Antimicrobial compositions and methods
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
examples
Objects and advantages of this invention are further illustrated by the following examples, but the particular materials and amounts thereof recited in these examples, as well as other conditions and details, should not be construed to unduly limit this invention.
Glossary of Components
AcronymTrade NameDescriptionSource / AddressGMLLAURICIDINGlycerol monolaurateMedChem Laboratories,Inc. / Galena, ILPURACLactic Acid (88%)Purac America / HIPURE 88Lincolnshire, ILMandelic AcidSigma-Aldrich / St. Louis, MOBenzoic acidMallinckrodt BakerInc. / Paris, KYSalicylic acidMallinckrodtBaker Inc.C10H23 glycerin ether(Preparationdescribed inExample 18)Propylene glycolUniquema / monocaprateWilmington, DECRODAPHOSPPG-5 ceteth-10Croda Inc. / SGphosphateParsipanny, NJDOSS,COMPLEMIXDioctylsulfosuccinate,Cytec Industries / 100%sodium salt (Docusate,West Paterson, NJsodium)DOSS,AEROSOL GPGDioctylsulfosuccinate,Cytec Industries70%sodium salt, 70% inethanol / waterPOLYSTEPSodium laureth-4Stepan Company / B12sulfateNorthfiel...
examples 3-7
Antimicrobial compositions were prepared as described in Examples 1-2 using the components shown in Table 2a. Mandelic acid was ground into a fine powder using a mortar and pestle and added to the glycerin and DOSS and heated to about 88° C. for Examples 3 and 4 or added directly to the hot, molten petrolatum at about 82° C. for Examples 5 and 6.
TABLE 2aComponents (weight percent)ExampleMandelicDOSSWhiteNo.GMLAcid(100%)GlycerinPetrolatum33.001.001.0010.0085.0043.030.920.0010.1185.9453.001.001.000.0095.0063.001.000.000.0096.0072.970.900.000.9695.17
Compositions of Examples 3-7 were evaluated using the Antimicrobial Kill Rate Test and the results are shown in Table 2b and 2c.
TABLE 2bMRS A (log reduction)E. coli (log reduction)ExampleAfter 2After 5After 10After 2After 5After 10No.minutesminutesminutesminutesminutesminutes33.65.75.94.05.66.142.83.94.35.75.66.055.05.85.45.45.86.362.42.63.63.23.33.772.33.14.14.03.94.7
TABLE 2cExamplePseudomonas ae. (log reduction)No.After 2 minutesAft...
example 3
contained a hydrophilic component (glycerin) and surfactant (DOSS) in addition to the antimicrobial lipid (GML) and enhancer (mandelic acid). This sample had the best antimicrobial activity overall, achieving greater than 5.9 log reduction against all three organisms at 10 minutes. Example 4 contained no surfactant (no DOSS), which led to a decrease in activity over Example 5 which contained no hydrophilic component had decreased activity over Example 3 but the effect was not as great as elimination of the surfactant. Example 6 containing no hydrophilic component or surfactant showed relatively poor antimicrobial activity. Addition of only 1% hydrophilic component (Example 7) showed an improvement in antimicrobial activity.
PUM
Property | Measurement | Unit |
---|---|---|
Temperature | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Percent by mass | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Substance count | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com