Method for producing briquettes, method for producing reduced metal, and method for separating zinc or lead
a technology of briquettes and sintering, which is applied in the direction of metal processing, furnace types, furnaces, etc., can solve the problems of reduced yield, reduced plant operating ratio, and inability to use methods for enhancing strength of agglomerates by sintering, and achieve efficient production, enhanced apparent density of primary granular materials, and high strength
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
[0071]An electric furnace dust (may be simply referred to as a “dust raw material” hereinafter) having a total iron content of 22.7% by mass (may be simply referred to as “%” hereinafter), a zinc oxide content of 38.4% by mass, a lead oxide content of 2.1% by mass, and a titanium oxide content of 0.1% by mass was used as a steel-making dust material. The grain size distribution of the dust raw material is as shown in each of FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b) and has a peak grain diameter of about 4.3 p.m. In addition, the bulk density of the electric furnace dust raw material was 760 kg / m3. In addition, coke breeze (fixed carbon: 86%) was mixed as a reducing agent. The amount of the dust raw material mixed was 85.7%, and the amount of the coke breeze mixed was 14.3%.
[0072]In a raw material mixing step before a pelletizing step, the raw material was mixed for 5 minutes using a biaxial ribbon stirrer (manufactured by Chemical Engineering Co., Ltd.), and then 4% of water and 2% of a binder (molasses...
example 2
[0078]Pellets were produced by the same method as in Example 1, and briquettes were formed from the pellets. A difference from Example 1 was that in Example 1, 4% of water and 2% of a binder (molasses) were mixed in the raw material mixing step before the pelletizing step, while in Example 2, 6% of water was mixed without using a binder.
[0079]With respect to the grain size, the produced pellets included 23.0% of pellets having a diameter in the range of 3.0 to 6.0 mm and 77.0% of pellets having a diameter in the range of 6.0 to 9.5 mm. Since the binder was not used in Example 2, the bulk density of the pellets was 1,360 kg / m3 (apparent density: 2,480 kg / m3) which value was slightly lower than that in Example 1 (1,390 kg / m3). However, the bulk density was sufficiently increased from 760 kg / m3 at the stage of the dust raw material. The water content of the pellets was 11.0% which was slightly higher than that in Example 1.
[0080]The apparent density of the briquettes produced in Exampl...
example 3
[0086]Pellets were produced by the same method as in Example 2, and briquettes were formed from the pellets. A difference from Example 2 was that the type of steel-making dust used as the raw material was variously changed.
[0087]Table 1 shows the results of the same experiment as in Example 2 using 13 different types of dust raw materials.
TABLE 1Test of Example 3 (passing through pellets)Dust raw material No.12345678910111213Dust bulkKg / m310108209806701030117075010307908301040——densityIron oxide% by19.022.927.014.926.819.419.123.223.924.615.738.942.8mass(a) Zinc oxide% by26.723.414.819.915.118.217.424.324.720.634.99.44.7mass(b) Lead oxide% by0.20.31.51.00.60.81.40.21.81.80.20.70.4mass(c) Titanium% by0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.0oxidemass(a) + (b) + (c)% by27.023.816.420.915.819.118.824.626.522.435.210.15.1massAgglomerates12345678910111213ApparentKg / m32910296028202890298029602790300031203040308026102530density beforedryingDrop strengthNumber30309302930303030243031before dry...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| apparent density | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| apparent density | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| apparent density | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


