Bacteriostatic slow release rooting agent and preparation method thereof
A technology of rooting agent and antibacterial agent, which is applied in the field of antibacterial slow-release rooting agent and its preparation, which can solve the problems of rooting agent loss, poor slow-release performance, and reduced effect of rooting agent, so as to improve the slow-release performance, promote growth, and survive rate-enhancing effect
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
preparation example Construction
[0040] refer to figure 1 , a kind of antibacterial slow-release rooting agent disclosed by the invention and preparation method thereof, comprises the following steps:
[0041] The first auxiliary agent configuration: (1) take 40 parts of pepperwood leaves, 30 parts of fig leaves, and 20 parts of ginkgo leaves and grind them into mud, and collect the juice produced during the grinding process;
[0042] (2) Add the ground mud and juice into 400 parts of pure water, then add 1 part of hydrochloric acid, and stir evenly;
[0043] (3) Filter the solution obtained in (2), and add sodium carbonate to adjust the pH of the solution to 6.8.
[0044] Preparation of antibacterial slow-release rooting agent:
[0045] S1: According to parts by weight, take 800 parts of sodium montmorillonite, 1.8 parts of white carbon black, 0.5 parts of catalase, 20 parts of hydrogen peroxide, 2 parts of indole acetic acid growth agent, 3.6 parts of antibacterial agent, the first assistant 2 parts of a...
Embodiment 1
[0054] The difference between embodiment 18-39 and embodiment 1 is: the kind and consumption of growth agent in the described antibacterial slow-release rooting agent are as follows:
[0055]
[0056]
Embodiment 40
[0057] Embodiment 40-the difference with embodiment 43 is: the parts by weight of each raw material in the first auxiliary agent is calculated as the following table:
[0058]
pepper wood leaves
fig leaf
Ginkgo biloba
pure water
Example 40
42.5
32.5
22.5
1.5
425
Example 41
45
35
25
2
450
Example 42
47.5
37.5
27.5
2
475
Example 43
50
40
30
2
500
[0059] The difference between embodiment 44-47 and embodiment 1 is: the weight percentage of each material in the described antibacterial agent is counted as following table:
[0060]
copper rosinate
Example 44
37.5
62.5
Example 45
40
60
Example 46
42.5
57.5
Example 47
45
55
[0061] The difference between Examples 48-51 and Example 1 is that the pH meter adjusted during the preparation of the first auxiliary agent is a...
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More