Method for removing mercury from smoke in coal fired power plant and mercury removing agent used by same

A technology of coal-fired power plants and mercury removal agents, applied in the field of flue gas purification, can solve problems such as high operating costs, difficult reactions, secondary pollution, etc., and achieve high mercury removal efficiency, non-corrosive equipment, and convenient operation

Active Publication Date: 2011-06-22
HUADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ENG & TECH +1
View PDF5 Cites 10 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

However, the process of this method is complicated, and it needs to go through impregnation, drying, activation, calcination and other steps. The process of two or more oxides also includes kneading, drying, activation, drying, etc., resulting in high operating costs.
The other is to add Na to the limestone slurry 2 S solution (patent application CN101850212A), this kind of method is simple to operate, and operating cost is also lower, but needs the elemental Hg in the flue gas and the solid elemental S reaction in the liquid phase in removing elemental Hg reaction, belongs to gas-solid reaction, The reaction is difficult to occur, and a large excess of elemental S is required to achieve high mercury removal efficiency
The unreacted high-concentration elemental S will cause secondary pollution whether it is discharged from the absorption tower with the flue gas or deposited in the gypsum slurry

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Method for removing mercury from smoke in coal fired power plant and mercury removing agent used by same

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment 1

[0023] Embodiment 1: the composition of mercury removal agent: the industrial grade Co of 5 weight parts 3 o 4 and 1000 parts by weight of technical grade CuCl 2 2H 2 O.

[0024] Before adding mercury removal agent: the load in the limestone-gypsum wet desulfurization system is 280MW, SO 2 The inlet concentration is 3000ppm, the desulfurization efficiency is 95%, the denitrification rate is 10%, and the mercury removal rate is 20%.

[0025] Adopt the mercury removal method of the present invention: add the above-mentioned mercury removal agent into the pit of the limestone-gypsum wet desulfurization system, dissolve with the existing limestone slurry in the pit, so that the concentration of the mercury removal agent in the total slurry is 500ppm, and then pump the slurry into the top of the absorption tower; the slurry containing the mercury removal agent is sprayed down in the absorption tower, and the flue gas containing sulfur dioxide that flows upstream is sprayed and ...

Embodiment 2

[0026] Embodiment 2: the composition of mercury removal agent: the industrial grade Co of 7 weight parts 3 o 4 and 1000 parts by weight of technical grade CuCl 2 2H 2 O.

[0027] Before adding mercury removal agent: the load in the limestone-gypsum wet desulfurization system is 330MW, SO 2 The inlet concentration is 3500ppm, the desulfurization efficiency is 92%, the denitrification rate is 15%, and the mercury removal rate is 40%.

[0028] Using the mercury removal method of the present invention: add the above-mentioned mercury removal agent to the pit of the limestone-gypsum wet desulfurization system, use the existing limestone slurry in the pit and add process water to dissolve, so that the mercury removal agent is in the total slurry The concentration in the mercury is 600ppm, and then the slurry is pumped into the top of the absorption tower with a pit pump; the slurry containing the mercury removal agent is sprayed down in the absorption tower, and the flue gas con...

Embodiment 3

[0029] Example 3: The composition of the mercury removal agent: 10 parts by weight of cobalt oxide and 1000 parts by weight of copper chloride.

[0030] Before adding mercury removal agent: the load in the limestone-gypsum wet desulfurization system is 330MW, SO 2 The inlet concentration is 5000ppm, the desulfurization efficiency is 90%, the denitrification rate is 20%, and the mercury removal rate is 30%.

[0031] Adopt the mercury removal method of the present invention: add the above-mentioned mercury removal agent into the limestone slurry used in the limestone-gypsum wet desulfurization system, the concentration of the mercury removal agent in the total slurry is 1000ppm, stir and mix; Sprayed into the absorption tower, the sprayed slurry directly contacts with the sulfur dioxide-containing flue gas countercurrently going up, and the absorption reaction takes place, and the reacted slurry is oxidized by the air blown by the oxidation fan. After stable operation, the desu...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

No PUM Login to view more

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for removing mercury from smoke in a coal fired power plant and a mercury removing agent used by the same. In the term of the weight percent, the mercury removing agent is prepared from cobalt oxide and copper chloride in a mass ratio of (5-10):1000 through mixing. The mercury removing agent adopted in the invention can be directly used in a limestone- gypsum wet desulphurization system, is simple in use and convenience for use without reconstructing the traditional equipment and is low in cost; and the method for removing mercury by using the mercury removingagent has the advantages of high mercury removing efficiency, difficulty in corrosion to the device, and no generation of secondary pollution, can be used for oxidizing NO in the smoke into NO2 easily dissolved into water, and realizes the effect of removing mercury and NOx simultaneously.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to a method for removing mercury from flue gas of a coal-fired power plant and a mercury removing agent used therefor, and belongs to the technical field of flue gas purification. Background technique [0002] The burning of coal is one of the biggest sources of pollution that causes the deterioration of my country's ecological environment. where SO 2 Pollution has been basically controlled, NO x Emission standards will also be promulgated in the "Twelfth Five-Year Plan", and it is imperative to control Hg emission standards. The current mature mercury removal technology is activated carbon injection. However, the cost of mercury removal by this method is quite expensive. According to the estimate of the US Department of Energy, the operating cost of activated carbon injection is 25,000-70,000 US dollars per ton of mercury, which is unbearable for many power plants. Recently, the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Elec...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(China)
IPC IPC(8): B01D53/64B01D53/80
Inventor 李建浏陶爱平沈煜晖苏军划金颖姗
Owner HUADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ENG & TECH
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products