Known for long, the dispersion type EL device has the
advantage of ease of fabrication; however, it has only limited use on account of low luminance and short service life.
The problem is that since the insulator layers are each formed of a thin film, it is difficult to reduce to nil steps at the edges of the pattern of the transparent electrode, which occur when a large area display is fabricated, and defects in the thin-film insulators, which are caused by dust, etc. occurring in the production process, resulting in a destruction of the light-emitting layer due to a local
dielectric strength drop.
Such defects offer a fatal problem to display devices, and become a
bottleneck in the wide practical use of thin-film EL devices in a large-area display
system, in contrast to
liquid crystal displays or
plasma displays.
Although the use of this thick- film dielectric layer leads to a problem that the effective
voltage applied to the light-emitting layer drops, this problem can be solved or eliminated by using a high
permittivity material for the dielectric layer.
However, it is still difficult to sufficiently smooth down the surface of a dielectric layer fabricated by an ordinary thick-film process.
For this reason, the
sintering of the thick-film dielectric layer does not proceed to a sufficient extent, yielding an essentially
porous layer.
This results in problems such as a decrease in effective light-emitting area because an
electric field cannot be effectively applied to the portions of the light-emitting layer formed on non-flat portions of the substrate, and a decrease in
light emission luminance because local non-uniformity of thickness causes a local dielectric breakdown of the light-emitting layer.
Furthermore, locally large thickness fluctuations cause the strength of an
electric field applied to the light-emitting layer to locally vary too largely to obtain any definite light emission
voltage threshold.
However, the
polishing of a large-area substrate for display or other purposes is technically difficult to achieve, and is a factor for cost increases.
The addition of the
sol-gel step is another factor for cost increases.
When a thick-film dielectric layer has abnormally sintered sites which may give rise to asperities too large for removal by
polishing, they cannot be removed even by the addition of the
sol-gel step, which causes a drop of manufacturing yield.
It is thus very difficult to use a thick-film dielectric material to form a light emission defect-free dielectric layer at low cost.
In consideration of
heat resistance and a reactivity problem with respect to the dielectric layer, the substrate used for the formation of such a thick-film dielectric layer is limited to
alumina or
zirconia ceramic substrate; it is difficult to rely on inexpensive glass substrates.
The substrate meeting such conditions is obtained only with much technical difficulty, and is yet another factor for cost increases.
This, too, is a factor for cost increases.
However, when the multilayer dielectric layer is formed by a solution
coating-and-firing process, using a lead-based dielectric material as the dielectric layer material, a light-emitting layer to be formed on the dielectric layer can react with the lead component of the dielectric layer, giving rise to some practically unfavorable problems such as initial light emission luminance drops, luminance variations, and changes of light emission luminance with time
Such an excessive lead component precipitates easily from within the dielectric layer under thermal loads after the formation of the dielectric layer, especially thermal loads in a
reducing atmosphere.
If a light-emitting layer as mentioned later is formed directly on this dielectric layer, there would then be light emission luminance drops and considerable adverse influences on long-term reliability through the reaction of the light-emitting layer with the lead component and
contamination of the light-emitting layer with movable
metal lead ions.
Even when
lead oxide is not reduced to
metal lead by the
reducing atmosphere in particular, the incorporation of the
lead oxide component in the light-emitting layer causes
lead oxide to be reduced by
electron bombardments due to high electric fields within the light-emitting layer with the result that the released
metal ions have an adverse influence on reliability.
However, any satisfactory effect on prevention of the
diffusion of lead is hardly obtained because of minute surface defects in the lead-based dielectric layer or the
surface roughness thereof, or the local
surface roughness of the non-lead-based dielectric layer due to the deposition of dust or the like ascribable to fabrication steps.
This may otherwise result in a local decrease or deterioration in the luminance of the light-emitting layer due to the local
diffusion of the lead component.
For this reason, the use of such a non-lead-based dielectric layer causes EL device drive
voltage to become too high to obtain practical utility.
When a light-emitting layer is formed on the BaTiO.sub.3 layer in such a state, no sufficient effect on prevention of the
diffusion of lead is obtained because the light-emitting layer comes in direct contact with the lead component.
A thickness exceeding 16 .mu.m results in cost increases because the number of repetition of the solution coating-and-firing process becomes too large.
However, much technical difficulty is generally encountered in forming a dielectric layer having a
relative permittivity of 1,500 or greater, using the solution coating-and-firing process.
A functional thin film like an EL light-emitting layer cannot possibly be formed and used on such a dielectric layer.
No particular limitation is imposed on the thickness of the light-emitting layer; however, too large a thickness leads to a driving voltage rise whereas too small a thickness causes a light emission luminance drop.
With the prior art, problems such as the reaction of the lead component in the dielectric layer with the light-emitting layer and the diffusion of lead are unavoidable.