Feed additive compositions

a technology of additive compositions and compositions, applied in the field of feed additive compositions, can solve the problems of low cost method, high cost, and low profit margin in animal husbandry, and achieve the effects of reducing the incidence of diarrhea, and improving the health of non-human animals

Inactive Publication Date: 2019-05-23
NUTRIQUEST LLC
View PDF0 Cites 4 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0017]In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for improving health in non-human animals, the method comprising feeding the non-human animal the feed composition described above. Improving the health of a non-human animal may be selected from reducing incidence of diarrhea, reducing number of days of diarrhea, decreasing mortality, improving intestinal health, reducing microbial pathogens in the intestinal tract of the animal, decreasing cytokine panel measuring TNF-alpha, and combinations thereof. Further, the non-human animal may be a chicken. When the non-human animal is a chicken, improving the health of the chicken comprises reducing the impact of C. perfringens in broilers.
[0018]In yet another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for improving performance of non-human animals, the method comprising feeding the non-human animal the feed composition described above. Improving performance may be selected from increase in body weight gain, feed conversion rate (FCR), feed intake, average daily weight gain (ADG), an increase in average daily food intake (ADFI), an improved overall body weight, and ratio of F / G. The non-human animal may be a chicken.
[0019]In yet another aspect, the present disclosure provides method for improving quality of a product derived from a non-human animal, the method comprising feeding the non-human animal the feed composition described above. Improving the quality of a product derived from a non-human animal may be selected from from improving breast meat yield, reducing product variability, reducing impact on consumer appeal due to poor color, poor texture, and drip loss in retail display, reducing organoleptic qualities in cooked chicken, including incidence of woody breast. The non-human animal may be a chicken.

Problems solved by technology

Farmers engaged in animal husbandry face many challenges.
Global environmental challenges, including global climate changes and the growing threat of disease transmission to and from agricultural animals, add further challenges.
Additionally, farmers need a low cost method to produce these products since the profit margin in these areas can be quite low.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

the Effect of Feeding Ground Peppers to Broilers Challenged with E. maxima and C. perfringens

[0104]This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of ground peppers in broilers challenged with Eimeria maxima and Clostridium perfringens. In this and all subsequent examples, ground peppers refers to encapsulated ground peppers comprising 50% ground peppers and 50% encapsulating material. A total of 256 day-old male Cobb×Cobb chicks were obtained from a commercial hatchery. Chicks were vaccinated for Marek's and reovirus at the hatchery. The birds were randomly assigned to 32 battery cages with eight chicks per cage. A total of five treatments (Table 1) were allotted, resulting in eight cages per treatment. Temperature and lighting were adjusted according to the husbandry guidelines of the Cobb broiler (Cobb, 2012). Each cage was equipped with a feed and water trough. Water and feed were provided ad libitum. The chicks were fed a 22.5% crude protein corn soybean-based diet (Table 2) ...

example 2

the Effect of Feeding Ground Peppers to Broilers Challenged with C. perfringens

[0112]This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of ground peppers at two inclusion levels in broilers raised in pens on new litter and pens top dressed with litter comprising C. perfringens from a previous necrotic enteritis (NE) challenge study (Table 4). A total of 1200 day-old male Ross×Ross chicks were obtained from a commercial hatchery. Chicks were vaccinated for Marek's and reovirus at the hatchery.

TABLE 4Experimental treatmentsLitterStarterGrowerFinisher# ofTreatmentTest productTypeDOT1 0-13DOT 14-35DOT 14-35PensAEncapsulatedNew0.15Kg / ton0.15Kg / ton0.15Kg / ton8ground pepperBEncapsulatedNew0.3Kg / ton0.3Kg / ton0.3Kg / ton8ground pepperCNo AdditiveNewNoneNoneNone8DEncapsulatedReused0.15Kg / ton0.15Kg / ton0.15Kg / ton8ground pepperEEncapsulatedReused0.3Kg / ton0.3Kg / ton0.3Kg / ton8ground pepperFNo AdditiveReusedNoneNoneNone81Day of hatchCapsaicinoid content of encapsulated ground pepper is 0.5%

Experimental D...

example 3

the Effect of Feeding Ground Peppers, Formulated Yeast and a Combination of Ground Peppers and Formulated Yeast to Broilers Challenged with C. perfringens

[0120]This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of ground peppers and formulated yeast fed to broilers challenged with C. perfringens (Table 7). A total of 2000 day-old male Ross×Ross chicks were obtained from a commercial hatchery. Chicks were vaccinated for Marek's and reovirus at the hatchery.

TABLE 7Experimental treatmentsTreat-StarterGrowerFinisher# ofmentTest productDOT1 0-13DOT 14-35DOT 14-35PensANo AdditiveNoneDOT1 14None16BVirginimycin 20 g / ton 20 g / ton 20 g / ton16CFormulated0.5 lb / ton0.5 lb / ton0.5 lb / ton16Dyeast0.3 lb / ton0.3 lb / ton0.3 lb / ton16EncapsulatedEground0.3 lb / ton +0.3 lb / ton +0.3 lb / ton +16pepper0.5 lb / ton0.5 lb / ton0.5 lb / tonEncapsulatedgroundpepper +Formulatedyeast1Day of hatchCapsaicinoid content of encapsulated ground pepper is 0.5%

Experimental Diets

[0121]Feed consisted of non-medicated commercial-type b...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

No PUM Login to view more

Abstract

The present invention provides feed compositions comprising a basal animal diet supplemented with direct fed microbial (DFM) and at least one of a formulated yeast, a capsicum product, and an antimicrobial clay. The feed compositions improve growth, general health, intestinal health, and reduce microbial pathogens in non-human animals fed the feed compositions.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62 / 587,860 filed Nov. 17, 2017, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0002]The present disclosure generally relates to feed additive compositions, methods for improving growth, improving health, improving intestinal health, and the reduction of microbial pathogens in non-human animals.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0003]Animal husbandry is a branch of agriculture concerned with raising, breeding, and day to day care of animals. Farmers engaged in this branch of agriculture produce meat, eggs, milk, and other products for the consumer. Additionally, these farmers are engaged in breeding and raising a wide variety of animals.[0004]Farmers engaged in animal husbandry face many challenges. The demand for food and food products from animal husbandry is anticipated to increase significantly as the population is growing...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): A23K10/18A61K36/81A61K36/06A61K35/742A61K33/00A23K20/10A23K20/195A23K50/75
CPCA23K10/18A61K36/81A61K36/06A61K35/742A61K33/00A23K20/10A23K20/195A23K50/75A23K20/142A23K20/158A23K20/163A23K20/20A61K45/06A61K35/02A61K2300/00A23K10/30
Inventor FRIESEN, KIMWIERNUSZ, CHESTERCOONEY, RYAN
Owner NUTRIQUEST LLC
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products