Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Methods and systems for particulate matter removal from a process exhaust gas stream

Inactive Publication Date: 2020-10-15
HALDOR TOPSOE AS
View PDF0 Cites 0 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The present invention provides systems and methods for treating exhaust gas in the carbon black industry that have several advantages. These systems and methods require less water and energy, generate less wastewater, and have higher energy recovery potential compared to conventional methods. Additionally, the modular design of these systems helps to avoid the high costs associated with conventional methods. The economic benefits of the invention can be determined based on the size and sulfur content of the exhaust gas stream being treated. Overall, these systems and methods offer a more cost-effective and environmentally friendly solution for treating exhaust gas in the carbon black industry.

Problems solved by technology

However, the large volumes of these exhaust gases relative to the quantity of sulfur which they contain can make removal or recovery of sulfur compounds from these gases expensive.
Also, while the possible by-products that may be ultimately obtained from the recoverable sulfur, such as elemental sulfur and sulfuric acid, have virtually unlimited markets as basic raw materials, they sell for relatively low figures.
In general, a reaction between a solid and gas is relatively slow and has inefficient reaction kinetics, being limited by the available surface area of the solid.
Also, certain of the resultant products do not readily lend themselves to regeneration of the starting materials (meaning the absorber material has to be replaced after its surface has been saturated) or recovery of any removed sulfur values.
Wet absorption processes (e.g., wet scrubbers) suffer from the common drawback of the exhaust gas being cooled substantially and becoming saturated with water.
This cooling of the exhaust gas can decrease overall efficiency of the process because of the additional power requirements for dispersal of the exhaust gas to the atmosphere.
Further, the associated condensation and precipitation of evaporated water containing contaminants in the surrounding environment, and the general formation of plumes at the point of emission from the plant stack, can create substantial problems.
Also, in the case of SO2 removal, difficulties can arise where economic and efficient recovery of the dissolved absorbent and sulfur values from aqueous solution is attempted.
Furthermore, poorly maintained scrubbers (e.g., those that have not been adequately cleaned) have the potential to spread disease-causing bacteria.
Furthermore, the catalyst used in WSA systems for conversion of the sulfur oxides to sulfuric acid is extremely susceptible to deactivation by chemical poisoning, mechanical blockage, and thermal degradation from particulate matter in combusted exhaust gas streams.
The use of an ESP causes a significant loss in thermodynamic efficiency of the system—cooling of the gas stream for particulate removal followed by heating of the gas stream for catalytic conversion.
In addition, the operational costs of an ESP (electricity, pressure drop, flow) can become cost prohibitive.
Wet scrubbers and conventional WSA systems are not recommended for removing SO2 from exhaust gases from carbon black production processes.
This is because exhaust gases from carbon black processes have low levels of sulfur and high levels of particulate matter and water.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Methods and systems for particulate matter removal from a process exhaust gas stream
  • Methods and systems for particulate matter removal from a process exhaust gas stream
  • Methods and systems for particulate matter removal from a process exhaust gas stream

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

[0104]The first example evaluated whether there is pressure build up or poisoning of the catalyst when running at PM being multiple times higher than the 3 typically achieved after PM is removed from a combusted exhaust gas using electrostatic precipitation (ESP).

[0105]The first trial (1-A) was carried out with catalyst IV and a flow rate of 60 Nm3 / h, which is approximately a three times higher gas velocity inside the reactor than in commercial WSA plants and therefore intentionally overemphasizing possible negative effects of the PM. The operating conditions where:

[0106]SO2 50-500 ppmv, with an average of 225 ppmv

[0107]H2O>30 Vol %

[0108]O2 commonly around 1.2 Vol %

[0109]PMPM / kgcatalyst h

[0110]reactor temperature (gas phase) 420° C.

[0111]It was found that even after 28 days of operation neither the differential pressure of the guard bed (4.5 mbar), nor that over the reactor (12 mbar) increased. Subsequent kinetic testing of several samples across the length of the guard bed and acro...

example 2

[0119]These examples show the impact of the SO2 level on the conversion of the SO2.

[0120]The SO2 conversion at comparable process conditions (30 Nm3 / h flow, H2O>>30 Vol %, O2>>1 Vol %, 101 catalyst, Treaction=395° C., PM load PM / kgcatalyst h]) but varying SO2 levels is as in Table 2.

TABLE 2SO2 inletSO2 reactor outletSO2 conversionCatalyst[ppmv][ppmv][rel. %]I962475I1501590I310997I7352297I19505897II1607.395II12003897

[0121]These measurements validate that a common WSA catalyst is also active at process conditions typical for a CB plant. No test at higher SO2 loads (single digit percentage range) was carried out because the catalyst will be at least as active as at low SO2 levels, as long as the oxygen content is sufficiently high and the SO2 levels do not exceed typical WSA levels.

[0122]The experiments also indicate that at very low SO2 levels the choice of catalyst can impact the conversion significantly.

[0123]Examples 1 and 2 demonstrate that there is no (significant) difference in ...

example 3

[0124]Having shown that a guard bed can protect a conventional WSA process from poisoning by high levels of PM, the robustness of the process was demonstrated. The biggest threat for the guard bed / catalyst system would be an increase in the PM load, either by boiler operation or by a filter breach. To simulate these failure mode operations additional CB was spiked to the system, increasing the PM up to 500 mg / Nm3 for several hours. With a failure mode operation lasting only minutes this testing was intentionally overemphasizing the PM load, targeting to demonstrate the robustness of the system.

[0125]Trial 3-A was carried out with catalyst I, the SO2 inlet varying between 700-1100 ppmv and the gas flow kept constant at 30 Nm3 / h. Each step was applied for at least 3 h and a total of 278 g CB was added during the testing (Table 3).

TABLE 3PM loadPM spikingdPguard+reactorSO2 outlet[gPM / kgcatalysth][mg / Nm3][mbar][ppmv]013.9220.275014.2220.5310014.4260.7915016.7241.0620017.2261.3225016.625...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
Massaaaaaaaaaa
Massaaaaaaaaaa
Massaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

Disclosed herein are systems and methods for reducing the particulate matter content of an exhaust gas from a carbon black process.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15 / 752,331, filed Feb. 13, 2018, which is a U.S. National Stage application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of Patent Cooperation Treaty application PCT / EP2016 / 069057 filed Aug. 10, 2016, which in turn claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62 / 205,146, filed Aug. 14, 2015. Each of these applications is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein,BACKGROUND OF INVENTION[0002]Sulfur oxides (e.g., SO2) are present in the waste gases discharged from many metal refining and chemical plants and in the flue gases (e.g., exhaust gases) from power plants generating electricity by the combustion of fossil fuels. The control of air pollution resulting from the discharge of sulfur oxides into the atmosphere has become increasingly urgent. An additional incentive for the removal of sulfur oxides from exhaust gases is the recovery of sulfur values o...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
IPC IPC(8): C09C1/50B01D53/50B01D53/86C09C1/48
CPCC09C1/48C09C1/50B01D53/8625B01D53/502B01D53/869B01D49/00B01D53/8609B01D53/507B01D53/78C09C1/487B01D49/02B01D53/864C09C1/565F23G7/07B01J8/02B01J8/00
Inventor OLSEN, PETER BOCHRISTENSEN, KIMSØRENSEN, PER AGGERHOLMGRANROTH, MÅRTEN NILS RICKARDWEBB, RUSSELLTAYLOR, RODNEYHORN, DANIELBERGSTRÄSSER, RALFLOUBIERE, DONNIESCHMIDT, KAY
Owner HALDOR TOPSOE AS
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products