Animal litter, process for preparing animal litter, and method for removal of animal waste

a technology for animal litter and animal waste, which is applied in the field of animal litter, process for preparing animal litter, and method for removing animal waste, can solve the problems of litters suffering from certain drawbacks, litters that cannot be reused for future use, and high clay content of litters, so as to reduce the amount of dust, the effect of reducing inconvenience and mess

Inactive Publication Date: 2003-11-06
KENT PET GRP INC
View PDF5 Cites 29 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0013] In one embodiment, the litter includes a first sorbent, which may be selected from the group consisting of a plant meal, grain germ, and mixtures thereof, and a discrete second sorbent, which may be selected from the group consisting of a grain bran, a citrus residue (which may be a pulp or peel residue) and mixtures thereof. The plant meal preferably is a grain meal. The second sorbent preferably is a fibrous sorbent, which is present in the litter in an amount effective to enhance agglomeration of the discrete plural particles of the litter. Preferably, the litter includes a cohesiveness agent, which may be present in an amount effective to enhance the intraparticle cohesion of the particles.
[0048] Other desired properties include biodegradability and tendency to remain clumped over time. Biodegradability is a particularly preferred property when it is desired to dispose of clumps of litter by flushing them into the toilet. The litter of the invention is believed to be at least as biodegradable as other grain-based litters, and thus the litter of the invention may be disposed of by flushing, even into a septic system. Moreover, the litter of the invention exhibits controlled water-absorbing capacity, making it easily flushable down a toilet without excessive expansion. This property can help avoid blockages of drain pipes, e.g., when cat owners flush the soiled litter down the toilet. Tendency to remain clumped refers to the stability of the clump of the soiled litter. A clumping litter should remain clumped for at least 48 hours after the clump has formed. The litters of the invention have an excellent tendency to remain clumped.

Problems solved by technology

The clumped litter can be discarded by the animal owner, leaving behind a quantity of relatively uncontaminated litter for future use.
Although clay-based litters may be functional as clumping animal litters, such litters suffer from certain drawbacks.
For example, one disadvantage of clay litters is the high density of the clay component of the litter.
In addition, the resulting clumps of soiled litter are somewhat heavy, and thus can fracture in the absence of strong interparticle adhesion.
Another disadvantage of clay litters is that, because the clay is not biodegradable, the litter cannot be flushed into some sewage systems after use.
This may be inconvenient for certain animal owners.
Many known grain-based litters, however, also suffer from drawbacks.
Moreover, while grain-based clumping litters may initially form cohesive clumps, the long-term cohesiveness of the formed clumps may be poor.
Thus, while a solid clump may be formed and remain solid for a short period of time, the clump may tend to disintegrate with time or on handling, making it difficult to separate the soiled clumped litter from the unspoiled litter.
Another problem with both clay-based and grain-based clumping litters relates to clumping efficiency, or the amount of litter required to form a clump.
The animal owner thus is forced to replenish the supply of litter frequently.
For various reasons, the products purportedly disclosed in the foregoing patents are believed to be unsatisfactory.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

[0073] This example demonstrates the compositions of various preferred embodiments of the invention. The ingredients are expressed in terms of weight percentage based on the overall weight of the litter:

2TABLE 1 Ingredient % by Weight of Composition Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ground Corn Meal 56.5 66.5 61.5 51.5 66.5 51.5 46.5 56.5 56.5 68.5 Defatted Corn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Germ Meal Ground Virgin 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 5 3 Corn Germ Corn Bran 30 0 0 0 10 15 20 15 10 15 Starch 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Mixture of 0 20 20 30 20 20 20 10 15 0 Ground Citrus Peel and Citrus Pulp Citric Acid 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 NaCl 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Potassium 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sorbate Ingredient % by Weight of Composition Sample 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Ground Corn Meal 63.5 58.5 51.5 56.5 61.5 36.5 41.5 33.5 66.4 66.3 Defatted Corn 0 0 5 5 5 25 25 33 0 0 Germ Meal Ground Virgin 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Corn Germ Corn Bran 20 25 25 20 15 20 15 15 15 15 Starch 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1...

example 2

[0074] This example demonstrates a process for preparing an animal litter that includes a combination of corn meal and corn bran.

[0075] Whole kernel corn, at moisture content of 10-14%, was ground on a Jacobson Hammer Mill using an appropriate screen (1 / 4 in. screen, or 1 / 8 in., {fraction (5 / 32)} in., {fraction (3 / 16)} in., or {fraction (1 / 16)} in. or other screen). The ground corn meal was blended with corn bran, starch, citric acid, and sodium chloride in a mixer, in the proportions indicated in Table 2, then the mixture was pelletized on a pilot-scale California Pellet Mill with a {fraction (3 / 32)} in..times.5 / 8 in. die. Alternatively, a production-scale California Pellet Mill with, for instance, a {fraction (3 / 32)} in., {fraction (5 / 32)} in., or 1 / 8 in. die can be used. Before pelletizing, the blended ingredients can be adjusted to a moisture content of 10-14%, or carried on as-is ("as-is"). The temperature of the pelletizing step was adjusted to 80-95.degree. C. by adding steam...

example 3

[0078] This example demonstrates the effect of adding virgin germ to the litter composition.

[0079] The litter samples in this example were prepared in accordance with Example 2, except that ground virgin corn germ obtained from a corn wet milling process was blended in the mixer with the corn meal, corn bran and other ingredients before pelletizing. The virgin germ was coarsely ground through either a hammer mill or an Alpine mill prior to blending. A fixed amount of ground virgin germ (3% based on the total weight) was used in the formulae while varying the level of corn bran. The results are shown in Table 3.

4 TABLE 3 Percentage based on total weight (as-is) Sample Sample Sample Comparative Ingredients 3-A 3-B 3-C Sample 3-D Ground Corn Meal (1 / 4 in. 68.5 63.5 58.5 66.5 screen) Corn bran 15 20 25 20 Starch 10 10 10 10 Ground virgin germ 3 3 3 0 Sodium Chloride 2 2 2 2 Citric Acid 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Test 5-min. Clump Weight (g) 65.8 66.9 62.9 Ran through

[0080] The data shown in Table ...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
sizeaaaaaaaaaa
temperatureaaaaaaaaaa
densityaaaaaaaaaa
Login to view more

Abstract

Disclosed are animal litters, processes for preparing animal litters, and methods for removal of animal waste. The disclosed litters are made from ingredients including plant meal, grain germ, citrus residue, and grain bran, usually in combination with a cohesiveness agent and a microbial inhibitor. The litters are provided in the form of discrete plural articles which tend to agglomerate when wetted.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS[0001] This application claims priority to two prior U.S. Provisional applications, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial Nos. 60 / 401,510, filed Aug. 7, 2002, and 60 / 332,039, filed Nov. 21, 2001. Both prior applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.[0002] This invention pertains to animal litter. In particularly preferred embodiments, the invention provides a litter for household cats.[0003] Clumping animal litters are typically provided in the form of discrete plural particles. The particles tend to agglomerate into solid masses or clumps when wetted by a liquid waste such as animal urine. A number of such clumping litters are known. One advantage of such clumping litters is that the solid clumps, which are formed upon wetting of the litter, can be separately removed as discrete entities from the remaining litter. The clumped litter can be discarded by the animal owner, leaving behind a quantity of relat...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): A01K1/015B01J20/24B01J20/28
CPCA01K1/0154A01K1/0155B01J20/24B01J2220/485B01J20/2803B01J2220/44B01J20/28016
Inventor WANG, LINWIESNER, THOMAS A.
Owner KENT PET GRP INC
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products