Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Apparatus and method of treating fine powders

Inactive Publication Date: 2004-03-18
TOTH RICHARD E
View PDF16 Cites 24 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

As the need for smaller and smaller coated particles increases, the principle barrier to achieving uniform, contiguous coating has been the tendency for particles below 10 to 15 microns to severely agglomerate and clump.
Ordinary horizontal fluidized beds and barrel coaters are simply unable to overcome the strong interparticulate attractors, such as van der Waals forces, that increase with decreasing particle diameters.
Few of the prior art methods and apparatus are capable of effectively coating contiguous and homogeneous coatings on Geldart Class C powders.
This benefit, however, is considerably offset by the principal limitations of fluidized beds: agglomeration and bonding of the powders.
As is well-known, for example, when fluidized beds are used for the production or coating of very fine powders, particles in the bed are susceptible to (a) agglomeration by van der Waals and other interparticulate attractor forces and / or (b) sintering or cementing together of particles by the coating being deposited on their surfaces at high temperature.
If these agglomerated or sintered particles are not continuously broken apart, their points of contact prevent complete coating and the lumps may tend to grow and settle to the bottom of the fluidizing bed, greatly reducing effective surface areas.
Because most coated powder applications require complete and homogeneous coating layers, the foregoing factors prevent the use of all but a small number of the methods and apparatus taught in the prior art.
Even such reactors, capable of fluidizing, deagglomerating, and coating uniform Geldart Group C particles, are challenged beyond their capabilities of coating contiguous and homogeneous coatings in many practical industrial situations.
For example, an important limitation of the RFFB-CVDR and other high gas-shear reactors is that the gas-stream deagglomeration principle fundamentally requires high gas stream velocities.
Temperature or diffusion stress cracking and size reduction due to chemical reactions and shrinkage can also result in fine particles.
This occurs because small particles that are expelled from the top of the bed have high velocities that require greater distance to slow down and turn around to return to the bed.
The elutriation phenomenon leads to a major limitation of the RFFBCVDR.
Thus, heavy powder particles averaging below about 0.5 microns and light density particles averaging below about 5 to 10 microns contain major percentages of particles that are extremely difficult to separate from gas streams which overload the particulate collection systems and rapidly clog them.
When it is a primary objective to coat smaller Geldart Class C powders, as in the case of Tough-Coated Hard Powders (TCHP), operating this equipment was traditionally difficult to impossible.
It has been demonstrated using the RFFB-CVDR equipment on commercially-available 2-micron titanium nitride core powders, that nanofines quickly overload and clog the dust collection and filtration system.
Avoiding this condition requires an expensive and quality-degrading (oxygen-inducing) Stokes Law sedimentation classification process to separate the fines and substantially reducing the yield of the incoming core powders.
Another major disadvantage is that the RFFB-CVDR, which operates in turbulent gas flow fluidization conditions, cannot be scaled down to smaller-diameter, smaller-capacity fluidized beds for research and development and for high-value products.
Test increments of different coating weight percentages of the intermediate and binder coatings, plus test increments of extremely expensive core powder such as cubic boron nitride or diamond, or test increments involving different carbon percentages all become practically and economically out of reach because milling in test increments breaks off the coatings and blending has been found to be highly ineffective at these grain sizes.
Yet another major disadvantage of the RFFB-CVDR occurs when it is used to coat small and / or very light density Geldart Class C powders with 50-75 wt % of tungsten, for example.
Yet another major disadvantage of the RFFB-CVDR stems from the reduced residence times spent in the coating zone by the smaller particles and nanofines in a Geldart Class C particle size distribution.
It has been found that this reduced uniformity of the coating thickness on both large and small particles in the distribution has a potentially severe effect.
Such interactions are characteristic of cermets and significantly reduce fracture toughness and wear resistance of the finished article.
This process, involves significant heat losses, and thus reduces the thermal efficiency of the RFFB-CVDR reactor.
Still another major disadvantage of the RFFB-CVDR is that as the smaller particles are separated, collected, and recirculated into the reaction zone, they cool and must be reheated, wasting the heat energy gained in the reaction zone.
Finally, this long residence time of the nanoparticles outside the hot reaction zone varies according to the amount of powder in the lot, creating two other major disadvantages.
The key barriers to wider use of these methods include removal of the liquid media after coating, residual salts or other products, oxidation, and coagulation of the coated powders.
This may become a trend with increasing numbers of core particle materials, but producing such uniform powders of many different ceramic materials is in itself a highly challenging scientific endeavor.
The non-uniform compression is sufficient to force the particulate material to flow through the elongated apertures resulting in shear and tensile forces being applied to the particulate material.
While not wishing to be limited, it is believed that the non-uniform compression provides a flow gradient to the particulate material flowing through the elongated apertures.
The non-uniform compression is sufficient to force the particulate material to flow through the elongated apertures resulting in shear and tensile forces being applied to the particulate material.
As stated, one problem typically associated with treating Geldart class C or larger powders of metal, binder, ceramic, or polymer is the tendency of such powders to agglomerate, and thus not be uniformly treated.
The non-uniform compression is suitably applied to the particulate matter such that it forces the particulate material to flow through the elongated apertures resulting in shear and tensile forces being applied to the particulate material.
In certain circumstances, the non-uniform compression provides a flow gradient to the particulate material flowing through the elongated apertures.
If the rotational speed is too high, the comb and its support may be overloaded and the powder may "cake" excessively on the walls of the drum due to excessive g-forces and squeezing by the comb.
The non-uniform compression should be in an amount sufficient to force the particulate material to flow through the elongated apertures resulting in shear and tensile forces being applied to the particulate material.
Additional non-uniform compression may be applied to the particulate material by forcing the particulate material between the structural support portion of the contacting member.
The prior art describes problems in the homogenization of powders coated with a CVD process.
For example, premature CVD coating generally occurs at the reactant gas inlet.
However, too short a length decreases the amount of heat that can be supplied to the surface of the drum at the periphery.
On the other hand, too long a drum length decreases homogeneity and fluidization efficiency.
The ceramic or metallic filter cannot be placed inside the rotating drum reactor because the powder cascading from above would quickly clog, e.g., within minutes.
In fact, left unchecked, the agglomerates tend to classify themselves according to size, further hindering homogeneous processing.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Apparatus and method of treating fine powders
  • Apparatus and method of treating fine powders

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0096] The apparatus hereinabove described was employed to effect CVD coating of W.sub.2C on TiN powder to create TCHP. The reactor was tilted on its rotational axis at 15 degrees and the combined rack and guide was operated with a 20.degree. helix angle and with the comb fixed at a squeeze angle of generally between about 13 and about 60 degrees. The final angle used was approximately 60 degrees. A suitable amount of TiN core powder was introduced into the chamber of the graphite reactor. The system was purged, hydrogen flow initiated, and the internal pressure adjusted to 11.25 Torr. Power was then supplied to the electric furnace to bring the drum of the reactor, rotating at 90 revolutions per minute, to a temperature of about 550.degree. C., for about one hour. The flow meters for the WF.sub.6 supply and the cumene bubbler were then opened to provide a molar ratio of the reactants suitable for the deposit of W.sub.2C on the TiN substrate powder. The bubbler operated at 20.degree...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
Fractionaaaaaaaaaa
Fractionaaaaaaaaaa
Angleaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for economic treatment of Geldhart class C or larger substrate powders of single or plural metal, ceramic, or polymeric materials. In particular, the present invention is directed to coating such powder via a fluidized CVD or PVD, electroless, electrochemical, or solution chemistry plating process, and provides processes and apparatus for accomplishing same. It is particularly suited to coating with single or plural layers of metal, ceramic, binder, sintering aid, or polymer onto such materials without agglomeration. The coated particles and products made therefrom exhibit novel physical properties that are not limited by classical chemical and thermodynamic constraints.

Description

[0001] This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Application No. 10 / 079,504, filed on Feb. 22, 2002, which is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 09 / 423,229, filed on Feb. 29, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,372,346, which is the national stage filing of PCT / US98 / 09767, filed May 13, 1998, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. .sctn.119(e) to U.S. provisional application number 60 / 046, 885 filed May 13, 1997, the subject matter of which is incorporated by reference herein.[0002] 1. Field of the Invention[0003] The invention relates to the treatment, and particularly the encapsulation and deagglomeration of particles previously difficult to coat in a fluidized bed, for example, because of the size and / or density of the particles. Such particles generally comprise metal, binder, ceramic, refractory, or polymer with a coating or coatings of metal, binder, ceramic, sintering aid, or polymer.[0004] 2. Background Of The Invention[0005] Encapsulated powders have been p...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
IPC IPC(8): B22F1/08B22F1/17B22F1/18C09K3/14C22C29/00
CPCB22F1/02Y10T428/13B22F2005/001B22F2998/00B23B27/148C04B35/62831C04B41/009C04B41/4584C04B41/87C04B2235/3886C09K3/1445C22C29/00C23C16/32C23C16/4417C23C24/06B22F1/025B22F2207/07C04B41/4531C04B41/5057C04B35/58B22F1/17B22F1/18B22F1/08
Inventor TOTH, RICHARD E.
Owner TOTH RICHARD E
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products