Catalyst compositions and their use for hydrogenation of nitrile rubber

Abstract

This invention relates to novel catalyst compositions based on Ruthenium- or Osmium-based complex catalysts of the Grubbs-Hoveyda, Grela or Zhan type and specific co-catalysts comprising at least one vinyl group, pref. ethyl vinyl ether, and to a process for selectively hydrogenating nitrile rubbers in the presence of such catalyst compositions, preferably with a preceding metathesis step using the same complex catalyst as in the hydrogenation step.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0001]This invention relates to novel catalyst compositions based on Ruthenium- or Osmium-based complex catalysts with metathetic activity and specific co-catalysts in a certain molar ratio and to a process for selectively hydrogenating nitrile rubbers in the presence of such novel catalyst compositions.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0002]The term “acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber” or “nitrile rubber”, also named as “NBR” for short, shall be interpreted broadly and refers to rubbers which are copolymers or terpolymers of at least one α, β-unsaturated nitrile, at least one conjugated diene and, if desired, one or more further copolymerizable monomers.[0003]Hydrogenated NBR, also referred to as “HNBR” for short, is produced commercially by hydrogenation of NBR. Accordingly, the selective hydrogenation of the carbon-carbon double bonds in the diene-based polymer must be conducted without affecting the nitrile groups and other functional groups (such as carboxyl groups ...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The present invention relates to a process for making a high-quality hydrogenated nitrile rubber (HNBR) with a low level of catalyst residue. The process uses a highly active catalyst system. The amount of catalyst used can be reduced or even eliminated by using ion-exchange resins. The hydrogenation reaction results in a high-quality HNBR with a preferred viscosity range. The hydrogenated nitrile rubber can be made from copolymers or terpolymers of α,β-unsaturated nitrile, conjugated diene, and other monomers. The use of specific conjugated dienes like 1,3-butadiene, isoprene, or mixtures thereof is preferred. This process simplifies the steps required to make high-quality HNBR.

Problems solved by technology

Such processes suffer from drawbacks such as high prices for the catalyst metals and the cost involved in catalyst metal removal / recycle.

However, they are prone to gel formation and may cause a certain degree of cross-linking during hydrogenation.

Therefore, these types of Os or Ru catalysts can not be used for NBR metathesis / degradation to produce NBR with reduced molecular weight.

Another problem of the HNBR production is that HNBR with a low Mooney viscosity is difficult to manufacture by the direct hydrogenation of commercially available NBR.

The relatively high Mooney viscosity places restrictions on the processability of HNBR.

Thus, the Mooney viscosity range of marketed HNBR is limited by the lower limit of the Mooney viscosity of the NBR starting material.

Secondly, the molar mass of the NBR feedstock to be used for the hydrogenation cannot be reduced at will since otherwise work-up in the NBR industrial plants available is no longer possible because the rubber becomes too sticky.

However, WO-A-2005 / 080456 does not provide any disclosure or teaching how to influence the two simultaneously occurring reactions, i.e. metathesis and hydrogenation or how to control the activity of the respective catalysts regarding metathesis and hydrogenation.

However, WO-A-2011 / 079799 does not provide any disclosure or teaching how to influence the different catalytic activities of the catalysts for depolymerisation (metathesis) and hydrogenation.

It is accepted that while hydrogenation takes place simultaneously metathesis leads to a degradation of the molecular weight in uncontrolled manner.

However, there is no disclosure at all about polymer degradation via metathesis or hydrogenation of unsaturated polymers.

However, this reference does not deal with hydrogenation processes subsequently to olefin metathesis at all.

It can be seen from the above that:(1) up to now, hydrogenation catalysts which are very active for the selective hydrogenation of nitrile rubbers are known and Rh- and Pd-based catalysts are already used in industrial hydrogenation processes; however, cheaper Ru-based hydrogenation catalysts are still facing the gel formation problem when used for NBR hydrogenation.

However, hitherto there is not a single literature reporting the preparation of hydrogenated nitrile rubber with controlled molecular weight and therefore controllable Mooney viscosity only using one kind of ruthenium- or osmium-based catalyst which is otherwise known for its metathetic activity.

Also, up to now, there is no hydrogenation catalyst which can be used at a very low concentration for NBR hydrogenation to high conversion.

Images