Biointerface membranes incorporating bioactive agents

a bioactive agent and biointerface technology, applied in the field of biointerface membranes, can solve the problems of loss of function, inability to provide data safely and reliably for long periods of time, and current use devices are unable to achieve the effect of improving the performance of blood-contacting surfaces

Inactive Publication Date: 2006-09-07
DEXCOM INC
View PDF99 Cites 342 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0012] The biointerface membranes, devices including these membranes, and methods of use of these membranes according to the preferred embodiments allow for long term protection of implanted cells or drugs, as well as for obtaining continuous information regarding, for example, glucose levels of a host over extended periods of time. Because of these abilities, the biointerface membranes of the preferred embodiments can be extremely useful in implantable devices for the management of transplant patients, diabetic patients, and patients requiring frequent drug treatment.
[0019] In an aspect of the first embodiment, the bioactive agent includes a non-heparin based synthetic coating configured to improve a performance of blood-contacting surfaces.

Problems solved by technology

Despite the increasing number of individuals diagnosed with diabetes and recent advances in the field of implantable glucose monitoring devices, currently used devices are unable to provide data safely and reliably for long periods of time (for example, months or years).
With reference to conventional devices that can be implanted in tissue, a disadvantage of these devices is that they tend to lose their function after the first few days to weeks following implantation.
While not wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it is believed that this loss of function is due to the lack of direct contact with circulating blood to deliver sample to the tip of the probe of the implanted device.
Because of these limitations, it has previously been difficult to obtain continuous and accurate glucose levels.
A disadvantage of cell-impermeable membranes is that they often stimulate a local inflammatory response, called the foreign body response (FBR) that has long been recognized as limiting the function of implanted devices that require solute transport.
Previous efforts to overcome this problem have been aimed at increasing local vascularization at the device-tissue interface, but have achieved only limited success.
This has led to widely supported speculation that poor transport of molecules across the device-tissue interface 26 is due to a lack of vascularization near the interface.
Previous efforts to overcome this problem have been aimed at increasing local vascularization at the device-tissue interface, but have achieved only limited success.
For example, when applied to an implantable glucose-measuring device, both glucose and its phosphorylated form do not readily transit the cell membrane.
However, it has been observed by the inventors that once the monolayer of cells (barrier cell layer) is established adjacent to a membrane, increasing angiogenesis is not sufficient to increase transport of molecules such as glucose and oxygen across the device-tissue interface 26.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Biointerface membranes incorporating bioactive agents
  • Biointerface membranes incorporating bioactive agents
  • Biointerface membranes incorporating bioactive agents

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Preparation of Biointerface Membrane with Porous Silicone

[0184] A porous silicone cell disruptive (first) domain was prepared by mixing approximately 1 kg of sugar crystals with approximately 36 grams of water for 3-6 minutes. The mixture was then pressed into a mold and baked at 80° C. for 2 hours. The silicone was vacuumed into the mold for 6 minutes and cured at 80° C. for at least 2 hours. The sugar was dissolved using heat and deionized water, resulting in a flat sheet, porous membrane. Different architectures were obtained by varying the crystal size (crystals having an average diameter of about 90, 106, 150, 180, and 220 μm) and distribution within the mold that the silicone was cast from. After removal of silicone from the mold, the resulting membranes were measured for material thickness.

[0185] The cell-impermeable (second) domain was prepared by placing approximately 706 gm of dimethylacetamide (DMAC) into a 3L stainless steel bowl to which a polycarbonate urethane solut...

example 2

Neovascularizing Agents in Biointerface Membranes

[0188] In a first experiment, disks were employed, which were prepared for three-week implantation into the subcutaneous space of rats to test a neovascularizing agent. Monobutyrin was chosen based on its hydrophobic characteristics and ability to promote neovascularization. This experiment consisted of soaking the porous silicone prepared as described above in the concentrated solution of the bioactive compound at elevated temperature. This facilitated a partitioning of the agent into the porous silicone dependent upon its solubility in silicone rubber. Porous silicone disks were exposed to phosphate buffer mixed with Monobutyrin (500 mg / ml) for four days at 47° C. These disks were then autoclaved in the same solution, then rinsed in sterile saline immediately prior to implant. Disks were implanted into the subcutaneous dorsal space. Rats were euthanized and disks explanted at 3 weeks. Disks were fixed in 10% NBF and histologically ...

example 3

Anti-Inflammatory Agents in Biointerface Membranes

[0190] Dexamethasone was loaded into a porous silicone biointerface membrane by sorption. In this experiment, 100 mg of Dexamethasone was mixed with 10 mL of Butanone (solvent) and the mixture heated to about 70° C.-80° C. to dissolve the Dexamethasone in the solvent. The solution was then centrifuged to ensure solubility. The supernatant was pipetted from the solution and placed in a clean glass vial. Disks of porous silicone were placed in the Dexamethasone solution at 40° C. for 5 days, after which the disks were air-dried. The disks were sprayed with 70% isopropanol to remove trapped air from the porous silicone, attached to glucose sensors, and sterilized in 0.5% glutaraldehyde for 24 hours. After rinsing, the glucose sensors were placed in a 40 mL phosphate buffer solution conical. These conicals were placed on a shaker table with a setting of about 7 or 8. Dexamethasone release in PBS solution was measured daily for the first...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
pore sizeaaaaaaaaaa
pore sizeaaaaaaaaaa
timeaaaaaaaaaa
Login to view more

Abstract

A biointerface membrane for an implantable device including a nonresorbable solid portion with a plurality of interconnected cavities therein adapted to support tissue ingrowth in vivo, and a bioactive agent incorporated into the biointerface membrane and adapted to modify the tissue response is provided. The bioactive agents can be chosen to induce vascularization and / or prevent barrier cell layer formation in vivo, and are advantageous when used with implantable devices wherein solutes are transported across the device-tissue interface.

Description

RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10 / 842,716, filed May 10, 2004, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10 / 647,065, filed Aug. 22, 2003, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60 / 472,673, filed May 21, 2003, and application Ser. No. 10 / 842,716 also claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application 60 / 544,722, filed Feb. 20, 2004. All above-referenced prior applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0002] The present invention relates generally to biointerface membranes that can be utilized with implantable devices, such as devices for the detection of analyte concentrations in a biological sample, cell transplantation devices, drug delivery devices and electrical signal delivering or measuring devices. The present invention further relates to methods for determining ana...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): A61F13/00A61L31/10A61L31/14A61L31/16
CPCA61B5/14532A61B5/14865A61L31/10A61L31/14A61L31/146A61L31/16A61L2300/00G01N33/48707B33Y80/00A61L2400/08
Inventor SHULTS, MARKBRAUKER, JAMES H.CARR-BRENDEL, VICTORIATAPSAK, MARKMARKOVIC, DUBRAVKA
Owner DEXCOM INC
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products