Method of removing an inflated implant from a bladder

Abstract

An inflated implant, such as an attenuation device, previously implanted in a urinary bladder can later be removed according to a number of different methods. Preferably, removal is accomplished transurethrally. In one embodiment, removal is accomplished by reducing the inflated implant from an enlarged profile to a reduced profile so that it may be withdrawn transurethrally by a removal system. The removal system can be configured differently depending upon whether reduction from the enlarged profile to the reduced profile is accomplished by deflation, compression, and / or other ways.

Description

[0001]This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15 / 250,503, filed Aug. 29, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14 / 512,228, filed Oct. 10, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,427,295, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13 / 660,814, filed Oct. 25, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,858,460, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12 / 343,120, filed Dec. 23, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,298,132, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 391,448 filed Mar. 17, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,470,228, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 391,446, filed Mar. 17, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,976,950, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60 / 415,949, filed Oct. 3, 2002; the disclosures of the aforementioned applications are hereby incorporated in their entirety herein by reference. Any and all priority claims identified in the Application Data Sheet,...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The present invention provides a method for treating patients after a radical prostatectomy. This method involves using a device that can reversibly reduce the volume of the bladder to prevent an increase in pressure. The technical effect of this invention is to reduce the risk of bladder damage and improve the quality of life for patients after surgery.

Problems solved by technology

These pressure waves have many undesirable effects ranging from discomfort, to stress on the organs and tissue, to fluid leakage such as urinary incontinence, to renal failure, stroke, heart attack and blindness.

The function of such diffusers is to interrupt the progress of a pressure wave and distribute the energy of the wave in so many directions so as to destroy the integrity of a uniform wavefront and its resultant effects.

Urinary tract disorders are a widespread problem in the United States and throughout the world, affecting people of all ages both physiologically and psychologically.

For instance, there is an infection risk associated with indwelling catheters, which provide a direct passage for bacteria or other microorganisms into the bladder.

Thus, indwelling catheters can only be used for relatively short-term situations.

In addition, indwelling catheters and associated collection bags are not cosmetically appealing to most patients.

One disadvantage of these valves is that they typically require surgery for installation, and some prior art valves must be operated externally and are therefore dependent on manual intervention.

Another problem associated with prior art intra-urethral valves is that the valves may be displaced into the bladder or expelled from the urethra.

There is also an infection risk associated with many such valves since they often extend into the meatus and / or have portions of the device external to the urethra providing a passage for microorganisms into the bladder.

This therapy requires lengthy and numerous treatments, and any benefits derived from the therapy typically diminish when the treatments are stopped.

Although these procedures can be clinically effective with certain patients, problems include widely variable clinical outcomes, relative high costs to perform, potential complications related to surgery, and any effects may be short lived.

These drugs typically suffer from side effects, lack of effectiveness and high morbidity.

Oral medications typically do not allow immediate relief of symptoms and include side effects such as dry mouth and constipation.

The disadvantages and limitations of the prior art treatments are numerous and include:an excessively high level of patient interaction is typically required to operate and / or maintain the devices, especially for elderly patients and for physically or mentally challenged patients;limited clinical efficacy;restricted urine outflow;patient discomfort and side effects;urethral and bladder infections related to the devices used; and relatively expensive when compared to non-clinical solutions (diapers, pads, etc.).

These prior art approaches do not address the reduction in dynamic compliance which results in increased intravesical bladder pressure.

Images