Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Methods for screening compound libraries

a compound library and library technology, applied in chemical libraries, combinational chemistry, component separation, etc., can solve the problems of inability to identify compounds having the desired biological activity, need to keep track, and inability to screen each compound individually, so as to reduce the screening time for each library, shorten the break through time, and achieve the effect of weak affinity for the target receptor

Inactive Publication Date: 2004-03-18
HINDSGAUL OLE +1
View PDF19 Cites 3 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0158] A particular advantage of the present method is that compound libraries containing isomers may be screened to determine, for example, if only one isomer (e.g. an enantiomer or diastereomer) is binding to the target receptor, or if the isomers have different affinities for the target receptor. In this regard, if the isomers have different affinities for the target receptor, a different break through time will be observed for each isomer.
[0193] Alternatively, the indicator compound and the void marker compound, without the compound library, can be applied or infused into the column after equilibration or partial equilibration of the column with the compound library. This technique allows very strongly bound ligands or those with slow off rates to be detected.

Problems solved by technology

The traditional approach of screening each compound individually in an assay to identify those compounds having the desired biological activity is no longer practical due to time and resource constraints.
While such methods can be effective, the need to keep track of individual members of the library during their synthesis and screening is quite cumbersome and often limits the type of synthetic procedures that can be employed.
Additionally, many of these techniques require that the synthetic procedures be conducted on a solid phase, thus further limiting the synthetic procedures and reagents that can be used.
There are several disadvantages associated with the "capture and release" methods for screening compound libraries that have been previously reported.
First, the procedure used to "release" the bound ligands from the ligand-receptor complexes may alter the binding profile for the various bound ligands, resulting in a false indication of binding strength.
For example, using a pH gradient to release the bound members of the library may change the electronic character of the binding site on the receptor causing ligands which are strongly bound under physiological conditions to be prematurely released.
Thus, the characterization of binding strength for various ligands based on their relative time of release may be misleading if the release conditions are different from the binding conditions.
Accordingly, these methods may not accurately identify the most active members of a compound library.
Additionally, certain conditions used for compound release, such as pH gradients, may irreversibly denature the receptor thus preventing its subsequent use for screening compound libraries.
Additionally, when "capture and release" methods are employed, each bound ligand is typically released over a relatively short period of time resulting, for example, in an elution peak or "spike" for each ligand.
Thus, the number of analyses that can be conducted using any particular mass spectrometer is limited.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Methods for screening compound libraries
  • Methods for screening compound libraries
  • Methods for screening compound libraries

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Screening of an Oligosaccharide Library Using FC-MS

[0210] In this example, a compound library containing a mixture of six oligosaccharides was screened using frontal chromatography in combination with an electrospray mass spectrometer to determine the relative affinity of the oligosaccharides for a monoclonal antibody that recognizes the 3,6-dideoxy-D-galactose (abequose) epitope in Salmonella paratyphi B O-antigens.

[0211] The compound library consisted of the following six oligosaccharides: .alpha.GalNAc(1.fwdarw.3).beta.Gal-OGr (compound 1); .alpha.Gal(1.fwdarw.3)[.alpha.Fuc(1.fwdarw.2)].beta.Gal-OGr (compound 2); .alpha.Man(1.fwdarw.3)[.alpha.Man(1.fwdarw.6)].beta.Man-OGr (compound 3); .alpha.Abe(1.fwdarw.3).alpha.Tal-OCH.sub.3 (compound 4); .alpha.Gal(1.fwdarw.2)[.alpha.Abe(1.fwdarw.3)].alpha.Man-OCH.sub.3 (compound 5); and .alpha.Glc(1.fwdarw.4).beta.Glc(1.fwdarw.4).alpha.Gal(1-.fwdarw.2)-[.alpha.Abe(1.fwdarw.3)].alpha.Man(1.fwdarw.3).alpha.Glc(1.fwda-rw.4).beta.Glc-OCH.sub.3 (...

example 2

Screening of an Oligosaccharide Library Using FC-MS and an Indicator Compound

[0223] In this example, the use of an indicator compound to screen a compound library is demonstrated. The antibody used in this example was the same as that used in Example 1, i.e., a monoclonal antibody that recognizes the 3,6-dideoxy-D-galactose (abequose) epitope in Salmonella paratyphi B O-antigens. The column was also essentially the same as the column in Example 1 and it was prepared and operated as described therein.

[0224] In this experiment, three solutions were prepared. Solution A contained the following four oligosaccharide in 2 mM NH.sub.4OAc: .alpha.GalNAc(1.fwdarw.3).beta.Gal-OGr (compound 1); .alpha.Gal(1.fwdarw.3)[.alpha.Fuc(1.fwdarw.2)].beta.Gal-OGr (compound 2);

[0225] .alpha.Man(1.fwdarw.3)[(.alpha.Man(1.fwdarw.6)].beta.Man-OGr (compound 3); .alpha.Abe(1.fwdarw.3).alpha.Tal-OCH.sub.3 (compound 4), wherein Gr=O(CH.sub.2).sub.8CO.sub.2CH.sub.3. Solution B contained

[0226] .alpha.Gal(1.fwdarw...

example 3

Screening of an Oligosaccharide Library Using FC-MS

[0230] In this example, a compound library containing a mixture of four oligosaccharides was screened using frontal chromatography in combination with an electrospray mass spectrometer to determine the relative affinity of the oligosaccharides for cholera toxin B subunit.

[0231] The compound library consisted of the following four oligosaccharides: .alpha.GalNAc(1.fwdarw.3).beta.Gal-OGr (compound 1); .alpha.Gal(1.fwdarw.3)[.alpha.Fuc(1.fwdarw.2)].beta.Gal-OGr (compound 2); .alpha.Man(1.fwdarw.3)[.alpha.Man(1.fwdarw.6)].beta.Man-OGr (compound 3); and GM.sub.1 oligosaccharide (compound 7, wherein Gr=O(CH.sub.2).sub.8CO.-sub.2CH.sub.3. Compound 7, which is the natural ligand for cholera toxin B subunit, was obtained using the procedures described in A. Schon et al., "Thermodynamics of Intersubunit Interactions in Cholera Toxin upon Binding to the Oligosaccharide Portion of Its Cell Surface Receptor, Ganglioside G.sub.M1" Biochem. 1989, ...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
internal diameteraaaaaaaaaa
temperatureaaaaaaaaaa
internal diameteraaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

Disclosed are methods for screening compound libraries using frontal chromatography in combination with mass spectrometry to identify and rank those members of the library that bind to a target receptor. Methods are also disclosed which permit a compound library to be rapidly screened to determine if any member of the library has an affinity for the target receptor as measured by a pre-selected indicator compound.

Description

[0001] This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. ______, filed Dec. 28, 1998 (Attorney Docket No. 026579-248); which application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09 / 070,131, filed Apr. 29, 1998, now abandoned; which application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60 / 079,622, filed Mar. 27, 1998. Each of these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.[0002] 1. Field of the Invention[0003] This invention relates to methods for screening compound libraries, such as compound libraries generated using combinatorial chemistry techniques. The methods of this invention employ frontal chromatography in combination with mass spectrometry to screen a library of compounds to identify and rank those members of the library that bind to a target receptor. The methods of this invention also permit a compound library to be rapidly screened to determine if one or more members of the library have an affinity for a target receptor as mea...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): C40B30/08C40B40/12C40B40/18G01N30/46G01N30/62G01N30/72G01N33/538G01N33/543G01N33/68H01J49/04
CPCB01J2219/00585Y10T436/24B01J2219/00707B01J2219/00731B01J2219/00738B01J2219/00745B01J2219/00747C40B30/08C40B40/12C40B40/18G01N30/466G01N30/7266G01N33/538G01N33/54306G01N33/54366G01N33/68G01N33/6845G01N33/6848G01N2030/628H01J49/00H01J49/0036B01J2219/00704
Inventor HINDSGAUL, OLESCHRIEMER, DAVID C.
Owner HINDSGAUL OLE
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products