Use of a catalyst comprising a beta silicon carbide support in a selective hydrodesulphurization process
a technology of beta silicon carbide and hydrodesulphurization process, which is applied in the field of oil refining industry, can solve the problems of consuming substantial quantities of olefins by catalysts, and affecting the quality of hydrocarbon oil treatment products,
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
Preparation of a Catalyst A for Use in Accordance with the Invention
[0022] A catalyst A was obtained by using a synthesis method termed the OrganoMetallic Surface Chemical method (OMSC). Silicon carbide SiC extrudates (2 mm diameter) were supplied by SICAT Sarl; their principal characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1Characteristics of SiC supportFormSurface area: SBET m2 / gPore volume (Hg) cm3 / gExtrudates530.42 mm
[0023] An aqueous solution of ammonium heptamolybdate was impregnated using the pore volume method into the silicon carbide. The molybdenum (Mo) concentration in the solution was calculated to obtain the desired Mo content on the support, then the solid was left to mature for 12 hours. The solid was then oven dried at 120° C. for twelve hours, and calcined for two hours at 500° C. in a stream of dry air (1 l / h.g of catalyst). The solid was then sulphurized in a stream of gaseous H2S in hydrogen (15% by weight of H2S, total gas flow rate 1 l / h.g of catalyst) from...
example 2
Preparation of a Catalyst B (Comparative)
[0024] Catalyst B was obtained using the same synthesis protocol as for catalyst A, with an industrial alumina type support from Axens. The characteristics of the support are given in Table 3:
TABLE 3Characteristics of industrial alumina supportFormSurface area: SBET m2 / gPore volume (Hg) cm3 / gBeads600.62.4-4 mm
[0025] The characteristics of the catalyst after sulphurization are shown in Table 4:
TABLE 4Characteristics of catalyst B (comparative)Mo contentCo contentCo / (Co + Mo) atomic ratio(wt %)(wt %)(atom / atom)3.20.70.36
[0026] Thus, catalyst B is essentially distinguished from catalyst A in the nature of the support used, and also by the dimensions of the grains.
example 3
Comparison of Use of Catalyst A with that of Catalyst B on a First Olefinic Feed
[0027] In order to overcome diffusional limitation problems, the catalysts were ground to the 300-500 micrometre fraction in the absence of air. The solids were then passivated in air at ambient temperature for 4 hours and loaded into the catalytic reactor. The catalyst was then sulphurized in situ using a synthetic feed (6% by weight of dimethyldisulphide in n-heptane) under the following conditions: Total pressure=2.0 MPa, H2 / feed=300 (litre / litre), mass flow rate of feed with respect to catalyst per hour (WHSV)=3 h−1. A constant temperature stage for sulphurization was carried out for 4 hours at 350° C. (temperature ramp-up 20° C. / hour). After sulphurization, the temperature was reduced to 150° C. and the sulphurization feed was replaced with FCC gasoline to be treated, and the operating conditions were adjusted. In this example, the two catalysts were tested on a first olefinic feed constituted by a...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| Temperature | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| Temperature | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 
