Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Method of biotreatment for solid materials in a nonstirred surface bioreactor

a bioreactor and solid material technology, applied in the direction of dissolving, inorganic carrier, borehole/well accessories, etc., can solve the problem of slowing down and achieve the effect of improving the rate at which the biotreatment process progresses and increasing the capacity of the bioreactor

Inactive Publication Date: 2001-05-10
GEOSYNFUELS LLC (US)
View PDF0 Cites 9 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

This design enhances the biotreatment process by increasing the active surface area, improving air and nutrient access, and reducing processing time, making it more efficient and cost-effective compared to traditional stirred tank or heap biooxidation methods.

Problems solved by technology

Thicker coatings will increase the capacity of the bioreactor, but the rate at which the biotreatment process advances will be slowed due to the limited access of the microorganism being used to the underlying particles of solid material.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Method of biotreatment for solid materials in a nonstirred surface bioreactor
  • Method of biotreatment for solid materials in a nonstirred surface bioreactor
  • Method of biotreatment for solid materials in a nonstirred surface bioreactor

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 2

182. Another comparative test was made. In this example, the biooxidation rates of ore size fractions were compared. The ore, which was provided by the Ramrod Gold Corporation, was crushed to 1.9 cm. The -0.31 cm ore fraction was removed and used to form a concentrate. The ore sample had less than 0.08 oz. of gold per ton of ore (2.7 ppm). The sample contained both arsenopyrite and pyrite. The concentrate was made by ball milling 5 Kg of the -0.31 cm inch ore until it passed -75 .mu.m, the ball milled ore was then floated with Xanthate to form a pyrite concentrate. Before flotation clay was removed by settling with Na.sub.2SiO.sub.3 at 6 Kg / tonne of ore for 8 hours or more. The flotation was done in small batches of 500 g each in a laboratory Wemco flotation cell. Potassium Amyl Xanthate was used as a collector at a concentration of 100 g / tonne along with sodium sulfide at 1.5 Kg / tonne and Dowfroth D-200 at 50 g / tonne. The pyrite concentrate constituted 4.5% of the weight of the -0....

example 3

192. A sample of 70% minus 75 .mu.m gold ore from a mine in the Dominican Republic was used to make a sulfide float concentrate. The ore sample was obtained from the tailing pile at the mine that had already been leached with cyanide. The ore sample still contained gold values of over 2 g per tonne which were occluded within the sulfides and not directly leachable by cyanide.

193. To form the sulfide concentrate, several kilograms of this sample were further ground to 95% minus 75 .mu.m. The ground sample was then floated to form the sulfide concentrate. The flotation was done in small batches of 500 g each in a laboratory Wemco flotation cell. Before flotation, the ground ore sample was adjusted to a pulp density of 30%. The ore slurry was then mixed with 1.5 Kg / tonne sodium sulfide (Na.sub.2S) for 5 minutes at pH 8.5. Then potassium amyl Xanthate was added as a collector at 100 g / tonne and mixed for 5 minutes. Next 50 g / tonne of Dowfroth D-200 was added and mixed for 5 minutes. Fin...

example 4

200. A sample of gold bearing refractory sulfide ore that had been crushed to 80% passing 0.62 cm was prepared for testing as support rock. The ore was from the Western States mine located in Nevada, and contained a high concentration of carbonate minerals in the form of limestone. The fine material (less than 0.31 cm) was removed in order to allow for good air flow. A four kilogram sample of the +0.31 cm to -0.62 cm rock was coated with one kilogram of a gold bearing pyrite concentrate provided by another mining company. The coating was formed by placing a the coarse ore substrates and dry concentrate into a small rotating drum and spraying the mixture with a liquid which contained 2,000 ppm ferric ion and 1% Nalco #7534 agglomeration aid until all the sulfide concentrate was coated onto the wetted granite rock.

201. Iron analysis of both samples showed that the concentrate contained 210 grams of iron and the four kilograms of support rock contained 42.8 grams of iron.

202. The five ...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
particle sizeaaaaaaaaaa
particle sizeaaaaaaaaaa
surface areaaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

A method of biotreating a solid material to remove an undesired compound using a nonstirred surface bioreactor is provided. According to the method the surface of a plurality of coarse substrates is coated with a solid material to be biotreated to form a plurality of coated coarse substrates. The coarse substrates have a particle size greater than about 0.3 cm and the solid material to be biotreated has a particle size less than about 250 mum. A nonstirred surface reactor is then formed by stacking the plurality of coated coarse substrates into a heap or placing the plurality of coated coarse substrates into a tank so that the void volume of the reactor is greater than or equal to about 25%. The reactor is inoculated with a microorganism capable of degrading the undesired compound in the solid material, and the solid material is then biotreated in the surface bioreactor until the undesired compound in the solid material is degraded to a desired concentration. Preferably the thickness of the solid material coating on the plurality of coarse substrates is less than about 1 mm and the void volume of the reactor is greater than or equal to about 35%. The process is useful for many different biotreatment processes, including the bioremediation of contaminated soils, the desulfurization of coal, and the biooxidation of refractory sulfide ores and concentrates. In bioremediation applications, the undesired compound is typically an organic compound. In coal desulfurization and refractory sulfide ore biooxidation applications, the undesired compound is sulfide minerals.

Description

1. This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09 / 097,316, filed Jun. 12, 1998, by William J. Kohr, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08 / 636,117, filed Apr. 22, 1996, which itself is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08 / 588,589, filed Jan. 18, 1996, which is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08 / 459,621 filed Jun. 2, 1995. Each of the foregoing applications is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth.2. 1. Field of the Invention3. The present invention relates to the biotreatment of solid materials. In particular, the present invention relates to the ex situ biotreatment of solid materials in an aerobic process to degrade an undesired compound present in the solid material.4. 2. Description of the Prior Art5. Biological treatment processes are finding application throughout industry. Such processes have been used in waste water treatmen...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): B09C1/10C10G32/00C12N11/14C12P1/00C12P3/00C22B1/00C22B3/18C22B11/00C22B11/08
CPCB09C1/10C12P3/00C22B1/00C22B3/18C22B11/00C22B11/04C22B11/08Y10S423/17Y02P10/20Y02P20/582
Inventor KOHR, WILLIAM J.
Owner GEOSYNFUELS LLC (US)
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products