Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Method for treating heavy metal polluted soil

A technology for polluted soil and heavy metals, applied in the field of treatment of heavy metal polluted soil, can solve the problems of high price of chemical complexing agents, lack of universality, and a large degree of restriction, and achieves reduction of ecological risks, simple facilities, and strong applicability. Effect

Inactive Publication Date: 2007-12-12
SHENYANG INST OF APPL ECOLOGY CHINESE ACAD OF SCI
View PDF0 Cites 19 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

However, these methods have shortcomings: the heavy metals fixed in the soil can still be released from the soil when the environmental conditions change; chemical complexing agents are expensive and prone to secondary pollution; electrokinetic repair is limited by the buffer properties of the soil , soil components, ion composition of soil solution, and ion types of polluting metals are greatly affected, and are not universal; microorganisms and phytoremediation are greatly restricted by human and natural factors, and their growth is slow and their growth cycle is long. Therefore, the repair efficiency is low
Therefore, it is difficult to remove all of them with a single treatment method, and the development of soil treatment methods suitable for heavy metal polluted areas is the development direction of this research field

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Method for treating heavy metal polluted soil
  • Method for treating heavy metal polluted soil

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment 1

[0021] Remove the soil surface layer 3 in the heavy metal polluted area and replace the clean soil; use the isolation layer 1 to isolate the subsurface layer 4; lay underground blind pipes 2 to guide water; lay an anti-seepage film 9 between the subsurface layer 4 and the surface layer 3, The underground blind pipe 2 is arranged below the surface layer 3 and above the anti-seepage membrane 9 for guiding and draining surface water.

[0022] Specific implementation method (see Figure 1):

[0023] 1. The physical method of the concrete structure used in isolation layer 1 is: use concrete to build a 2m long, 2m wide, and 1m high cement pool. The height of the top of the cement pool from the ground is 0.5m, and the bottom is not closed.

[0024] 2. Cover the subsurface layer 4 contaminated soil with a height of 1.0m at the bottom of the cement pool, and the soil compactness is close to the density of the original contaminated soil; the concentrations of the original soil pollutants...

Embodiment 2

[0031] The difference from Example 1 is that there is no anti-seepage film 9 between the surface layer 3 and the subsurface layer 4, and the underground blind pipe 2 is arranged below the subsurface layer 4 for guiding and draining the percolation water, and the collected percolation water Discharge after centralized sedimentation treatment to remove pollutants, see Figure 2.

[0032] After leaching, soil samples and soil infiltration water at each monitoring point were collected every 10 days, and the concentration of heavy metals was determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP).

[0033] The measurement results are: 1#, 2#, 3# and 4# monitoring points soil heavy metal content basically unchanged, the concentrations of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd are all around 80.0, 326.0, 278.0 and 0.7ppm. The concentrations of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd in the underground leachate after precipitation treatment were all lower than 1.0, 2.0, 0.1 and 0.01ppm (see Table 1), indicat...

Embodiment 3

[0037] The difference from Example 1 is that in order to improve the treatment effect, 3% lime, a pollutant fixing agent, can be added to the encapsulated and sealed subsurface contaminated soil.

[0038] The monitoring results show that the heavy metal-contaminated soil will not pollute the groundwater and the surrounding environment after continuous leaching treatment after encapsulation, restoration and treatment.

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

The invention relates to the treatment for contaminated soil. It comprises the isolation of surface contaminated soil, surface change over, contaminated soil filtering liquid collection and collection and discharge of water for cleaning the surface soil. It applies to the treatment for all kinds of complex precious metal contamination, preventing the secondary pollution, realizing safe use of the land.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to a treatment method for polluted soil, in particular to a treatment method for heavy metal polluted soil. Background technique [0002] Soil heavy metal pollution is universal, irreversible and superficial, and heavy metal pollutants are complex. It has become a common environmental problem and has attracted more and more attention. The heavy metal elements in the soil do not undergo the process of microbial or chemical degradation, and the heavy metal elements remaining in the soil will seep into the groundwater or further pollute the environment through other means. [0003] The usual solutions are two forms of ex-situ remediation and in-situ remediation. Ex-situ remediation is to excavate the contaminated soil and then treat it with chemical, physical and biological treatment methods, because it involves excavation and transportation. Soil, the treatment cost is high, and it is difficult to control the deep pollution, especi...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(China)
IPC IPC(8): B09C1/00
Inventor 李凤梅郭书海徐晟徽李刚冷延慧
Owner SHENYANG INST OF APPL ECOLOGY CHINESE ACAD OF SCI
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products

Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.

© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com