Method and apparatus for measuring strain using a luminescent photoelastic coating
a luminescent photoelastic coating and strain measurement technology, applied in the direction of force measurement, force measurement, force measurement, etc., can solve the problems of limited usefulness, difficult to determine the strain over an entire surface of a structure, and conventional brittle coating techniques can only test a part in one loading configuration, etc., to achieve the effect of improving accuracy
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
Method Flow Chart
[0103]FIG. 6 is a flow chart which lists steps generally used to measure the full-field shear strain and strain orientation on substrate surfaces. The flow chart includes descriptions for specimen preparation, coating, imaging, and analysis, using a typical luminescent photoelastic coating and a measurement system, such as system 100 shown in FIG. 1.
[0104] In step 610, the specimen to be tested is prepared. The specimen is sandblasted, degreased and cleaned. A black undercoat is then applied. In step 620, the specimen is coated. This step can involve applying a single luminescent-photoelastic coating and then curing. Alternatively, step 620 can comprise applying a luminescent undercoat, curing the undercoat, then applying a luminescent-photoelastic overcoat then curing the overcoat. For example, a RhoB / / polyurethane coating (60-80 μm) can be cured under normal room conditions (25 C, 50% -60% RH). A BGM overcoat (200-400 μm) can then be applied and be UV cured at n...
example 2
Luminescent Undercoat Polarized Emission
[0107] A single layer of luminescent photoelastic coating containing a blue emitting dye (0.1%), dissolved in an epoxy monomer (1 g), along with a photocure agent (1%), a thixotropic agent, chloroform (0.25 mL) and toluene (0.25 mL) solvents was sprayed onto a metal surface and cured using UV irradiation (365 nm). A set of four fluorescence spectral scans were performed using a spectrophotometer to determine the degree in which the luminescent photoelastic coating retained the polarization state of the excitation. The excitation (450 nm) was filtered with a linear polarizer in the vertical and horizontal positions. The coating emission was detected thorough a second polarizer in the vertical and horizontal positions relative to each excitation polarizer (a total of four cases: IVV, IVH, IHV, IHH). From the data, the wavelength dependent anisotropy can be calculated as shown in Eqs 4A and 4B: r=IVV-GIVHIVV+2GIVH(4A)G=IHVIHH(4B)
A value of ...
example 3
Shear Strain Data on a Flat Specimen
[0109] An aluminum bar (2.0″×0.5″ in cross-section) was degreased and prepared for undercoat and overcoat application of a two-coating luminescent photoelastic coating as described above. The specimen was placed in an apparatus such that it was simply supported from underneath and loaded with a downward force from above to create a three-point bend as shown in the image provided by FIG. 8A. The coating was excited using a blue LED lamp (λ=465 nm) coupled with a linear polarizer and quarter wave plate. A 600 nm (40 nm bandpass) interference filter was used on the CCD imager to detect and record the emission intensity analogous to system 100 shown in FIG. 1.
[0110] Images were acquired at four analyzer positions for each applied static load condition. FIG. 8A shows processed strain results for a given applied load. Regions of high shear are indicated by white and light gray areas. Clearly present is the spatially varying shear strain field. Beneath...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| thickness | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| thickness | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| wavelength | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


