Method To Improve The Efficiency Of Removal Of Liquid Water From Solid Bulk Fuel Materials

a fuel material and liquid water technology, applied in the direction of drying machines with progressive movements, furnaces, granular material drying, etc., can solve the problems of inability to meet the needs of industrial production, etc., to achieve the effect of improving the efficiency of thermal drying methods, reducing time and energy, and increasing efficiencies

Inactive Publication Date: 2008-09-18
GTL ENERGY LTD
View PDF48 Cites 10 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0016]The present invention improves the efficiency of thermal drying methods by evaporating liquid water that was transferred to the surface of the particle from interior pores during compaction by mechanical forces. Increased efficiencies result because water residing on the surface that is direct contact with the working fluid can be evaporated with less time and energy than water residing in the material's internal pores. The present invention transforms LRC to remove moisture, and in a gasification application, improves the gasification characteristics of raw LRC feedstock.

Problems solved by technology

The high moisture content of LRCs has impeded their use as gasification feedstock because the gasification industry has identified an optimum moisture content not exceeding 15 wt %.
If the feedstock moisture is greater than 15 wt %, plant efficiency is impaired and economics may not be viable.
A LRC with high-moisture content emits more carbon dioxide during utilization, on an equal energy basis, than low-moisture bituminous coal because the extra energy consumed evaporating moisture contained in the LRC is not available for useful work.
However, the yield of liquids such as diesel and naphtha that are produced by gasification and liquefaction processes is severely impaired as the moisture of the feedstock increases above 12 wt %.
The costs imposed by limiting feedstock to less than 12 wt % moisture severely reduce the ability to use LRCs to produce petroleum liquids and gases.
The cost of these external energy sources can be great, especially when environmental equipment is included to treat flue gases created during combustion.
The low-temperature drying methods require more time to evaporate a given amount of water than the high-temperature methods.
The expense of the larger drying vessel and ancillary equipment is often greater than the benefit gained from using a low-temperature waste energy source to heat the working fluid.
Certain LRC's are heat sensitive and are easily oxidized during drying.
Oxidation also reduces the useful energy contained in the dried product, and therefore reduces its commercial value.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Method To Improve The Efficiency Of Removal Of Liquid Water From Solid Bulk Fuel Materials
  • Method To Improve The Efficiency Of Removal Of Liquid Water From Solid Bulk Fuel Materials
  • Method To Improve The Efficiency Of Removal Of Liquid Water From Solid Bulk Fuel Materials

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

[0066]A detailed study of lignite (high-moisture lignite from North Dakota) was undertaken to assess the relative drying rates of raw material and compacted product. Experiments were conducted on materials spread out on a flat tarpaulin at ambient conditions. Samples of raw lignite and compacted lignite were taken periodically from the spread out material and assayed for total moisture. The measured moisture values were normalized as percent of the total water evaporated to compare the results on an equal basis. Drying conditions were 31° C., and 23% relative humidity. Results are plotted in FIG. 5.

[0067]These results demonstrate the increased drying rates possible by compacting the raw lignite. Table 1 summarizes the ratio of drying rates between raw and compacted lignite processed at ambient conditions of 31° C., 23% relative humidity.

TABLE 1Ratio of Relative Drying Rates for North Dakota Lignite% MoistureDryingRemovedTime, hrRawCompactedRatio0.54164.01.09222.41.513262.02.016281.8...

example 2

[0068]A detailed study of one LRC (high-moisture lignite from South East Asia) was undertaken to assess the relative drying rates of raw material and compacted product processed by an indirect rotary dryer (180 mm diameter×3000 mm long). The heated portion of the drying tube was 2000 mm long, the cooling zone was 600 mm long, and the feed zone was 400 mm long. Test conditions were identical for the compacted and raw materials. The results are summarized in Table 2.

TABLE 2Rotary Indirect Dryer Test ResultsCompactedRawTest ParameterMaterialMaterialFeed moisture, wt %4546Product moisture, wt %1638Residence time, min2020Sweep gas temperature, at130130feed point, ° C.Shell temperature, ° C.Less than 110Less than 110Maximum materialLess than 100Less than 100temperature, ° C.Sweep gas flow rate, L / min700700Material feed rate, kg / min1010

[0069]These data show the compacted material dries to a lower moisture content that is about half that of the raw material under identical drying conditions...

example 3

[0070]An experiment was conducted to measure the relative drying rates of South East Asia lignite held under warm, moist conditions that would be expected in a covered stockpile located in non-condensing, warm, humid tropical climates. Table 3 lists results.

TABLE 3Moisture Content of Lignite Stored in Warm, Humid Atmosphere30° C., >60% Relative HumidityRaw LigniteCompactedMoisture,Lignite Moisture,Time, hrswt %wt %04043483637

[0071]These test data show that the compacted material lost 50% more moisture than the raw material in 48 hours.

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
sizeaaaaaaaaaa
sizeaaaaaaaaaa
temperatureaaaaaaaaaa
Login to view more

Abstract

The invention provides methods to efficiently reduce the water concentration of raw solid fuels, including low rank coals such as brown coal, lignite, subbituminous coal, and other carbonaceous solids. Efficiently drying these materials at low temperatures significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions and allows the production of low-rank coals for gasification and liquifaction.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION[0001]This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60 / 894,591 filed Mar. 13, 2007, and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60 / 980,780 filed Oct. 17, 2007, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0002]This invention describes a method to efficiently reduce the moisture content of solid carbonaceous materials including brown coal, lignite and subbituminous coal to produce premium-quality fuels.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0003]Low-rank coals (LRCs) are abundant in the United States and elsewhere and have the potential to provide an economic feedstock for gasification. LRCs typically contain between 25 and 45 wt % moisture in the United States, and can be as great as 65 wt % in other countries. The high moisture content of LRCs has impeded their use as gasification feedstock because the gasification industry has identified an optimum moistu...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): C10L5/00
CPCC10F5/04C10F7/06C10L5/04F26B25/007C10L5/361F26B7/00F26B21/14C10L5/06C10L5/08C10L2290/08C10L2290/30F26B11/028F26B15/00F26B2200/08C10J3/72C10J2300/0906C10J2300/0909C10J2300/093B30B3/00F26B1/00F26B3/04F26B9/10F26B11/02
Inventor FRENCH, ROBERT R.REEVES, ROBERT A.
Owner GTL ENERGY LTD
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products