Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Cosmetic repair using cartilage producing cells and medical implants coated therewith

a cartilage producing cell and cartilage technology, applied in the direction of animal cells, biochemical equipment and processes, skeletal/connective tissue cells, etc., can solve the problems of difficult to accurately control and predict the depth of tissue injury, the use of chemical peels has fallen out of favor, and the risk of hypopigmentation and scarring is increased in the direction of deeper chemical peels

Inactive Publication Date: 2005-08-18
AMIR ABRAHAM +1
View PDF5 Cites 4 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0011] According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of cosmetically repairing a skin contour irregularity in a subject, the method including introducing cartilage producing cells into the skin contour irregularity thereby effecting cosmetic repair thereof.
[0012] According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a medical implant implantable in a subject including non-biological implant material coated with cartilage producing cells, the cartilage producing cells being for reducing a physiological response to the implant in the subject.

Problems solved by technology

The use of chemical peels has fallen out of favor, because it is difficult to accurately control and predict the depth of tissue injury after such peels are applied.
Deeper chemical peels in particular have an increased risk of hypopigmentation and scarring.
These disadvantages typically include dissolution within 3 months, localized hypersensitivity in 1-6% of subjects, hypopigmentation, induration and multiple nodules as a result of foreign body granulomas (Boss et al.
However, commercially available fillers such as Artecoll™, silicone and hyaluronen™ have not been approved for use in the United States.
Further, some subcutaneous fillers, such as AlloDerm™ and SoftForm™ require surgical insertion, and might result in infection, reabsorption, malposition and rejection (Boss et al.
The main disadvantage of prior art implants is the physiologic response they provoke following implantation.
While a capsule may isolate the implant from a systemic immune response, it can also contract and cause distortion and pain of the organ.
Neither of these methods employs cells.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Cosmetic repair using cartilage producing cells and medical implants coated therewith
  • Cosmetic repair using cartilage producing cells and medical implants coated therewith
  • Cosmetic repair using cartilage producing cells and medical implants coated therewith

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Harvesting Cartilage From a Donor

[0063] A cartilage explant of about 1×1 cm. is removed from an incision of approximately 1 cm in length along the posterior side of the concha of the auricle. A number 15 scalpel blade is well suited to this purpose, although other cutting implements may be employed without significantly changing the outcome of the harvest. The incision is then closed with resorbable suture material. The resultant scar is small and hidden by virtue of its location.

[0064] As is further described below, cartilage producing cells enzymatically released from the explant (further described below) can be used directly in cosmetic repair or coating of implants, or alternatively, such cells can be cultured prior to use.

example 2

Culture of Cartilage Producing Cells

[0065] Several methods can be used for harvesting chondrocytes from the cartilage explant and for culturing harvested cells (see for example, Robinson et. al. Autologous chondrocytes transplantation for reconstruction of isolated joint defects: the Assaf Harofeh Experience. Israel Medical Association Journal, Vol. 2:290-295).

[0066] The following describes a method suitable for chondrocyte harvesting and culturing. The cartilage explant is digested with collagenase (0.2% weight / volume) in complete media containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, non-essential amino acids, 50 mg / ml proline, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 35 μg / ml gentamicin for 20 hrs at 37° C. Liberated cells (chondrocytes, chondrocyte progenitors) are spun, resuspended in complete medium, counted and plated at 106 cells per T-150 flask. Cells can be passed at confluence (every 5-7 days) until sufficient cell number are achieved for purposes described in examples 3 and 4.

[00...

example 3

Cosmetic Repair By Introduction of Cartilage Producing Cells

[0068] Chondrocytes produced as describe above are dissociated by brief trypsinization monitored by microscopy. When sufficient disruption of the monolayer has been achieved, cells are washed 2 times in media without fetal calf serum and resuspended in saline or any other physiologically acceptable buffer for injection.

[0069] In order to facilitate injection, a cell density of 106 cells / ml is loaded into a syringe fitted with a needle suitable for subcutaneous injection. Because it is desirable to leave no sign of the injection, a narrow gauge needle is employed. Preferably a 25 gauge, more preferably a 30 gauge needle is used. In general, approximately 1-2 ml. are required for each cosmetic repair site (e.g. each wrinkle), although repair of large areas may require larger volumes. However, it is generally best to prepare twice this amount since the exact volume to be filled is difficult to calculate. Injection of the cho...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

A method of cosmetically repairing a skin contour irregularity in a subject is provided. The method is effected by introducing cartilage producing cells into the skin contour irregularity thereby effecting cosmetic repair thereof. A medical implant coated with cartilage producing cells is further disclosed.

Description

FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0001] The present invention relates to methods of using cartilage producing cells, such as chondrocytes, for repairing cosmetic defects such as skin contour irregularities. The present invention further relates to implantable medical devices coated with chondrocytes and, more particularly to coating of implants (natural and artificial) with chondrocytes and or and / or their progenitors as a means of reducing unfavorable host response to the implant. [0002] Cosmetic Repair [0003] Plastic surgeons, dermatologists and their patients continually search for new and approved methods for treating damaged or aging skin. Historically, the treatment of facial wrinkles was primarily accomplished with the use of chemical peels or dermabrasion. The use of chemical peels has fallen out of favor, because it is difficult to accurately control and predict the depth of tissue injury after such peels are applied. Deeper chemical peels in particular have an increas...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): A61K35/12A61L27/38C12N5/077
CPCA61K35/12C12N2500/32C12N5/0655A61L27/3817
Inventor AMIR, ABRAHAMAMIR, REVA
Owner AMIR ABRAHAM
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products