Glycoproteomics sample pretreatment device and method
A sample pretreatment and proteomics technology, applied in the field of glycoproteomics sample pretreatment devices, can solve the problems of sample loss, long sample processing time, etc., and achieve the effect of improving analytical sensitivity
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0061] A schematic diagram of the structure of a sample pretreatment device and sample pretreatment method for integrated glycoproteomics is shown in figure 1 and figure 2 As shown, wherein, 1 is a pipette tip, 2 is absorbent cotton, 3 is a HILIC filler, 4 is a C18 membrane, 5 is a mixed ion exchange resin, 6 is a centrifuge tube, 7 is a support block, and 8 is a centrifuge.
[0062] The preparation method of the sample pretreatment device is as follows: in a 10 μL pipette tip, sequentially load 1 mg of absorbent cotton as a plunger, 0.5 mg of HILIC filler, 1 layer of C18 membrane, and 0.4 mg of mixed ion exchange resin particles (the mass ratio of SCX / SAX 1:1 mixing), to obtain the sample pretreatment device.
[0063] The sample pretreatment method based on the above sample pretreatment device comprises the following steps:
[0064] 1.1 Use 60 μL of methanol to activate the above-mentioned sample pretreatment device, and use centrifugation to let the liquid flow down.
[...
Embodiment 2
[0081] Example 2 Optimization of the amount of different HILIC fillers used for the enrichment of complete glycopeptides
[0082] The difference between this embodiment 2 and embodiment 1 is that the amount of HILIC filler used in the sample pretreatment device is different. Here, 0.5 mg, 1 mg, and 2 mg are used respectively, and the others are treated according to the general conditions described in embodiment 1, and carried out The comparison of the enrichment effect of the complete glycopeptide, the results are as follows image 3 As shown in a, 0.5 mg of HILIC filler is sufficient for a protein sample of 1 μg sample input amount.
Embodiment 3
[0083] Example 3 Optimization of the Enrichment of Complete Glycopeptides with Different Trypsin Usage Amounts
[0084] The difference between Example 3 and Example 1 is that the amount of trypsin used in step 1.7 in the sample pretreatment method is different. Here, 1 μg, 0.2 μg, 0.04 μg, and 0.002 μg are used respectively, and others are as described in Example 1. The general conditions of treatment, and the comparison of the enrichment effect of the complete glycopeptide, the results are as follows image 3 As shown in b, as the amount of trypsin increases, more complete glycopeptides and sugar chains are enriched and identified.
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com