Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Artificial selection method and reagents

Inactive Publication Date: 2012-06-07
AGRI VICTORIA SERVICES PTY LTD
View PDF0 Cites 5 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0025]By “founder” is meant an individual in a pedigree for which both parents are not known. Founders can be used in the method described herein in place of ancestors for when the known pedigree is incomplete and / or the genotypes of the ancestors are not known or able to be derived. The present invention has utility where genotypes of a founder population are used to infer the genotypes of the current population, however this is less preferred than using genotypes of the ancestors because it is expected that there are fewer key ancestors than founders. As the invention has a high level of accuracy when using genotypes of founders, the founder population can also serve as a suitable model for an ancestor population.
[0041]“Reference” means a parent or ancestor (and / or founder) that provides a genetic contribution to a number of groups of individuals, thereby permitting comparison of the performances of the progeny within and between groups relative to the performance of progeny from other parents or ancestors (and / or founders). References permit the best ancestors (and / or founders) to be selected and used in artificial selection.
[0053]In work leading to the present invention, the inventors reasoned that costs for selecting individuals from a population can be reduced if the selection candidates could be genotyped for a relatively small number of markers and preferably a constant set of markers. The inventors reasoned that such cost savings would be realized by genotyping the key ancestors of the selection candidates for useful markers, and preferably for all useful markers, and the selection candidates are genotyped for only a subset of those markers, and this is achievable by tracing chromosome segment(s) carrying the useful markers in a selection candidate to the corresponding chromosome segment(s) in a key ancestor from which the selection candidate has been derived. This would then make is possible for the markers genotyped on the chromosome segment of the key ancestor to be inferred for the corresponding chromosome segment of the selection candidate.
[0056]The present invention is predicated on an understanding by the inventor that, for species having a small effective population size, the number of key ancestors (and often the number of founders) is small relative to the number of selection candidates. Therefore there is a saving in cost if the selection candidates are genotyped for only a subset of the markers whose genotyped are known or can be inferred on the key ancestors (and / or founders). It is possible to infer the missing genotypes of the selection candidates because the relationship between the selection candidates and the key ancestors (and / or founders) is known from the pedigree or inferred from other genetic markers. Methods of inferring missing genotypes that do not take advantage of the relationship between the selection candidates and the key ancestors (and / or founders) would be much less efficient and so the cost savings would be much less.
[0057]Moreover, the inventor has reasoned that basing informativeness of tagged markers on pedigree can derive additional cost-savings for genotyping individuals in a current population. More particularly, the inventor has reasoned that, for a species having a small effective population size, the diversity of the population is explained substantially by the sum those key ancestors (and / or founders) making a long term contribution to the population, and that diversity is inherited as neighbourhoods of chromosomal segments comprising ancestral markers, which may be in linkage disequilibrium (LD). Proceeding on this basis, the inventor has reasoned that the number of informative markers to be genotyped in an individual in a current population is reduced by inferring missing genotypes of a chromosome segment of an ancestor (and / or founder) contributing that chromosome segment to be the same as in the individual of the current population, and genotyping an informative marker within the chromosome segment. This differs from known tagging SNP methods which are independent of pedigree and generally require larger numbers of markers to be genotyped because they are based on haplotype blocks or a union of haplotype blocks, or require detailed metric LD maps.

Problems solved by technology

Genotype information for an ancestor, as opposed to a founder, is generally incomplete as a consequence of poor record keeping and the absence of genetic material e.g., semen, from the ancestor to permit genotyping, such that missing genotypes of the ancestral population must be inferred to complete a genotype analysis.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Artificial selection method and reagents
  • Artificial selection method and reagents
  • Artificial selection method and reagents

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Model Artificial Selection Method for a Holstein Cattle Population

Rationale

[0289]Many breeds of livestock have a small effective population size of 50-100, including the Holstein cattle population. This means that most chromosome segments found in animals of the current generation trace back to one of less than about 100 key ancestors within a few generations. This short coalescence time means that the chromosome segments are large and could be recognised by their haplotype at a group of markers. Consequently we can carry out ‘in silico’ genotyping as follows:[0290]1. Genotyping key ancestors for a dense set of markers;[0291]2. Genotyping individuals of the current population / generation for sufficient markers to permit chromosome segments to be matched to the segments carried by the key ancestors; and[0292]3. Inferring genotypes of individuals in the current population / generation to be the same as those of the key ancestor or founder for the matching chromosome segment.

[0293]By this...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
Volumeaaaaaaaaaa
Volumeaaaaaaaaaa
Volumeaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

The present invention provides methods for estimating the breeding value of individuals in populations such as those having small effective population size (Ne) e.g., to identify selection candidates having high breeding values, wherein the methods comprise inferring one or more genotypes for one or more markers at a locus or QTL to be the same as for an ancestor or founder or a subset of ancestors and / or founders from which a corresponding chromosome segment is derived and estimating the breeding value of the individual based on the inferred genotype(s).

Description

RELATED APPLICATION DATA[0001]This application is claims priority under the Paris Convention to U.S. Ser. No. 60 / 876,623 filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Dec. 21, 2006, the details of which are incorporated herein in their entirety.FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0002]The present invention relates generally to the field of artificial selection, including the breeding of commercially-important animals and plants, and more specifically to methods and reagents for marker-assisted selection in animals and plants.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0003]Artificial selection programs are mainly concerned with increasing genetic gain by virtue of the contributions of more genes from “good” ancestors. The traditional means for determining genetic gain expresses gain as the product of selection intensity, accuracy, and genetic standard deviation defined in a single generation. Woolliams et al., Genetics 153, 1009-1020 (1999) showed that the process of contributing genes to a populati...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
IPC IPC(8): A01K67/00G06F19/20
CPCC12Q1/68C12Q1/6888A01K67/02
Inventor HAYES, BENGOODDARD, MICHAEL
Owner AGRI VICTORIA SERVICES PTY LTD
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products