of test activities, but it cannot be automatically executed according to existing test cases;

[0006] 3. There is no better command import mechanism: since the commands are implemented through hard coding, new test commands can only be added through the upgrade of the test tool

[0007] In addition, each test program in the prior art has a limited application environment, and testers can only write codes according to the specified script format, which requires higher requirements for testers, and requires testers to be familiar with the function library information, otherwise, improper use will lead to parsing An error prevents the test program from executing

Images