Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Vertical array wind turbine

Inactive Publication Date: 2005-01-27
HERONEMUS WILLIAM E
View PDF2 Cites 37 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0015] Another advantage of the present invention is that each of the plurality of rotors is optimized for its individual wind regime. Each rotor can have a unique power rating relative to its swept area. In this way, the blades, hubs, pitch assemblies, and main bearings are similar for all of the rotors and are interchangeable as spare parts. However, the drive train and generator for each rotor would be unique. Other parameters that could be optimized for each rotor include its solidity and tip speed, although if the rotors are to be interchangeable then the solidity must be consistent among rotors. Generally, the rotors toward the top of the tower have a higher power rating, a higher tip speed, and optionally a lower solidity. This allows each rotor to extract the maximum possible amount of energy out of the wind for the wind resource that it “sees.” The energy extracted by a plurality of small rotors is greater than the energy extracted by a single massive rotor because each of the smaller rotors can be better tailored to its unique wind resource.
[0016] Each of the rotors is also controlled individually for the local wind speed that it experiences. Control parameters can include cut-in, cut-out, rotor speed, and blade pitch. By controlling each rotor individually it is possible to achieve a higher overall efficiency compared to controlling a single massive rotor based on the average wind speed that the rotor sees. Each rotor is controlled to be at the appropriate rotor speed and blade pitch to maintain peak efficiency. This allows the entire system to operate at peak efficiency for the entire range of wind speeds experienced from the lowest rotor to the highest rotor. In contradistinction, a single large rotor can only be controlled to operate at peak efficiency for one height and one wind speed while much of the rotor operates at lower efficiency.
[0017] The present invention has further advantages in terms of availability and maintenance. When a very large wind turbine faults offline, its entire production is lost. In contrast, one of the rotors of the present invention can fault offline with the resulting loss of only a small fraction of the total output. For example, if a 1.5 MW wind turbine experiences a blown fuse or some other relatively minor failure, the entire turbine is shutdown with the loss of 1.5 MW of power production. A comparable wind turbine system according to the present invention may include 15 rotors each with an output of 100, 200, 300, or 400 kW upon each rotor's hub height in the vertical array. If a fuse or other minor part fails even in the uppermost rotor, then the lost output is only 400 kW and the system can continue to produce 3500 kW out of the total system rated power of 3900 kW.
[0018] From a maintenance point of view, the present invention's larger number of small rotors allows the operators to keep a more complete selection of spare parts. For instance, if an operator is in charge of a 30 MW wind farm that consists of 20 turbines each rated at 1.5 MW they are not likely to keep any spare blades, generators, or gearboxes on hand. If one of those components experiences a failure, the operator must wait for the turbine manufacturer to supply another part and the turbine may be shut down for weeks. By contrast, if the operator was in charge of a 30 MW wind farm consisting of 20 turbines according to the present invention where each turbine has 15 rotors rated at 100 to 400 kW each, the operator would have a total of 300 sets of blades, generators, and gearboxes in operation. He could more easily justify having a spare set of components on hand because the cost of the set of spares would be lower in relation to the total cost of the wind farm.
[0019] Another maintenance advantage of the present invention is that it does not require a massive crane as prior art turbines do. Turbines that are being erected today in the 1.5 to 2 MW size range require cranes with capacities of over 500 tons that are very expensive to mobilize. By comparison, each of the smaller rotors on the wind turbine of the present invention can be lifted using a much smaller crane that is locally available and can be mobilized for a small fee. Maintenance can be further facilitated if each array of wind turbine rotors includes a boom-car crane. The boom-car crane could be located on top of the tower and could be used to remove and replace any of the rotors without the assistance of a separate crane.

Problems solved by technology

However, large turbines are also considerably more expensive than smaller machines and the economy of scale does not completely explain the trend to multi-megawatt size wind turbines.
Project developers have demanded larger wind turbines at least partly due to perception issues.
As the size of wind turbines grows, there are several technical issues that adversely affect the economics of wind energy and that can potentially lead to constraints in turbine size.
Another problem with large wind turbines is blade deflection.
The turbine designer must take care so that the blade does not strike the tower, thereby causing catastrophic failure.
However, the loads that cause deflection also increase for longer blades.
However, practical considerations such as tooling, blade weight, and material cost constrain the design so that the blade's chord and thickness are smaller relative to the blade's length for large rotors.
This causes a higher aspect ratio and lower solidity for large rotors.
However, noise issues tend to constrain tip speed ratio so that centrifugal stiffening is less for very large rotors.
All of this points toward blade deflection becoming a limiting design criteria for very large wind turbine rotors.
Another issue with very large rotors is that there is a large amount of composite material in each blade which can lead to material problems.
Statistically, there is a higher probability of a defect existing in a large blade than in a small blade.
If a defect is built into a blade, it can propogate to become a crack which will eventually lead to the blade's failure.
As the thickness of the blade's laminate increases, it becomes more and more difficult to detect flaws in the material.
Therefore, very large wind turbine blades may have a higher statistical probability of failure than a larger number of smaller blades.
Another issue for very large wind turbines is transportation and installation logistics.
Also, the tower heights necessary to support the large rotors can exceed the height capacity of cranes that are readily available.
Another problem experienced by the large wind turbines that are currently under development or being sold is that the rotors are so large that they experience a massive differential in wind speed from one side of the rotor to the other.
The variation in wind loading is even more severe since loads are generally proportional to wind speed squared.
Since each blade moves through this shear field, they are subjected to extreme fatigue loading conditions.
From an energy standpoint, things are even worse.
The rotor speed and blade pitch that work best for the wind speed at the rotor's center may not work well at all for the portions of the rotor at the top and bottom.
This problem is made worse as the turbine's rotor diameter gets larger.
The issue of windspeed variation across the rotor also has negative implications for selecting an appropriate turbine for a given site.
When the wind turbine's rotor grows to be very large, it is more difficult to tailor the power rating and rotor diameter to fit the site.
Whichever rotor is selected, it will not be optimized for the entire rotor disk area.
As wind turbines grow very large there are several problems which need to be solved.
First, the weight and cost of the turbine grow disproportionately for a very large rotor diameter.
Second, blade deflection becomes a problem and limits the rotor design for very large wind turbines.
Third, large wind turbine rotors have a greater statistical probability of material defects in the blades compared to smaller wind turbines.
Fourth, transportation and construction logistics are problematic for very large wind turbines.
Fifth, large wind turbines experience massive wind speed variations across their rotors so that at least a portion of the rotor is likely to be operating in sub-optimal conditions for the wind speed it is experiencing.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Vertical array wind turbine
  • Vertical array wind turbine
  • Vertical array wind turbine

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0037]FIG. 2 shows a wind turbine according to the prior art. The turbine includes a set of blades 2, a hub 4 a nacelle 6, and a tower 8. Prior art turbines can include any number of blades 2, although three blades is the most common configuration. The blades 2 can be oriented upwind or downwind of the tower 8, although upwind is the most common and most efficient configuration. A yaw system is provided to allow rotation between the nacelle 6 and the tower 8 so that the nacelle 6 can be aligned with the wind direction. The rotor diameter is defined as two times the length of a blade 2 plus the diameter of the hub 4. Typical rotor diameters for commercially available wind turbines have grown significantly over the past 15 to 20 years. In the mid 1980s, state of the art commercially-available wind turbines had rotor diameters of approximately 20 meters and power ratings of approximately 100 kW. In 2001, the average size of wind turbines installed in Germany was 1284 kW, and the US mar...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
Angleaaaaaaaaaa
Diameteraaaaaaaaaa
Speedaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

A wind turbine with an array of rotors arranged at various heights. Each rotor is optimized for the height at which it is located. Optimization of each rotor could include selection of rated power, solidity, tip speed, blade twist, blade taper, or rotor diameter. Each rotor can also be operated in a manner that is optimized for the wind speed it experiences. Optimized operation parameters could include blade pitch angle or rotor speed.

Description

RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This application is a Continuation of co-pending U.S. patent Application Ser. No. 10 / 092,775 which was filed on Mar. 7, 2002.FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0002] The invention relates to the field of wind turbine generators. Specifically, the invention relates to an array of wind turbine rotors on a single tower that are individually optimized to improve the economics of the entire system. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0003] Wind turbines have gained widespread use for electricity generation in recent years. The cumulative capacity of wind turbines installed worldwide has grown at a rate of approximately 32% per year over the past ten years. As of the end of 2001, the total installed capacity of wind turbines worldwide added up to over 20,000 MW. Future growth prospects for the industry are bright, although the economics of wind energy must continue to improve for the market to grow. There are signs that the potential for economic gains from current wind turbine ...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
IPC IPC(8): A61K8/14A61K8/64A61K9/00A61K9/127A61K9/14A61K31/015A61K31/047A61K31/07A61K31/122A61K31/14A61K31/164A61K31/185A61K31/196A61K31/197A61K31/198A61K31/205A61K31/231A61K31/232A61K31/352A61K31/355A61K31/375A61K31/405A61K31/4172A61K31/4188A61K31/4415A61K31/455A61K31/51A61K31/525A61K31/575A61K31/59A61K31/592A61K31/593A61K31/675A61K31/714A61K33/00A61K33/04A61K33/06A61K33/16A61K33/18A61K33/20A61K33/22A61K33/24A61K33/26A61K33/30A61K33/32A61K33/34A61K33/36A61K33/42A61K38/46A61K45/06A61K47/02A61K47/18A61K47/24A61K47/26A61K47/28A61K47/42A61K47/44A61P3/02A61P17/00A61P17/02A61P27/02A61P29/00A61P39/06A61Q19/00F03D1/02F03D1/06F03D7/02F03D7/04F03D11/00F03D11/04
CPCF03D1/02F03D11/0008F03D11/0033F03D11/04Y02E10/728F05B2240/912F05B2240/9121F05B2240/913Y02E10/721F05B2240/40F03D80/70F03D80/30F03D13/20A61P17/00A61P17/02A61P27/02A61P29/00A61P3/02A61P39/06Y02E10/72
Inventor HERONEMUS, WILLIAM E.
Owner HERONEMUS WILLIAM E
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products