Device for controlling light radiation

Abstract

Device for controlling light radiation, which is excited in a specimen and/or which is backscattered and/or reflected and which contains one or more wavelengths, at a plurality of light outlets, wherein a separation of the light radiation into differently polarized components is carried out; and the components of the excitation radiation and/or detection radiation are affected in their polarization by means of a preferably birefringent, preferably acousto-optic or electro-optic medium, which changes the ordinary and extraordinary refractive index.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0001] 1. Field of the Invention [0002] The invention relates to a method and arrangements in microscopy, in particular fluorescence microscopy, laser scanning microscopy, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and near-field scanning microscopy, for examining predominantly biological specimens, preparations and related components. This includes methods for screening active ingredients based on fluorescence detection (high throughput screening) as well as methods of flow cytometry. Therefore, simultaneous examinations of specimens with multiple fluorophores in real time by means of simultaneous illumination of the specimen at multiple sampling points are possible with overlapping fluorescence spectra even in three dimensional structures of thick specimens. [0003] 2. Related Art [0004] A typical field of application of light microscopy for examining biological preparations is fluorescence microscopy (literature: Pawley. Handbook of Biological Confocal Micro...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0056]FIG. 13 is a graph showing the effect of an AOTF with an acoustic wave at frequency f1 and amplitude A1.

Problems solved by technology

Hence, the use of dichroic beam splitters, according to the prior art, results in poor efficiency of the separation of the excitation light from the emitted light.

The drawback with the methods for dividing the numerical aperture, known from the prior art (e.g. EP 1353209), is that, on the one hand, the efficiency of detection and, on the other hand, the optical resolution of the arrangement is impaired due to the restriction of the aperture.

The drawback with all of the above described methods, according to the prior art, is that the separation of the excitation light from the light emitted by the specimen is carried out in a wavelength-dependent manner, i.e. not flexibly adjustable, or with a limited efficiency of typically 70% to 90%, depending on the required spectral characteristics and the quantity of illumination lines.

If this is not guaranteed, then the result is a reduction in the detection efficiency, particularly in the case of a confocal detection, and / or aliasing errors, because when different wavelengths are used, the excitation spots are not stacked.

The drawback with these arrangements lies in the need for a plurality of tunable optical components that have a negative impact on the overall transmission.

The drawback with this arrangement lies in the number of optical components for a spectral spatial splitting, by means of which the efficiency of the arrangement is reduced.

Depending on the specified spectral resolution, this array is costly with regard to the electronic wiring.

In addition, the speed is restricted when using a spatial light modulator and amounts to a few 10 ms.

Therefore, the action of the SLM in combination with the dispersive elements results in a phase delay and / or a change in the amplitude of the spectral components of the light source.

In addition, in contrast to the arrangements described below, the light source must be polarized linearly, because otherwise an energy loss occurs.

Images