Multi-component substance high performance liquid detection and analysis method
An analytical method and high-performance liquid phase technology, applied in the fields of detection and chemical analysis and detection, can solve the problems of high purchase cost of equipment, cumbersome work, few types of detection, analysis and detection, etc. Check the effect of analysis results
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0044] (1) Preparation of the test solution
[0045] Accurately weigh 6.25 mg each of the 14 substances in Table 1, dissolve and dilute with methanol to a solution with a concentration of 0.25 μg / ml to obtain the test solution.
[0046] (2) need testing solution is crossed reversed-phase liquid phase chromatographic column and is separated and analyzed;
[0047] Chromatographic conditions:
[0048] Detection wavelength: 220nm
[0049] Flow rate: 1.0ml / min
[0050] Column temperature: 40°C
[0051] Injection volume: 20μl
[0052] Chromatographic column: Agilent InfinityLab poroshell 120EC-C18 150m×4.6mm 4μm
[0053] Mobile phase A: methanol-water-phosphoric acid
[0054] Mobile Phase B: Methanol
[0055] In mobile phase A, methanol, water and phosphoric acid were mixed in a volume ratio of 500:500:0.4. The phosphoric acid is an 85% aqueous phosphoric acid solution by volume.
[0056] Carry out gradient elution according to the following table:
[0057]
[0058] The...
Embodiment 2
[0064] The difference between Example 2 and Example 1 is that in the mobile phase A of Example 2, methanol, water and phosphoric acid are mixed in a volume ratio of 450:550:0.6. And embodiment 2 carries out gradient elution according to the table:
[0065]
[0066] The experimental detection results of Example 2 are shown in Table 3.
[0067] table 3
[0068]
[0069] The detection result chromatogram of embodiment 2 is as Figure 4 Shown (27.670 is the detection peak of S element, which is not within the statistical range of this experiment). From Table 3 and Figure 4 It can be seen that, with the detection and analysis method of Example 2, except for the resolution between Irgafos126 and Irgafos168oxide which is 1.26, the minimum resolution among other components is greater than 2, and the peak shape of each component is good.
Embodiment 3
[0071] The difference between Example 3 and Example 1 is that the mobile phase A of Example 3 does not contain phosphoric acid, that is, in the mobile phase A of Example 3, methanol and water are mixed at a volume ratio of 500:500. The experimental detection results of Example 3 are shown in Table 4.
[0072] Table 4
[0073]
[0074] The detection result chromatogram of embodiment 3 is as Figure 5 (27.433 is the detection peak of S element, which is not within the statistical range of this experiment). From Table 4 and Figure 5 It can be seen that the detection and analysis method of Example 3 has a minimum resolution of 1.64 among the components, and the resolution is greater than 1.5. Except for Fenoksan, the peak shapes of the chromatograms of other components are all good.
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


