Selection method of low-permeability gas reservoir interference well testing well
A technology that interferes with well testing and low permeability. It is applied in the direction of wellbore/well components, measurement, earthwork drilling and production, etc. It can solve the problems of small pressure changes in interference well testing, small permeability of low permeability gas reservoirs, and pressure interference signals. Difficult to identify and other problems to achieve the effect of saving test time, improving test success rate, and reducing test risk
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0063] A group of gas wells in a low-permeability gas reservoir is selected, and the well selection index of the interference well test is calculated by the present invention to evaluate whether it is suitable for the interference well test.
[0064] The well pair X1 in X gas reservoir is selected, the formation porosity is 4.2%, the fluid viscosity is 0.03mPa·s, the formation average permeability k is 0.26mD; the formation comprehensive compressibility C t 0.011MPa -1 , the gas reservoir temperature T is 150°C, the gas reservoir pressure p is 56.5MPa, the distance L between the observation well and the activation well d is 1600m, the effective thickness h of the formation is 31.2m, the wellbore radius of the observation well is 0.149m, and the open flow rate of the excited well q AOF 76×10 4 m 3 , designed to yield a 53×10 4 m 3 .
[0065] By calculating the pressure guide coefficient is 18759m 2 / ks, and the further calculated response time of the observation well is ...
Embodiment 2
[0067] X2 well pair in X gas reservoir is selected, the formation porosity is 5.3%, the fluid viscosity is 0.03mPa·s, the formation average permeability k is 0.83mD; the formation comprehensive compressibility C t 0.013MPa -1 , the gas reservoir temperature T is 152°C, the gas reservoir pressure p is 58.3MPa, the distance L between the observation well and the activation well d is 1013m, the effective formation thickness h is 28.5m, the wellbore radius of the observation well is 0.062m, and the unimpeded flow rate of the excited well is q AOF 108.6×10 4 m 3 , designed for an output of 82×10 4 m 3 .
[0068] By calculating the pressure guide coefficient is 37287m 2 / ks, and the further calculated response time of the observation well is 1911.2h. Then, the well test analysis software is used to simulate the bottom hole pressure curve of the interference well test observation well, such as Figure 4 As shown, the time required to read the pressure drop of 0.02MPa from the...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Average permeability | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| Average permeability | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More - R&D
- Intellectual Property
- Life Sciences
- Materials
- Tech Scout
- Unparalleled Data Quality
- Higher Quality Content
- 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2025 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com



