In Situ Remediation of Inorganic Contaminants Using Stabilized Zero-Valent Iron Nanoparticles

Abstract

A method for preparing highly stabilized and dispersible zero valent iron nanoparticles and using the nanoparticles as a remediation technology against inorganic chemical toxins in contaminated sites. The method employs a composition containing select polysaccharides (starch or cellulose) as a stabilizer for the iron nanoparticles in a liquid carrier, and results in suspensions of iron nanoparticles of desired size and mobility in water, brine, soils or sediments. The stabilizer facilitates controlling the dispersibility of the iron nanoparticles in the liquid carrier. An effective amount of the composition is delivered to a contaminated site so that the zero valent iron nanoparticles can remediate one or more toxins such as an arsenate, a nitrate, a chromate, or a perchlorate in the contaminated site.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 60 / 787,626, filed Mar. 30, 2006 and 60 / 872,616, filed Dec. 1, 2006.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] The present invention relates to mitigating the toxic effect of inorganic contaminants in contaminated sites, and more particularly, to using stabilized zero-valent iron nanoparticles for the in situ immobilization and / or remediation of toxic inorganic contaminants such as chromate (CrO42−), perchlorate (ClO4−), nitrate (NO3−), and arsenate (AsO43−) in water, brine, and soil. [0003] Chromium has been widely detected in groundwater and soils, particularly at sites associated with metal plating, wood processing, leather tanning, metal corrosion inhibition, and pigment production. From 1987 to 1993, releases of various chromium compounds to land and water in the U.S. totaled nearly 200 million pounds (EPA, 2006). Compared to the much less soluble Cr(III) species...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0034] The herein described methods and compositions provide numerous advantages over traditional remediation technologies. First, the desired iron nanoparticles can be prepared with the aid of select low cost and environmentally friendly starch or cellulose as a stabilizer. Second, the stabilized iron nanoparticles can be directly injected, mixed or dispersed into contaminated sites such as ground water, surface water, fresh water, brine, soils or sediments, and the size, growth rate, and dispersibility of the nanoparticles can be controlled by manipulating the types and concentration of the stabilizer used. Third, the application of the nanoparticles will not pose any harmful effect on the local environment. These and other advantages can be discerned by those skilled in this art from the description set forth herein.

Problems solved by technology

However, ZVI nanoparticles prepared using traditional methods tend to either agglomerate rapidly or react quickly with the surrounding media (e.g. dissolved oxygen or water), resulting in rapid loss in soil mobility as well as reactivity.

Because agglomerated ZVI particles are often in the range of micron scale, they are essentially not transportable or deliverable in soils, and thus, cannot be used for in situ applications.

Past massive application of perchlorate has left a contamination legacy.

For its unique chemistry, it has been highly challenging to remove perchlorate from water by traditional water treatment approaches.

However, these technologies are constrained with some critical technical and economic drawbacks such as slow degradation kinetics and production of large volumes of concentrated process waste residuals.

While many commercial IX resins can offer high perchlorate sorption capacity, regeneration efficiency of the IX resins has been found prohibitively poor.

As a result, current IX processes are often used on a disposable basis (i.e. the resin is disposed of after only one service run) or, when resin regeneration is practiced, it will result in large volumes of spent regenerant brine.

Because of the highly stressful conditions, biological treatment of the spent brine is rather challenging and very limited.

Consequently, cost-effective technologies that can destroy perchlorate in fresh water and regenerant brine are in dire need.

Nitrate contamination of groundwater is also a widespread environmental problem, and has been associated with agricultural land runoff, leaching of nitrogen fertilizers, concentrated animal feeding operations, food processing, and industrial waste effluent discharge.

Ingestion of nitrate in drinking water by infants can cause dangerously low oxygen levels in the blood.

Nitrate-N concentrations of 4 mg / L or more in rural drinking water supplies have been associated with increased risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Although IX-selective resin has been commercially available and IX is an EPA-designated best available technology, IX does not degrade nitrate but rather concentrates nitrate in spent regenerant brine, which demands further costly handling and treatment.

In addition to its prohibitive process cost, disposal of nitrate-laden membrane rejects remains to be a costly obstacle.

However, it has not gained popularity in drinking water treatment for its slow kinetics under typical drinking water conditions, pH sensitivity, and unfavorable byproducts including taste and odor in the treated water.

However, current iron nanoparticles, which are typically prepared following the classical borohydride reduction of ferrous or ferric ions in water, tend to agglomerate to large flocs (micrometer to millimeter scale) and precipitate in minutes.

Compared to nitrate removal from fresh water, research on nitrate reduction in saline water has been very limited and remains in its exploratory stage.

Consequently, iron nanoparticles hold great potential to immobilize arsenic in situ in contaminated soil and groundwater.

However, as previously noted herein, because of the high reactivity and inter-particle interactions, ZVI nanoparticles tend to agglomerate rapidly, resulting in the formation of much larger aggregated particles and loss of reactivity and soil mobility.

(2000) concluded that higher iron content in soil reduces the leachability of arsenic.

Images