High performance geosynthetic article

Abstract

Geotechnical article, and process for making it, the article having coefficient of thermal expansion less than about 150 ppm / ° C. at ambient; resistance to acidic media greater than polyamide 6 resin and / or resistance to basic media greater than PET resin; resistance to hydrocarbons greater than that of HDPE; creep modulus of at least 400 MPa at 25° C., at 20% of yield stress load for 60 minutes (ISO 899-1); and 1 percent secant flexural modulus at least 700 MPa at 25° C. (ASTM D790); the article including a composition including (a) from about 1 to about 95% by weight of the composition of at least one functional group containing polymer or oligomer; and (b) from about 5 to about 99% by weight of the composition of at least one engineering thermoplastic, and optionally containing a filler and optionally containing an unmodified polyolefin, ethylene copolymer or ethylene terpolymer.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11 / 680,961 currently pending, filed Mar. 1, 2007 and entitled “UV RESISTANT MULTILAYERED CELLULAR CONFINEMENT SYSTEM”; and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11 / 680,979 currently pending, filed Mar. 1, 2007 and entitled “GEOTECHNICAL ARTICLES”; to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11 / 680,996 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,462,254, filed Mar. 1, 2007 and entitled “WELDING PROCESS AND GEOSYNTHETIC PRODUCTS THEREOF”; and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12 / 040,488 currently pending, filed Feb. 29, 2008 and entitled “PROCESS FOR PRODUCING COMPATIBILIZED POLYMER BLENDS”, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60 / 892,436, filed Mar. 1, 2007. All four of these patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.BACKGROUND[0002]The present disclosure relates to high performance geosynthetic articles, such as reinforcing strips, reinforcin...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The solution significantly enhances the durability and performance of CCSs by maintaining structural integrity under a wide range of temperatures and environmental conditions, including high temperatures and exposure to hydrocarbons, with improved welding strength and resistance to degradation over extended periods.

Problems solved by technology

Creep of the CCS wall causes loosening of the friction and loss of structural functionality of the CCS-GRM composite structure.

The situation with MDPE is even worse.

The mechanism of failure of CCS at elevated temperatures can be complex.

In addition, when the CCS is exposed to heat for a few hours per day, the exposure leads to creep and irreversible expansion.

The result is that even when temperatures fall, the intimate contact between the CCS and the GRM is irreversibly reduced and thus the combined structural integrity and performance are reduced or even lost.

Thus, the repeated cycles of heating, expansion of the CCS, resultant spreading or collapse of the GRM structure previously contained by the CCS, results in eventual failure or significant loss of function of the CCS.

The situation becomes worse when the GRM is subjected to freezing and thawing of water during autumn and winter, a process that causes expansion of the GRM against the CCS.

Since the creep resistance of HDPE and MDPE is medium or even low, the result is further loss of contact between CCS walls and GRM.

Commercially available HDPE-based CCSs are characterized by moderate stiffness, moderate dimensional stability and acceptable creep resistance at temperatures in the range of about minus 10° to plus 40° C. These CCSs are however characterized by some drawbacks: They have moderate strength, high CTE, high tendency to creep, especially when temperatures are 40° C. and over, and chemical sensitivity to hydrocarbons and more specifically fuels and oils.

Chemical sensitivity to hydrocarbons is deleterious for applications wherein the CCS or membrane is subjected to fuels and oils, for example as GRM reinforcement or for confinement in landfills, oilfields, gas stations, intensive parking areas and chemical industry or as a barrier in landfills and reservoirs.

The limiting mechanical and chemical properties of HDPE and MDPE, and of course other polyolefins, are especially pertinent to creep resistance and limited thermal resistance as well as a high tendency to swell when exposed to hydrocarbon fluids.

Tear strength and puncture resistance are important issues in membranes and CCSs, and even more important in perforated CCS wherein perforation provides drainage through the plastic wall, but weakens the strip and increases its sensitivity to tearing.

The major limiting factors of engineering thermoplastics as the resin of choice in manufacturing of CCS, are a high modulus of elasticity, which affects installation simplicity, relative high cost, relatively higher sensitivity to acids and bases, relative brittleness at temperature below about 10° C. and a low melt strength that affects the simplicity of strip extrusion.

The compositions described in this patent are not applicable for structural geotechnical applications including CCSs, due to its inherent brittleness, especially at low temperatures, and lack of protection against humidity and UV light.

This patent does not deal with either the difficulties in welding of the compositions, or the hydrolytic instability of the polyamide phase, which may be hydrolyzed in soil, especially acidic soils.

Moreover, the compositions of this patent have CTE too high for CCS and membranes.

Consequently, in extrusion applications, for example extrusion of strips for geotechnical applications, flow of the melt is uneven (melt fracturing), and segregation between phases is observed.

The compositions described in this patent are not applicable for structural geotechnical applications including CCSs, due to their flexibility and creep tendency.

The patent also does not provide a solution for the protection of the blend from hydrolysis in soils and landfills, oils and hydrocarbons, and from the degradation induced by heat and UV light.

PP is too rigid and lacks the flexibility at temperatures below about zero ° C., a property that is mandatory in CCSs.

The compatibilizer according to this patent is styrene based—thus has limited UV light resistance and thus limits the composition to indoor application or outdoor application with a lifetime of about 1 to 2 years.

Polyester blends, especially when not specially stabilized against hydrolysis, may fail in soils, especially those having pH greater than 7, within a relatively short period of time.

This patent does not provide sufficient protection against oils and fuels, acids and bases and UV light.

The high flexibility that is an advantage in flexible geomembranes becomes a drawback in CCS: when a load is applied on the CCS supporting GRM, the composite structure of the two components interacts with the load as an integrated system.

At that specific state, the integrated system is irreversibly damaged and can no longer provide the required durability, stiffness and stabilization to the GRM.

The patent does not provide a solution to the hydrolysis of the composition in soils and landfills, or when exposed to concrete or other media characterized by pH of greater than 7.

Images