Slickened or siliconized flame resistant fiber blends

a flame-retardant fiber and blend technology, applied in the field of slickened or siliconized flame-retardant fiber blends, can solve the problems of blends that cannot pass the aforementioned tests, products with much worse flame-retardant properties than non-slickened counterparts, and have not previously imparted the comfort and/or softness desired, etc., to achieve the effect of minimal shrinkage of the char barrier, prolonging the time, and eliminating any residual flam

Inactive Publication Date: 2006-07-20
BEIJING CARINAE MATERIAL TECH CO LTD
View PDF63 Cites 46 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0067] Although one of the preferred embodiments of the invention is a thermally bonded highloft, it is also possible to utilize the fibers mentioned in Categories 1, 2, 4 and 5 and utilize binder materials from Category 6 to make a suitable resin bonded highloft flame barrier of the invention. The thermal bonded blend (i.e. also with Category 3 binder fibers) may also be coated (e.g., on one or two sides) with a light sprayed Category 6 resin coating to “lock” the surface fibers in place. This prevents the surface fibers from percolating or migrating through the ticking after being subjected to use. Fiber percolation gives an undesirable fuzzy appearance to the upholstery ticking.
[0068] The oxygen depleting gases generated by the category 2 fiber are particularly beneficial in combination with the category 1 material for highloft and needlepunch embodiments of the slickened fiber blends of this invention. In addition to helping prevent autoignition of the decomposition products coming from underlying layers, such as polyurethane foam or the like and helping to extinguish any residual flame emanating from overlying material such as dress cover fabric, the oxygen depleting gases from the polymers made with halogenated monomers also coat and protect the carbonaceous char formed during the decomposition of the inherently FR fibers. In this way, there is provided a significantly longer time before the char disintegrates when exposed to air at open flame temperatures. This synergistic blending under the present invention is thus able to withstand extended periods of time with minimal shrinkage of the char barrier; thereby preventing flames from “breaking through” the char barrier and igniting underlying materials.
[0069] The non-FR natural and / or synthetic component fibers in the slickened or non-slickened form are added to improve product economics and the final softness and resiliency properties of the highloft or needlepunch versions of the invention in the end use application.
[0070] The above percentage ranges for the various categories is in reference to the percentage by weight of a single layer of material (e.g. a flame barrier whose entire thickness is formed of a common fiber blend or in reference to one layer of a multilayer flame barrier with the other layers either also being provided for flame barrier purposes or not provided for flame barrier purposes). Moreover, the above percentages by weight can also be considered as being applicable to the percentage by weight of the sum of various layers of a multilayer flame barrier, in the case of the highloft and needlepunch embodiments of the invention. For example, the highloft and needlepunch embodiments of the present invention are intended to include within its scope a multilayer flame barrier combination having the same or differing percentages of materials from categories 1 and / or 2 (including zero percent in one layer of one of the categories 1 and 2 material with the other layer making up the difference) amongst two or more of its layers. For instance, the multilayer flame barrier can include one layer designed to provide or emphasize the category 1 material and a second layer designed to provide or emphasize the desired percentage of the category 2 material. As can be seen from the few examples directly above, and the additional examples described hereafter, the present invention provides a high degree of versatility in forming a flame barrier, although, as will become more apparent below, certain combinations of materials, particularly the category 1 and 2 materials, can provide highly advantageous flame barrier functioning. Also, from the standpoint of reducing manufacturing complexity and cost, for example, a single layer or non-multi-layer flame barrier having common blend makeup throughout its thickness (based on, for example, an inputted fiber mix blend “recipe” based on the above noted potential category combinations into a computer processor controlling the highloft or needlepunch nonwoven product manufacturing process) is preferred for many applications.

Problems solved by technology

Unfortunately, these FR products have not previously imparted the comfort and / or softness features desired by manufacturers of end-use articles which must be made open flame resistant.
It is well known in the industry to manufacture slickened and / or siliconized polyester fiber blends (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,304,817 & 4,281,042) for improved softness, comfort and silky feel; unfortunately, these products usually have much worse flame resistance properties than their non-slickened counterparts.
This blend will not pass the aforementioned tests for a flame barrier.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example i

Nonwoven Highloft with Soft Hand

[0099] A vertically lapped highloft as produced with slickened fibers of the present invention, on a Struto vertical lapping machine. The fiber blend consisted of the following: [0100] 10% slickened melamine fiber (Basofil Fiber HF200) [0101] 30% siliconized lyocell (Lenzing's siliconized Tencel M) [0102] 35% unslickened modacrylic fiber that incorporates antimony trioxide for improved flammability (Kaneka's Kanecaron Protex-S) [0103] 25% lowmelt polyester with 110 deg C. meltpoint (Huvis LMF)

[0104] The above fiber blend was double carded and thermally bonded at 285 deg F. to an 80 / 20 bicomponent polyester / standard polyester scrim that weighed 1.25 ounces per square yard.

[0105] The total basis weight of the vertically lapped soft hand nonwoven FR barrier was 363 g / m2 (1.19 ounces per square foot) and had an average thickness of 22 mm in an uncompressed state.

[0106] The above produced vertically lapped highloft FR barrier was very soft to the touch...

example ii

Nonwoven Highloft with Soft Hand

[0119] A vertically lapped highloft as produced with slickened and siliconized fibers of the present invention, on a Struto vertical lapping machine. The fiber blend consisted of the following: [0120] 10% slickened melamine fiber (Basofil Fiber HF200) [0121] 30% siliconized lyocell (Lenzing's siliconized Tencel M) [0122] 35% slickened polyvinylchloride fiber (Rhovyl ZCS) [0123] 25% lowmelt polyester with 110 deg C. meltpoint (Huvis LMF)

[0124] The above fiber blend was double carded and thermally bonded at 265 deg F. to an 80 / 20 bicomponent polyester / standard polyester scrim that weighed 1.25 ounces per square yard.

[0125] The total basis weight of the vertically lapped highloft FR barrier was 339 g / m2 (1.11 ounces per square foot) and had an average thickness of 22 mm in an uncompressed state.

[0126] The above produced vertically lapped highloft FR barrier was very soft to the touch and water resistant. A 36″ long×24″ wide sample was burn tested acc...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
densityaaaaaaaaaa
densityaaaaaaaaaa
reflectanceaaaaaaaaaa
Login to view more

Abstract

The invention relates to slickened or siliconized flame resistant fiber blends that are well suited for use in mattresses, boxsprings, upholstered furniture, fiber-filled bed clothing, transportation seating or any end use application where a soft materials are desired for flame resistant (FR) purposes. Some of the fibers in the blend are slickened. The FR fibers incorporated into these blends include both char forming FR fibers and oxygen depleting FR fibers. FR char-forming fibers are those which exhibit little shrinkage when exposed to direct flame and are not spun from polymers manufactured with halogenated monomers. Oxygen depleting FR fibers are spun from polymers manufactured with halogenated monomers.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0001] 1. Field of the Invention [0002] The invention relates to slickened or siliconized flame resistant fiber blends that are well suited for use in mattresses, boxsprings, upholstered furniture, fiber-filled bed clothing, office panel fabric, transportation seating or any end use application where a soft materials are desired for flame resistant (FR) purposes. Some forms of this invention include: [0003] 1) FR thermally bonded or resin bonded highloft comprising fiber blends of FR fibers with non-FR fibers, some fibers of which are slickened. [0004] 2) FR needlepunched nonwovens comprising fiber blends of FR fibers with non-FR fibers, some fibers of which are slikcened. [0005] 3) FR loose fill fiber comprising fiber blends of FR fibers with non-FR fibers, some of which are slickened; and [0006] 4) FR woven and FR knit fabrics produced from yarns comprising fiber blends of FR fibers with non-FR fibers, some fibers of which are slickened. [0007] The FR f...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): B32B5/02D02G3/00D02G3/02D04H1/00
CPCA47C31/001Y10T428/2904B32B5/08B32B5/26B32B2250/20B32B2262/0269B32B2262/14B32B2307/3065B32B2307/7265B32B2437/00B32B2601/00B32B2605/003B68G1/00D02G3/443D04H1/42D04H1/46D04H1/48D06M11/77B32B5/245Y10S428/92Y10S428/921B32B5/022D04H1/4258D04H1/4266D04H1/43828D04H1/43835Y10T442/2311Y10T442/232Y10T442/2328Y10T442/2336Y10T442/2344Y10T442/2352Y10T442/2631Y10T442/682Y10T442/684Y10T442/686Y10T442/688Y10T442/696Y10T442/697
Inventor HANDERMANN, ALAN C.BRIDGES, SCOTT A.
Owner BEIJING CARINAE MATERIAL TECH CO LTD
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products