[0004] Leakage affects the performance and safety of the entire hydrogen fuel stack, and is an important indicator for judging whether the stack can work safely and effectively. As an essential reaction gas for hydrogen
fuel cells, hydrogen has a small molecular structure, light weight, and lively properties. Features, once a leak occurs, the hydrogen will be lost from the reaction space quickly, the pressure of the
anode gas of the
hydrogen fuel cell will drop rapidly, and the efficiency of the stack will decrease until it fails; and hydrogen is very flammable and explosive, and it is likely to become a
combustion gas after it leaks out. , explosion and other hazards, directly endangering production safety
[0005]
Hydrogen fuel cell cells have the output characteristics of "
high current,
low voltage". In order to make them suitable for practical
engineering use, generally 300-500 single cells are connected in series to form a stack. For the whole stack
system, its series characteristics determine If there is a problem with any one component, the
electrical efficiency of the whole stack will be greatly reduced or even
shut down due to failure. However, there are hundreds of thousands of sealing surfaces in a hydrogen fuel cell stack, and any leakage or intrusion of any sealing surface will seriously affect The
electrical efficiency of the whole stack may even cause vicious safety accidents such as fire and explosion
[0006] To sum up, it can be seen that it is particularly important to predict the sealing performance of hydrogen
fuel cells. Unstable, the parameters such as the shape and size of the gas leakage channel become difficult to predict, which greatly reduces the accuracy of the hydrogen fuel
cell leakage rate model
[0007] In industrial production, special
leak detection equipment is used to measure the leakage rate of the entire stack of hydrogen
fuel cells. These
leak detection devices are generally heavy and bulky, and can only be fixed somewhere. It is difficult to carry out
leak detection on the spot in real time when there is a leak; secondly, in order to obtain an accurate
leak rate, it is necessary to ensure that the stack and the leak detection equipment are in normal operation for a long time at the same time, which has a long cycle and is easily disturbed by external factors; furthermore, the hydrogen fuel cell When the leakage rate is actually measured, the leak detection equipment must work together with systems such as air supply, humidification, cooling, dust prevention, and post-
processing. When the working conditions of the stack are unstable and the external load changes greatly, the shortcomings of poor flexibility and low efficiency of this traditional leak detection
system will become more obvious, and this leak detection method for the entire stack of hydrogen fuel cells, It is impossible to specifically identify the leakage point, let alone predict and control the leakage rate from the perspective of practicality and safety
[0008] In
theoretical research, the current hydrogen fuel cell seal leakage rate calculation model is mainly derived from traditional mechanical seal leakage theory, including
parallel plate gap flow theory, surface fractal theory, Persson
rough surface penetration theory, Lattice Boltzmann Method (Lattice Boltzmann Method, LBM) and Greenwood-Williamson (hereinafter referred to as G-W) random contact surface contact models are more commonly used. Through the theoretical prediction model of hydrogen fuel
cell leakage rate, the leakage rate under different working conditions and time points can be obtained. The actual measurement method, the theoretical calculation method has a
short cycle, low cost, and is easy to change the boundary conditions and implement flexibly. However, the prediction results of the leakage rate of the above-mentioned hydrogen fuel
cell leakage calculation models are quite different and cannot be unified, and the leakage rate calculation models are mostly composed of mathematical methods. It is deduced that the relationship between it and the macroscopic method is not close enough. Most importantly, there is a huge scale difference between the macroscopic
leak rate measurement method used in the project and the microscopic calculation results of the theoretical model, and it is difficult for the two to fit and verify each other. difficulty