Molding a lightweight cast acoustical product
a technology of lightweight cast and acoustic panels, which is applied in the field of casting sound absorption products, can solve the problems of increasing the product density, not all surfactants or foaming agents are useful in the preparation of lightweight acoustic panels,
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
Preparation of Test Boards
[0046]A base formula for a pulp for acoustical panels is shown in Table I. Starch, boric acid and stucco were weighed out into separate cups. 350 Grams of cold water was measured and placed into a small metal beaker. The dry ingredients were added to the cold water while stirring, first adding the starch, then the boric acid and finally the stucco. 2571 Grams of boiling water was added to the mixture. The mixture was stirred to achieve a homogeneous gel. Mineral wool was measured to 871 grams and placed in a HOBART® mixer. The gel was added to the mixer and mixed for 45 seconds at speed 1, forming a pulp. Unblended ingredients on the side of the mixing bowl were pushed down into the pulp and the pulp was mixed for an additional three minutes at speed 2.
TABLE IPULP BASE FORMULAWeight,Weight PercentPercent TotalComponentgramsSolidsWeightCold Water3500.0%8.5%Hot Water25710.0%62.5%Starch17514.7%4.2%Boric Acid7.50.6%0.2%Stucco14111.8%3.4%Mineral Wool87172.9%21.2...
example 2
Test Board Properties
[0049]Physical properties of each of the test boards made in Example 1 were measured. Results are shown in Table III.
TABLE IIITEST BOARD PROPERTIESSampleThicknessDensityMORCMORMOEHardness1C0.85522.01228.8228.633570291.310.76921.53235.8246.437226298.820.76920.97175.1192.725485235.930.75521.45226.3238.134952312.640.73821.45180.7190.228415226.050.78120.40184.3214.131388256.060.75121.46189.2199.031985263.170.78020.85224.2249.635751309.880.76221.48201.7211.628249254.190.80121.16197.5233.036063258.8100.79520.65188.4213.631305268.6110.75321.54236.8247.023397304.6120.74421.97186.9187.410111266.9130.83319.99199.0241.028310226.1140.71721.36177.1206.812840212.2150.79720.54192.3220.715892247.5160.77421.18188.0202.810161253.0170.79221.33193.6226.819685250.1180.76621.34192.0203.713406286.2190.81619.55203.0257.019022231.2200.82818.19128.2187.55691134.1210.82319.11182.3241.515270216.1220.81416.58123.2217.15597151.2230.81519.07160.8214.110423204.5240.81515.31119.7246.95350105.12...
example 3
Preparation of Test Samples
[0052]The most promising foaming agents identified in the screening tests of Examples 1 and 2 were selected for additional testing. Samples of the pulp base formula were prepared according to Example 1 with foaming agents, if present, added according to Table IV.
TABLE IVCOMPOSITION OF TEST BOARDS% FoamingBoardFoaming AgentAgentThickness1CNoneNone0.8551Linear Sodium Alkylbenzene0.10%0.807Sulfonate2Linear Sodium Alkylbenzene0.20%0.825Sulfonate3Linear Sodium Alkylbenzene0.30%0.817Sulfonate4Linear Sodium Alkylbenzene0.40%0.843Sulfonate5Linear Sodium Alkylbenzene0.50%0.823Sulfonate6Cocamidopropyl Betaine0.10%0.7987Cocamidopropyl Betaine0.20%0.8098Cocamidopropyl Betaine0.30%0.8259Cocamidopropyl Betaine0.40%0.77010Cocamidopropyl Betaine0.50%0.82311Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine0.10%0.80712Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine0.20%0.85613Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine0.30%0.79014Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine0.40%0.80615Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine0.50%0.80016Disodium ...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| density | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| temperature | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| size | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


