Field emission device with anode coating
A field emission and anode technology, applied in the direction of cathode ray tube/electron beam tube, discharge tube cold cathode, discharge tube main electrode, etc., can solve problems such as cathode field emission degradation
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0047] Figure 1 shows the electric field that needs to be applied to keep the emission current constant for two different FED samples operating simultaneously in the same vacuum chamber. The curves formed by solid black squares correspond to samples with an unbaked phosphor layer, while the curves formed by hollow circles correspond to samples with a baked phosphor layer. The main difference between baked and unbaked phosphor layers is that the unbaked phosphor layer comprises a binder material (usually a polymer, in this case ethyl cellulose) still mixed with it. Phosphor, this is because the device has not been subjected to the typical baking process where the binder evaporates. In the samples with the baked phosphor layer, the phosphor layer was free from residual binder due to the volatilization described above.
[0048] Initially, the degradation rate (ie, the rate of increase in applied voltage required to keep the current emission current constant) was lower for sample...
Embodiment 2
[0050] Carbon was sputter-deposited as protective material onto an anode made of ITO (Indium Tin Oxide, a transparent conductive material). The carbon coating has a thickness of 22 nm and is amorphous in nature. The carbon-coated anode was mounted in a field emission device and the degradation rate of the emitter in this device was compared with that of a device in which the anode was made of ITO without any coating. In devices with coated anodes, the degradation rate was significantly lower than in devices with uncoated anodes, as shown in Figure 2. However, after about 75 hours, the degradation rate started to increase due to the consumption of the carbon layer. This can be seen if the anode is examined under a light microscope. Between 50-70 hours, the lower curve for the anode made only of ITO drops slightly due to the voltage limit of the DC bias applied to the anode.
Embodiment 3
[0052] The protective carbon on the anode need not be amorphous or sputter deposited. In this example, the ITO anode was spin-coated using a commercially available graphite coating (Neolube No. 2, Huron Industries Inc., Port Huron, MI 48061) containing A mixture of graphitic carbon and amorphous carbon. Figure 3 shows that the rate of emitter degradation in a field emission device fitted with such an anode is similar to that of the device in Example 2 with a carbon-coated anode. Simultaneously run the device with the ITO anode uncoated showed a much greater degradation rate, which was comparable to the performance of the device with the anode uncoated in Example 2.
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| thickness | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More - R&D
- Intellectual Property
- Life Sciences
- Materials
- Tech Scout
- Unparalleled Data Quality
- Higher Quality Content
- 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2025 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com
