However, landfilling has become less of a solution to
waste disposal and more of a means of storing waste until an effective means of disposal or utilization can be developed.
Each program brings some benefit, but does not represent a full solution for the waste problem.
Effective recycling requires economic justification, and most components of the
waste stream do not have sufficient economic value to offset their cost of separation and
recovery.
Composting is effective on some parts of the
waste stream, but the majority of the waste is not amenable to
compost production.
However, the high
moisture content, variability of composition and physical characteristics of urban waste have made
incineration systems expensive, inefficient, high maintenance, and unpopular with the general public.
Worse still, the incomplete
combustion of waste and biomass produces toxic dioxins.
However, waste
pyrolysis oils are not readily compatible with
petroleum-based liquid fuels, and therefore require extensive and expensive upgrading to achieve that compatibility.
However, the
pyrolysis gases are not compatible with today's
natural gas pipeline systems, and must be used on-site.
This avenue also requires expensive upgrading, as the
char from most
pyrolysis processes using urban waste does not have the
porosity, surface area and high chemical reactivity desired by the
activated carbon market.
However, these processes have little
temperature control, and produce a wide spectrum of byproducts
ranging from tars and heavy oils to light combustible gases, all diluted by the products of partial
combustion.
While the transfer of heat to the feed material is efficient, the handling of the byproducts is often difficult.
These designs suffer from several limitations.
Dioxins may be present in some waste products, and can be emitted to the environment if the combustion of those wastes is incomplete, and insufficiently high in temperature to destroy these dioxins.
), PAH's are destroyed by combustion, but conventional waste incineration technology does not reach the temperatures needed for their complete destruction.
These researchers were proceding with the intent to then wash the alkali-
chloride salts from the
char, but were unsuccessful in doing so, as the
char particles had very limited
porosity.
Below this, the liberation of
chlorine is not effective, while above it
chlorine capture by alkali is blocked by ash silicates.
If heating and temperature are not uniform, and the material is not well stirred during the reaction process, some portions of the biomass will be subject to higher temperatures and some to lower temperatures, resulting in less than complete dioxin destruction, less alkali capture, and the potential for formation of de novo dioxin precursors.
Thus pyrolysis heating systems that rely on contacting the feedstock with hot circulating solids,
partial oxidation, heat conduction through external reactor wall surfaces, or
radiation to feedstock particle surfaces cannot achieve the degree of temperature and concentration uniformity required to maximize dioxin control.
These other systems inevitably result in the need for catalyst and / or alkali addition, long
residence times, and limited dioxin destruction efficiency.
In addition, the fuel should limit the availability of free chlorine in the
combustion products.
In addition, this fuel would be lower in primary pollutants such as
sulfur and mercury, would limit the availability of free chlorine in the
combustion products, and reduce the net
greenhouse gas emissions of the
plant burning it, not just by substitution of “renewable carbon” for “
fossil fuel carbon,” but in real tons of total CO2 emitted.
Heat transfer is limited to the surface of the tube, and, the solids must be in contact with it to be heated.