Eureka AIR delivers breakthrough ideas for toughest innovation challenges, trusted by R&D personnel around the world.

Pretreating cellulosic biomass

a cellulosic biomass and pretreatment technology, applied in the direction of cellulose treatment using microorganisms/enzymes, pulp liquor regeneration, bulk chemical production, etc., can solve the problems of limited bioconversion of plant biomass, large amount of wood material not being used for more traditional structural uses of wood, and large amount of wood material being used for the more traditional structural use of wood. , to achieve the effect of improving the pretreatment effect of cellulosic biomass

Inactive Publication Date: 2009-11-26
APHIOS
View PDF6 Cites 25 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0013]The present invention improves cellulosic biomass pretreatment by using near-critical, critical and supercritical fluids with or without polar cosolvents which have the combined capability to defibrate biomass at low operating temperatures and to fractionate wood into its constituents.

Problems solved by technology

Biomass resources are currently greatly underutilized in the United States.
Thus, a substantial amount of wood material is not utilized for the more traditional structural uses of wood.
The bioconversion of plant biomass is both technically and economically limited by the absence of high yield and low cost conversions technology for lignocellulosic materials.
Paper waste, another underutilized biomass resources, is currently a burden on our overfull landfills.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Pretreating cellulosic biomass
  • Pretreating cellulosic biomass
  • Pretreating cellulosic biomass

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Biomass Raw Materials

[0067]Representative hardwood (red oak), soft wood (white pine) and waste paper (newsprint) were tested. Kiln-dried, “green” oven dried and “green” never-dried red oak and white pine shavings, cubes and chips were tested. White pine and red oak cubes were prepared by cutting kiln-dried boards with an 8″ Craftsman table saw ripped with the grain; these strips were then cross-cut with a Delta bandsaw to produce cubes which are approximately 6 mm on each side. Shavings (approximately 25 mm×6 mm×3 mm) of white pine and red oak were prepared by planting kiln-dried boards on a 6″ Delta joint-planer. “Green” never-dried white pine and red oak chips were prepared making transverse cuts across the diameter of a log from a freshly felled tree. The transverse cuts were made with a newly sharpened chain saw blade to produce thin chips approximately 10 mm×6 mm×1 mm. The “green” never-dried chips were prepared with the courtesy of Professor Robert P. Ordway, Loudon, N.H. News...

example 2

Effect of Residence Time on CBP

[0078]Residence time is a major operating parameter since it impacts process equipment size and process economics. The effect of residence time on the CBP of kiln-dried white pine cubes by supercritical carbon dioxide (SFS CO2) at 10,000 psig and 200° C. is shown in FIG. 7 and detailed in Table 3.

[0079]The experiments listed were conducted with the apparatus shown in FIG. 7 in a non-recycle mode. The listed temperatures and pressures are time-averaged over each run's duration. The biomass recovery efficiency or yield, Eb, is corrected for moisture content before and after ever CBP experiment (for the experiments listed in Table 3, the average moisture content was reduced from 8.87% before to 2.80% after the experiments). The enzymatic hydrolysis conversion efficiency, Ec, is based on the dry weight of biomass recovered after CBP, i.e. Ec is corrected for moisture content and biomass material loss. These qualification, unless otherwise noted, are true f...

example 3

Effect of Pressure on CBP

[0083]The effect of pressure on the pretreatment of kiln-dried white pine cubes by supercritical carbon dioxide at 200° C. for a residence time of 15 minutes is shown in FIG. 8 and detailed in Table 4.

[0084]Pressure and pressure drop are important variables in the critical fluid pretreatment process. Higher pressures are expected to drive more gases into the cells, and increase the pretreatment efficiency by increasing the PV work on decompression. Greater pressure drops on decompression should also improve defibration efficiency and enzymatic hydrolysis susceptibility.

[0085]Pressure and pressure drop were thus seen as very important variables in the CBP process and consequently, among the first to be tested to prove process feasibility. Pressure drop is also seen to be an important economic variable in that PV work can be conserved and recompression energy minimized by limiting the size of the pressure swing. From a practical standpoint, pressure drop may b...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
Timeaaaaaaaaaa
Timeaaaaaaaaaa
Timeaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

The present invention pertains to methods for pretreatment of cellulosic biomass for bioconversion into ethanol and other biofuels and wood-based chemicals, recycling of newsprint and other paper products, microfibrillation of cellulose for use as an additive in the food and cosmetic industries, manufacturing improved hardboard, and producing and improved “super” pulp while reducing chemical usage and spent liquor generation. In particular, the instant invention employs supercritical, critical or near critical fluids with and without polar cosolvents [critical fluid, SuperFluids or SFS] for the pretreatment of cellulosic biomass.

Description

GOVERNMENT SUPPORT[0001]Research leading to this invention was in part funded with Grant No. 90-33610-5111 from the United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0002]The present invention pertains to methods for pretreatment of cellulosic biomass for bioconversion into ethanol and other biofuels and wood-based chemicals, recycling of newsprint and other paper products, microfibrillation of cellulose for use as an additive in the food and cosmetic industries, manufacturing improved hardboard, and producing and improved “super” pulp while reducing chemical usage and spent liquor generation. In particular, the instant invention employs supercritical, critical or near critical fluids with and without polar cosolvents [critical fluid, SuperFluids or SFS] for the pretreatment of cellulosic biomass.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0003]Biomass resources are currently greatly underutilized in the United States. If effectively exploited, these resources can redu...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
IPC IPC(8): D21C3/22D21F1/66
CPCD21C1/10C12P2201/00D21C11/0007D21C5/005Y02P20/54
Inventor CASTOR, TREVOR PERCIVAL
Owner APHIOS
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products