Stable serum-potassium detection reagent with high anti-interference capability and detection method
A technology for detection reagents and detection methods, which is applied in the field of serum potassium detection, can solve the problems of poor stability, susceptibility to interference, and high cost, and achieve the effects of enhancing stability, convenient use, and preventing turbidity
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0055] Detection reagents for serum potassium, including reagent R1 and reagent R2:
[0056] 1) The composition of its R1 is:
[0057] Tris (trishydroxymethylaminomethane) buffer (pH=8.2, 25°C) ·························· 200mmol / L
[0058] Acupoint Mixture ····································································································· 14mmol / L,
[0059] PEPs ·········································································································· 4mmol / L,
[0060] ADP ········································································································· 3.5mmol / L,
[0061] formic acid ········································································································· 0.2mmol / L,
[0062] formate dehydrogenase ······························································································· 100U / L,
[0063] alpha-ketoglutarate ·················································...
Embodiment 2
[0090] Interference test: Take fresh mixed serum, divide it into 2 equal parts, and then divide each equal part into 4 equal parts, add different interfering substances, so that the concentration in the serum reaches the requirements in Table 2. Then respectively use the reagent obtained in Example 1, and compare the content of K in serum with the common and approved serum potassium (K) reagent in the market simultaneously. The measured results of the control group and the measured results of each group after adding different interfering substances are shown in Table 2. Relative deviation (%) = (measuring mean value of interference samples - measuring mean value of control samples) / measured mean value of control samples × 100%.
[0091] It can be seen from Table 2 that the reagent of Example 1 has no obvious interference on the test results when bilirubin≤665μmol / L, triglyceride≤24.2mmol / L, and hemoglobin≤1g / L. However, the reagents of the control group were significantly inte...
Embodiment 3
[0095] Correlation experiment: using the formula in Example 1 to prepare reagents, and conducting a control test with the serum potassium kit of a company approved by the State Food and Drug Administration, which is common in the market, and testing 20 clinical serum samples at the same time, the test results are shown in Table 3 Show. And obtained the correlation curve of the two reagents (such as figure 1 As shown), the test results show that the correlation coefficient of the two kits is 0.9996, which shows that there is a great correlation between the two.
[0096] Table 3 Example 1 reagent and market common and recognized serum potassium determination kit comparative detection results
[0097]
PUM
Property | Measurement | Unit |
---|---|---|
wavelength | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com