Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Method for screening microcrystallizations for crystal formation

a microcrystallization and crystallization technology, applied in the direction of burettes/pipettes, sequential/parallele process reactions, crystallization, etc., can solve the problems of large bottleneck, limited amount of highly purified proteins, time-consuming process of growing crystals with high diffraction quality, etc., to accelerate drug development, more bioactive, and dissolve faster

Inactive Publication Date: 2008-07-31
RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
View PDF9 Cites 2 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0096]A further advantage of the present invention is that smaller drop volumes allow less molecule to be used to perform each crystallization trial.
[0097]As a result, a greater number of crystallization trials can be performed using the same amount of molecule. This is of great significance when it is difficult to obtain the molecule to be crystallized and when a large number of crystallization trials are needed in order to successfully crystallize the molecule.
[0098]It is frequently difficult to produce and purify the molecule being crystallized. In the case of protein crystallization, it can require one to two weeks of lab work to produce and purify enough protein to perform 48 crystallization trials using drops greater than 1 L in size. By reducing the drop volume and hence the amount of molecule used per crystallization trial, it becomes feasible to significantly increase the number of crystallization trials that can be performed. As a result, it becomes feasible to take a more combinatorial, shotgun approach to molecule crystallization trials since the pressure to conserve molecule usage is reduced. By contrast, prior to the present invention's utilization of sub microliter drop volumes, a need existed to minimize the number of trials that were performed at one time due to a shortage of available molecule.
[0099]By reducing the drop volume, the number of microcrystallizations that can be performed in the array is increased. The number of microcrystallizations in the array is typically greater than 48, preferably greater than 96, more preferably greater than 144, most preferably greater than 192. It is noted that the number of microcrystallizations in the array can also exceed 288 or 384. For example, an apparatus for preparing arrays which include 480 microcrystallizations is described herein.
[0100]Increasing the number of microcrystallizations that can be performed in the array also allows a greater number of different stock solutions to be used to form the mother liquor solutions used in the array. For example, forming the array of microcrystallizations can include using greater than 48 stock solutions to form the mother liquor solutions used in the array. Optionally, greater than 96, more preferably greater than 144, most preferably greater than 192 different stock solutions may be used. It is noted that the number of stock solutions can also exceed 288 or 384. For example, an apparatus described herein uses 480 different stock solutions.
[0101]Smaller volumes of mother liquor may also be used in the wells. The volume of mother liquor used in the wells is preferably less than about 500 L. preferably less than about 400 L, more preferably less than about 300 L and optionally less than about 250 L. Ranges of mother liquor volumes that may be used include, but are not limited to 25 L-500 L and 25 L-300 L. In this regard, forming the array of microcrystallizations may include forming the microcrystallizations in a plate including a plurality of wells each having a volume less than about 500 L, preferably less than about 400 L, more preferably less than about 300 L.

Problems solved by technology

Solving high resolution structures of protein in a high throughput fashion presents a major bottleneck in such a chain of genomics and drug development.
The process of growing crystals with high diffraction quality is time-consuming and involves trial-and-error experimentations on multiple solution variables such as pH, temperature, ionic strength, and specific concentrations of salts, organic additives, and detergents.
In addition, the amount of highly purified protein is usually limited, multi-dimensional trials on these solution conditions is unrealistic, labor-intensive and costly.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Method for screening microcrystallizations for crystal formation
  • Method for screening microcrystallizations for crystal formation
  • Method for screening microcrystallizations for crystal formation

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

[0205]The system described above was used in a plurality of lysozyme crystallization experiments where lysozyme was crystallized in a mother liquor composition including 100 mM sodium acetate and 10% sodium chloride at a pH of 4.6. The volume of the hanging drop formed by the drop formation station was different for each experiment. FIGS. 10A-10D respectively illustrate crystal formed in hanging drops of 40 nL, 100 nL, 200 nL and 1000 nL. The crystals were formed regardless of the reduction in drop size. As a result, the system can be used with submicroliter hanging drop volumes.

example 2

[0206]The system described above was used in a crystallization trial where the mother liquor for crystallizing lysozyme was optimized. During the coarse screen, 480 crystallization experiments were performed using each of the 480 mother liquors disclosed in FIG. 9. The results from each of the 480 experiments were compared to one another to identify one or more crystallization experiments yielding crystals with the most desirable characteristics. One of the identified coarse screen experiments was associated with a mother liquor composed of 30% MPD (.+-.2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol), 100 mM sodium acetate, 20 mM calcium chloride, at pH 4.6.

[0207]A fine screen consisting of 24 crystallization experiments was then performed. The composition of the mother liquors associated with each of the 24 crystallization experiments was selected relative to the composition of the mother liquor associated with the identified coarse screen experiment. The compositions of the 24 mother liquors selected f...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
volumeaaaaaaaaaa
volumeaaaaaaaaaa
volumeaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

A method is provided for performing array microcrystallizations to determine suitable crystallization conditions for a molecule, the method comprising: forming an array of microcrystallizations, each microcrystallization comprising a drop comprising a mother liquor solution whose composition varies within the array and a molecule to be crystallized, the drop having a volume of less than 1 microliter; storing the array of microcrystallizations under conditions suitable for molecule crystals to form in the drops in the array; and detecting molecule crystal formation in the drops by taking images of the drops.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]This application claims priority to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 323,037, filed on Dec. 18, 2002, which is hereby incorporated by reference that is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09 / 336,134, filed Jun. 18, 1999, which is also incorporated herein by reference.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0002]1. Field of the Invention[0003]The present invention relates to methods and apparatuses for crystallizing molecules and, more particularly, to methods and apparatuses for automating the crystallization of molecules, particularly macromolecules such as proteins.[0004]2. Description of Related Art[0005]Fast progress in the area of genomics has provided explosively growing databases of information on genes of human and other organisms by mapping, sequencing and analyzing their genomes. Many genes that may be critical for identifying people predisposed to certain diseases such as cancer have been discovered and their ...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): B01D9/00B01D9/02B01J19/00G01N33/68B01L3/00B01L3/02C07K1/00C12M1/34C30B7/00C30B29/58C40B40/10C40B60/14C40B70/00G01N1/40
CPCB01J19/0046Y10T436/25B01J2219/00317B01J2219/00328B01J2219/00376B01J2219/00378B01J2219/00412B01J2219/00547B01J2219/00585B01J2219/0065B01J2219/00689B01J2219/00691B01J2219/00702B01J2219/00725B01J2219/00756B01L3/0268B01L3/5085B01L3/50851B01L3/5088B01L2300/021B01L2300/04B01L2300/0609B01L2300/0829B01L2300/10B01L2400/0478B01L2400/0633C07K2299/00C30B7/00C40B40/10C40B60/14C40B70/00G01N2001/4027B01J2219/00313C30B29/58
Inventor SANTARSIERO, BERNARD D.YEGIAN, DEREK T.NORDMEYER, ROBERT A.CORNELL, EARL W.JAKLEVIC, JOSEPH M.SCHULTZ, PETER G.STEVENS, RAYMOND C.
Owner RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products