Methods for analysis of spectral data and their applications

Abstract

This invention pertains to chemometric methods for the analysis of chemical, biochemical, and biological data, for example, spectral data, for example, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra, and their applications, including, e.g., classification, diagnosis, prognosis.

Description

RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This application is related to (and where permitted by law, claims priority to): [0002] (a) United Kingdom patent application GB 0109930.8 filed 23 Apr. 2001; [0003] (b) United Kingdom patent application GB 0117428.3 filed 17 Jul. 2001; [0004] (c) United States Provisional patent application U.S. Ser. No. 60 / 307,015 filed 20 Jul. 2001; the contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. [0005] This application is one of five applications filed on even date naming the same applicant: [0006] (1) attorney reference number WJW / LP5995600 (PCT / GB02 / ______); [0007] (2) attorney reference number WJW / LP5995618 (PCT / GB02 / ______); [0008] (3) attorney reference number WJW / LP5995626 (PCT / GB02 / ______); [0009] (4) attorney reference number WJW / LP5995634 (PCT / GB02 / ______); [0010] (5) attorney reference number WJW / LP5995642 (PCT / GB02 / ______); the contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.TECHNICAL ...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0087] One aspect of the present invention pertains to a method of classification which employs or relies upon one or more diagnostic species identified by a method as described herein

[0088] One aspect of the present invention pertains to use of one or more diagnostic species identified by a method of classification as described herein.

[0089] One aspect of the presen

Problems solved by technology

In a similar manner, the treatment of disease through the administration of drugs can result in a wide range of desired effects and unwanted side effects in a patient.

However, the biological consequences of gene expression, or altered gene expression following perturbation, are extremely complex.

At present, genomic methods have a high associated operational cost and proteomic methods require investment in expensive capital cost equipment and are labour intensive, but both have the potential to be powerful tools for studying biological response.

The choice of method is still uncertain since careful studies have sometimes shown a low correlation between the pattern of gene expression and the pattern of protein expression, probably due to sampling for the two technologies at inappropriate time points.

Even in combination, genomic and proteomic methods still do not provide the range of information needed for understanding integrated cellular function in a living system, since they do not take account of the dynamic metabolic status of the whole organism.

Conversely, sampling tissue for genomic and proteomic studies at inappropriate time points may result in a relevant gene or protein being overlooked.

Gene-based prognosis has yet to become a clinical reality for any major prevalent disease, almost all of which have multi-gene modes of inheritance and significant environmental impact making it difficult to identify the gene panels responsible for susceptibility.

While genomic and proteomic methods may be useful aids, for example, in drug development, they do suffer from substantial limitations.

For example, while genomic and proteomic methods may ultimately give profound insights into toxicological mechanisms and provide new surrogate biomarkers of disease, at present it is very difficult to relate genomic and proteomic findings to classical cellular or biochemical indices or endpoints.

One simple reason for this is that with current technology and approach, the correlation of the time-response to drug exposure is difficult.

Further difficulties arise with in vitro cell-based studies.

For example, exposure to ethanol in vivo may cause many changes in gene expression but none of these events explains drunkenness.

In cases such as these, genomic and proteomic methods are likely to be ineffective.

However, all disease or drug-induced pathophysiological perturbations result in disturbances in the ratios and concentrations, binding or fluxes of endogenous biochemicals, either by direct chemical reaction or by binding to key enzymes or nucleic acids that control metabolism.

If these disturbances are of sufficient magnitude, effects will result which will affect the efficient functioning of the whole organism.

Secondly, many of the risk factors already identified (e.g., levels of various lipids in blood) are small molecule metabolites which will contribute to the metabonomic dataset.

A similar limitation also applies to proteomic studies.

The multivariate nature of the NMR data means that classification of samples is possible using a combination of descriptors even when one descriptor is not sufficient, because of the inherently low analytical variation in the data.

If a substantial amount of D2O has been added, then it is possible that certain 1H NMR resonances will be lost by H/D exchange.

Freeze-drying of biofluid samples also causes the loss of volatile components such as acetone.

Biofluids are also v

Images