Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Flame retarded fibers and filaments and process of production therefor

Inactive Publication Date: 2005-07-21
ALBEMARLE CORP
View PDF4 Cites 22 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0008] Polybrominated anionic styrenic polymers are compatible with, and provide flame retardancy to, fiber-forming thermoplastic polymers. Such flame retardants have lower viscosities and greater thermal stability than polybrominated non-anionic styrenic polymers, an advantage in processes such as melt blending and fiber spinning. Due to their compatibility with fiber-forming thermoplastic polymers, the introduction of polybrominated anionic styrenic polymers at the formation stage of fibers and filaments eliminates the need for later processing to flame retard a fabric, and the flame retardancy imparted by the intimate mixture of the polybrominated anionic styrenic polymer with a fiber-forming thermoplastic polymer is expected to be relatively permanent, unlike a coating.
[0009] Further, polybrominated anionic styrenic polymers form relatively uniform mixtures and thus result in more homogeneous fibers. Because of the greater homogeneity, it is also possible to obtain finer (thinner) fibers which contain a flame retardant and still retain good mechanical properties. Other advantages of the greater homogeneity are that the mixtures are far less likely to clog spinneret orifices, and the produced fibers or filaments will have few areas in which the flame retardant is absent.
[0010] In addition, polybrominated anionic styrenic polymers have been found to exhibit minimal color development. In particular, the use of a polybrominated anionic styrenic polymer with a polyamide enables a reduction of color formation.
[0011] These desirable properties of polybrominated anionic styrenic polymers are present even when the bromine content of the anionic styrenic polymer is 67 wt % or more. Further, these polybrominated anionic styrenic polymers release minimal amounts of hydrogen halide under thermal processing conditions, thereby greatly reducing the opportunity for corrosion of processing equipment to occur during polymer processing operations.

Problems solved by technology

Although synthetic fiber materials possess a variety of excellent physical and chemical properties, a common drawback is their ready tendency to combustion, for which reason such synthetic fiber materials have traditionally been subjected to finishing treatment for flame retardancy.
An obvious disadvantage of coatings is that they can wear off over time.
Unfortunately, the use of flame retardant additives in synthetic fiber materials can result in undesirable color development or blooming.
In other words, such additives can detrimentally affect the color of the synthetic fiber.
In many applications, this color development problem is undesirable or unacceptable.
Furthermore, when blended with synthetic fiber materials, flame retardant additives tend to form nonuniform distributions in the mixture, and thus result in nonhomogeneous flame-retarded fibers, which have poor mechanical properties.
Specifically, if the flame retardant additive is not completely mixed with the synthetic fiber material prior to extrusion, the flame retardant additive tends to agglomerate onto itself, producing lumps in the extrusion melt, clogging the spinneret filters or orifices, or producing weak spots in the resulting continuous filament.
Such agglomerated lumps also necessarily produce other areas in which there will be a lack of flame retardant additive, and thus reduced flame retardant effectiveness.
In particular, brominated polystyrenes have oftentimes been deficient in their color characteristics.
However, high-melting flame retardants that are white often end up acting as a white pigment in the fiber, making coloring the fibers more difficult, as the white color of the flame retardant must be overcome.
Additionally, relatively few flame retardants work well with polyamides (nylons), at least in part because polyamides are high-melting.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Flame retarded fibers and filaments and process of production therefor

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

[0102] In a melt spinning apparatus, dried polyethylene terephthalate is mixed with the desired amount of polybrominated anionic styrenic polymer at 280′-300° C., and the melt is extruded into a water bath as strands. The fibers obtained are woven to form a fabric. To evaluate flame retardancy, the fabric is subjected to the small-scale NFPA-701 test (1989), a standard test established by the National Fire Protection Association. In the NFPA-701 test, a 2 inch by 10 inch piece of cloth is stretched taut over a frame, and hung vertically. This piece of fabric is put three-fourths of an inch into a 1.5 inch flame for 12 seconds. The char length, drip burn, and weight loss of the fabric are measured. To pass the NFPA-701 test, a material should have a drip burn time of zero seconds.

example 2

[0103] In a melt spinning apparatus, the desired amount of polybrominated anionic styrenic polymer is added to a molten nylon (polyamide), and the melt is extruded to give fibers or filaments. The fibers or filaments are knitted to form a fabric. Flame retardancy is evaluated by subjecting the fabric to the NFPA-701 test as described in Example 1.

example 3

[0104] In a melt spinning apparatus, the desired amount of polybrominated anionic styrenic polymer is added to a molten polypropylene, and the melt is extruded to give fibers or filaments. The fibers or filaments are woven to form a fabric. To evaluate flame retardancy, the fabric is subjected to the NFPA-701 test as described in Example 1.

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
Temperatureaaaaaaaaaa
Temperatureaaaaaaaaaa
Fractionaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

A fiber or filament which is formed from ingredients comprising (a) at least one fiber-forming thermoplastic polymer, and (b) at least one polybrominated anionic styrenic polymer is provided. The polybrominated anionic styrenic polymer has a bromine content of at least about 50 wt %. Processes for producing such fibers or filaments are also provided.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD [0001] This invention relates to thermoplastic fibers and filaments, including those where the thermoplastic is a polyester, polyamide, polyolefin, or an acrylic, which are flame-retarded with a brominated styrenic polymer. BACKGROUND [0002] Although synthetic fiber materials possess a variety of excellent physical and chemical properties, a common drawback is their ready tendency to combustion, for which reason such synthetic fiber materials have traditionally been subjected to finishing treatment for flame retardancy. Examples of finishing treatment methods include dip coating and spray coating. An obvious disadvantage of coatings is that they can wear off over time. [0003] Unfortunately, the use of flame retardant additives in synthetic fiber materials can result in undesirable color development or blooming. In other words, such additives can detrimentally affect the color of the synthetic fiber. In many applications, this color development problem is undesirable ...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
IPC IPC(8): C08K3/00C08L23/10C08L25/18C08L67/02C08L77/00C08L77/02C08L77/06D01F1/07D01F6/06D01F6/46D01F6/48D01F6/60D01F6/62D01F6/90D01F6/92
CPCC08K3/0058C08L23/10D01F6/92D01F6/90D01F6/62D01F6/60D01F6/48D01F6/46D01F1/07C08L77/06C08L77/02C08L25/18C08L67/02C08L77/00C08L2666/06C08K3/016D01F6/06
Inventor REED, JON SHANNONDE SCHRYVER, DANIEL A.
Owner ALBEMARLE CORP
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products