Thermal protective composition and method of protecting a substrate from hyperthermal conditions

a technology of hyperthermal conditions and compositions, applied in the direction of weaving, transportation and packaging, special tyres, etc., can solve the problems of insufficient strength, material and method efficiency, critical limitation of weight or volume, and inability to meet the needs of strength and other issues

Inactive Publication Date: 2005-08-04
TAYLOR EDWARD W JR +2
View PDF23 Cites 8 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0013] One of the objects of one embodiment of the present invention is to provide a thermal protective system which is more efficient in protecting against jet fires than presently known system.
[0024] The refractory filler preferably includes particles or fibers, or both. The fillers preferably comprise glass, graphite, or ceramic fibers and particles (granules). The glass may be of various types. The ceramic may include, for example, metal oxides such as silica, alumina, mullite, magnesium oxide, titanium dioxide, and zirconia; metal carbides such as silicon carbide, aluminum carbide, boron carbide, and zirconium carbide; metal nitrides such as silicon nitride, boron nitride, and aluminum nitride; metal silicates such as aluminum silicate, cordierite, zircon, and steatite; and metal borides such as silicon tetraboride, tungsten boride, and zirconium boride. The graphite may be in the form of substantially pure carbon or may be a precursor material which converts to substantially pure carbon under fire conditions. Any fibers should be limited in length to no more than about 7 mm for use in present-day spray applicators, but longer fibers may be used when the upper layer is applied by other methods such as troweling, brushing, rolling, or molding. In one embodiment, the fillers comprise at least about 15% by weight of the composition. In another embodiment they comprise about 20% to 30%, by weight of the composition. In other embodiments they comprise at least 25% by weight of the composition. The inert fillers increase the erosion resistance of the system and greatly increase its effectiveness. The inert fillers are preferably chosen to reradiate heat (as by reflection) from a high temperature fire more effectively than the upper layer would without the fillers.
[0025] The upper layer incorporates a small amount of gas forming composition to ensure that an open porosity matrix is formed under fire conditions. In one embodiment, gas formers comprise less than 30% by weight of the composition of the upper layer. In another embodiment, gas formers comprise between about 10% and about 25% by weight of the composition of the upper layer. The composition of the upper layer is formulated to swell far less than the lower layer under fire conditions, preferably on the order of 10% to 100% of its initial thickness. The upper layer suppresses expansion of the lower layer, but it does not prevent expansion of the lower layer.
[0026] In presently preferred embodiments, the upper layer is modified to increase its flexibility and elasticity, as with a flexibilizing agent. In the presently most preferred embodiment, the upper layer includes from about 35% to about 65% epoxy resin. The resin is preferably modified to increase its flexibility and elasticity, illustratively with polysulfide. It is preferably cured with an amine. Other resins such as polyamides, polyimides, acrylics, urethanes, polyisocyanurates, and the like may also be useable. The polysulfide and amine curative components of the presently preferred resin give it sufficient flexibility to permit formation of a gas-permeable open porosity matrix on heating and also permit swelling of the lower layer, particularly in areas of highest heating. Only part of the gasses from the lower layer will permeate through the upper layer. The other part will result in a limited expansion of the lower layer. The upper layer is also resistant to high-temperature stresses produced by having a very high temperature on the surface of the layer and a much lower temperature underneath it.
[0031] It has been found that the composites of the present invention provide at least 30% longer protection under standard jet fire testing procedures than would be provided by a system including only the composition of the upper layer or of the lower layer, even when applied to the full thickness of the composite system. Preferred systems of the present invention provide at least 50% longer protection, and sometimes in excess of 100% longer protection.

Problems solved by technology

Before the char is totally consumed, degradation of the char layer leaves it crumbled and without the necessary strength to sustain itself, causing it to fail by being blown off or simply falling off (spalling).
Presently known materials and methods, however, are not as efficient, in terms of length of protection for a given weight of protective material, as desirable.
Efficiency is particularly important because in many applications weight or volume is critically limited.
Moreover, heavily loading coating materials with fire retardants may seriously impair their physical characteristics and otherwise limit their suitability as coatings, for example by limiting their film-forming characteristics or their water-resisting characteristics.
Under certain extreme fire conditions, all of these known coating systems have required excessive thickness and weight to provide adequate protection.
When exposed to the temperatures, heat fluxes, and aerodynamic shear forces of a jet fire, presently known coating systems erode and are quickly consumed or spall and fall off.
Metal mesh is inexpensive and widely used, but it is heavy and difficult to install.
Even when reinforced with fabric or mesh, however, known protective systems are not very efficient in protecting against a jet fire and therefore require thick, heavy coatings to provide even limited protection.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

[0036] A composition for use as an ablative upper layer was prepared containing 35% to 65% by weight of a flexible polymeric resin (illustratively a modified epoxy resin, particularly an epoxy polysulfide resin), 5% to 30% gas formers (illustratively polyol spumifics, amine blowing agents, and phosphate acid producers), and about 10% to about 40% refractory fillers. The illustrative composition is a two-component modified epoxy having a nominal formula as follows:

TABLE 1Weight percentMelamine5Ammonium polyphosphate10Pentaerythritol5Epoxy resin (Bis Phenol A)25Polysulfide and amine curative25Glass fibers (chopped)5Ceramic particles25

example 2

[0037] A lower layer active thermal protective composition was prepared containing 30% to 70% by weight of a polymeric resin (illustratively a modified epoxy resin, particularly an epoxy polysulfide resin) and 20% to 50% gas formers (illustratively polyol spumifics, amine blowing agents, and phosphate acid producers). The composition for use in the following tests was a two-component epoxy-based thermally activated coating, which when exposed to flame or thermal extreme, volatilizes at fixed temperatures, exhibiting a small volume increase (greater than twice the original thickness) through the formation of an open cell matrix, and absorbs and blocks heat to protect the substrate material. The composition included a polyfunctional alcohol, a 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, an epoxy resin and a polymer of bis-(ethylene oxy)methane containing disulfide linkages and curable terminal thiol groups (a polysulfide).

[0038] The exemplary composition is a two-component modified epoxy having a...

example 3

[0041] The test article prepared in accordance with EXAMPLE 2 was exposed to a jet fire in accordance with the procedure set out in OTI 95634 dated 1996. The test showed that the composite structure provided approximately sixty minutes of protection under the conditions of the test.

[0042] Smaller scale tests indicate that the composite system provides far greater protection than the protection given by a thickness of either the upper layer or the lower layer alone equal to the total thickness of the composite. The results of those tests are summarized below:

TABLE 3Small scale jet fire simulationsTemperaturecirca 1100° C.Heat Fluxcirca 300 kilowatts / m2Coating Composition:A = lower coating, B = upper coatingTest ArticleCoating CompositionTime to 400° C.Flat Plate6″× 6″×¼″3 mm of A and 3 mm of B44 minutes6″× 6″×¼″6 mm of A27 minutesPipeDiameter - 4″5 mm of B10 minutesDiameter - 4″3 mm of A, 3 mm of B26 minutes(Wall Thickness: ⅜″)

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
thicknessaaaaaaaaaa
thickaaaaaaaaaa
thicknessaaaaaaaaaa
Login to view more

Abstract

A composite system capable of protecting a substrate from a jet fire including a lower layer of an active fire protective material and an upper layer of a fire protective material. The upper layer forms an open cell matrix when exposed to a jet fire to permit passage of gasses from the lower layer to ambient. The upper layer comprises a fill of refractory material and protects the system during initial exposure to a hyperthermal condition. The upper layer swells on exposure to hyperthermal conditions, but swells less than the lower layer.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10 / 036,717, filed Dec. 21, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,855,401, which claims the benefit of United States Provisional application 60 / 258,138 filed Dec. 22, 2000, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT [0002] Not applicable. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0003] This invention relates to thermal protective coatings. It is particularly useful as applied to coatings which are applied to substrates to protect the substrate from extremely high intensity, high velocity hyperthermal conditions. [0004] Various compositions are known which provide protection against fire and other thermal extremes. Presently, such compositions generally include a polymeric binder and form a char when exposed to fire or hyperthermal conditions. The char-forming compositions may operate by various modalities. Several char-formi...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): C09D5/18
CPCY10T428/24942C09D5/18Y10T428/249953Y10T442/114Y10T442/131Y10T442/2631
Inventor TAYLOR, EDWARD W. JR.FELDMAN, RUBINRIPPE, JAMES A. JR.
Owner TAYLOR EDWARD W JR
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products