Customized Dental Prosthesis For Periodontal or Osseointegration and Related Systems

Abstract

Custom dental prosthesis or implants each individually designed and manufactured to replace nonfunctional natural teeth positioned in a jawbone of a specific pre-identified patient are provided. An example dental prosthesis / implant includes a dental implant body having a prosthesis interface formed therein to receive an occlusally-facing dental prosthesis component. The prosthesis interface has a custom three-dimensional surface shape positioned and formed to create a form locking fit with respect to the occlusally-facing dental prosthesis component when positioned thereon.

Description

RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]This patent application is a non-provisional continuation application and claims priority to and the benefit of now-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13 / 247,843, filed on Sep. 28, 2011, which itself claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61 / 454,450 filed on Mar. 18, 2011, and which is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12 / 763,001, filed Apr. 19, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,602,780, and is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11 / 724,261, filed Mar. 15, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,708,557, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11 / 549,782 filed on Oct. 16, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,454,362, each incorporated by reference in its entirety.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0002]1. Field of the Invention[0003]The invention relates generally to the field of dentistry, and more particula...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0028]In view of the foregoing, various embodiments of the present invention beneficially provide customized dental prosthesis and implants based on a process or processes that include copying a significant portion of the original root geometry of a human tooth, to be integrated after extraction of the original tooth either in the existing biological cell structure of the periodontal ligament or as one piece into the embedding bone structure of the respective jaw. In an embodiment, primary stability is favorably achieved by a custom made splint that connects the prosthesis with the adjacent tooth or teeth or other dental structures like existing implants, bridges and the like. According to various embodiments of the present invention, an artificial root of the prosthesis or implant can be osseointegrated—embedded into the natural extraction cavity. According to various embodiments of the present invention, the principle of the natural mechanism of holding the teeth in the jaw structure of a dental patient is maintained and preserved, whereby a customized dental prosthesis is integrated into, healed in, and at least partially adopted by the fibrous connective tissue interface of the anatomical structure of an individual patient that is naturally holding the tooth.

[0029]The concept of periodontal integration of an artificial tooth uses the existing human periodontal ligament for integration and is certainly less invasive than the integration of osseointegrated implants. The concept of integrating a one-piece prosthesis that includes a root-shape part, an abutment and a crown combines the two clinical episodes of integrating the root-shaped part and adapting the crown into one clinical event. Even if such one-piece prosthesis would include an assembly of two or more parts, the assembly would be fabricated in the controlled environment of a dental laboratory or an industrial fabrication. As a result, the quality of the interface sealing between such parts can be expected to be of higher quality as produced in the mouth of the patient. This would reduce the infection rate so that the success rate of the one-piece prosthesis according to an embodiment of the invention would be higher as achieved with implementations according to the prior art. The concept of a splint that is custom made in the laboratory in advance serves two purposes: the correct positioning of the prosthesis, and the achievement of reasonable primary stability. The concept of using in-vivo imaging data in order to design and fabricate the prosthesis prior to the extraction of the teeth of interest enables a laboratory lead time prior to the invasive clinical event. The concept of using data to design a root-shaped portion or portions of the prosthesis not actually of the tooth or teeth extracted or to be extracted, but of the anatomical alveolar structure, allows the prosthesis to adapt to the post-extraction or even post-surgical—in case of, for example, surgical extensions to the extraction socket—shape of the alveolar situation.

Problems solved by technology

Although various preventive measures, like frequent tooth brushing and flossing, and drinking fluoridized or iodized water are widely accepted and used, the great majority of people are sooner or later challenged with dental fillings, restorations implants, and / or prostheses.

Generally, the number of available restorative and prosthetic options is limited.

Osseointegrated implants are drastically invasive and the gingiva-implant interface is often the cause of chronic local infection.

Additionally, all the aforementioned restorative and prosthetic options have a limited average lifetime.

However, if the loss of tooth substance is severe, this may not be applicable.

Bacterial infections can be caused if the sealing is compromised in regards to its short, mid and long-term stability.

The first joint between the implant screw and abutment is especially under the static and dynamic stress of mastication forces, and is exposed as an area where bacteria may congregate, causing a chronically infection.

Although such ceramic materials are due to its internal crystal structure and mechanisms able to suppress micro-cracks, it has been reported that in the moist-warm environment of the human body the long term stability of yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramics is compromised to the extent that respective dental implants cannot be considered fracture-safe for the life-time expectations established in the industry.

However, the success rate and the in-vivo life time of osseointegrated dental implants are limited, and the surgical procedure is heavily invasive, because the bone needs to be drilled or ground in order to be adapted to the shape of the non-customized implants.

Furthermore, osseointegrated implants are a limiting factor in a later orthodontic treatment.

In cases where a tooth is not severely damaged, and would be ready to receive a partial restoration, but an intra-oral repair is impossible due to access problems, or a reverse root canal treatment is required, an alternative method is the intentional re-implantation.

A disadvantage relating to all such techniques is certainly that the specific tooth to be reimplanted or transplanted still needs an overall reasonable condition and prognosis to justify an intentional re-implantation and that only certain root and root canal deficiencies can be repaired this way.

However, despite the apparent success, most of them show localized ankylosis and gross resorption of the root at the end of this time.

All such restorative and prosthetic options and methodologies are deficient—being heavily invasive and / or limited in their respective scope.

There is also no prior recognition of fabricating the root-shaped custom portions of the prosthesis based on anatomical imaging data prior to the extraction of the tooth or of the teeth of interest or directly of the alveolar situation.

Images