Active, heterogeneous bi- or tri-dentate catalyst
a bior tridentate catalyst, heterogeneous technology, applied in catalyst activation/preparation, chemical/physical processes, group 3/13 element organic compounds, etc., can solve the problems of metallocene sensitivity, high catalyst cost, and difficult handling of activaters, and achieve high catalytic activity
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
[0098]The following Table 1 below displays the catalyst composition (AliBu3 and Fe tridentate compound loadings) and performance (i.e. catalyst activity, Fe metal efficiency, and bulk density of the resulting polymer particles). The catalysts listed in Table 1 below were prepared by adding Grace Davison 955 silica (10 μm, 300 m2 / g, 1.6 cc / g, 3.5% TV @ 1750° F.), AliBu3 solution (1 M in toluene), and a tridentate ligand / transition metal complex, 2,6-bis(2,4,6-trimethylarylimino)pyridyl iron dichloride. These components were added sequentially into a 25 ml toluene solution under argon atmosphere in the manner described in Section A above. The AliBu3 and Fe compound loadings were based on per gram of silica in the 25-ml toluene solution. A portion of this catalyst slurry was then used for polymerization testing according to the polymerization method described in Section B above. The polymerization conditions were at 70° C., 200 psig and the H2 / ethylene ratio was ˜0.05.
[0099]
TABLE 1AliB...
example 2
[0101]The same catalyst preparation and polymerization conditions as in Example 1 was followed, but in this case different aluminum alkyls (AlMe3 AlEt3 and AliBu3) were employed. Table 2 below outlines the performance of these catalyst systems.
[0102]
TABLE 2AlR3Fe†Cat.mmol / gμmol / gAl / FeCat ActFe ActB.D#AlR3SiO2SiO2mol / molg / gCat-hg / gFe-hg / cc1R = Me1.076.313.12,5906.1E050.282R = Et1.076.313.12,8106.6E050.293R = iBu1.076.313.15,9101.4E060.32
[0103]The results of Table 2 illustrate that the catalytic activity will vary depending on the particular components used. In the above instances, the activity and the bulk density increased with use of higher alkyl substituted aluminum compounds.
example 3
[0104]The catalyst compositions and polymerization conditions were the same as those of Example 1 except that different silicas were used in this example. The silicas used for the following examples were based on Grace Davison SP9-263 silica (10 or 20 μ, 500 m2 / g, 1.5 cc / g, 8.6 or 2.9% TV @1750° F.). The results are given in Table 3 below.
[0105]
TABLE 3CatSizeTVAliBu3FeAl / FeCat ActFe ActBD#μ%mmol / gμmol / gmol / molg / gCat-hg / gFe-hg / cc1108.6176.313.13,4608.1E050.362108.6157.317.51,6705.2E050.313202.91114.58.74,8901.2E060.36*4202.9157.317.52,7008.5E050.335202.90.557.38.72,6508.3E050.34*Polyethylene product Mw = 300,000 Mw / Mn = 10.0
[0106]The results of Table 3 illustrate that the total volatile content (TV) of the silica used did not aid in the activity of the formed catalyst composition. The higher TV silicas used in catalyst 1 and 2 actually provided catalyst compositions with lower activity when compared to the back-to-back example (see Catalyst 2 and 4 of Table 3).
[0107]Further, Catalyst...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| Percent by mass | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| Angle | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


